Jump to content

2014-2015 NBA thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

NYDN - Frank Isola Here are a few interesting things to take from this article. Nothing entirely new to share at this point though.

 

There is growing belief that Phil Jackson is open to signing-and-trading Carmelo Anthony for an asset back. Phil Jackson has maintained a close relationship with Bulls vice president John Paxson.

 

The fact that Anthony has delayed his decision suggests that money is not his only motive. “If it was just about money he would have made a decision days ago,” said a person close to Anthony. “It’s not that simple.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best part of the FA frenzy is the hilarious contract given to McBob and the collective BJ he's getting as a supposedly good player. Let's all remember that last year was his best year ever and he scored 8.5 points, 4.8 boards, and 4.3 assists (woo!) on 43% shooting (36% 3PT). Only in the NBA does a guy who has peaked with those numbers, has unexceptional size and athleticism, and has already played for 5 teams get a 4yr/$23M contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 09:29 AM)
The best part of the FA frenzy is the hilarious contract given to McBob and the collective BJ he's getting as a supposedly good player. Let's all remember that last year was his best year ever and he scored 8.5 points, 4.8 boards, and 4.3 assists (woo!) on 43% shooting (36% 3PT). Only in the NBA does a guy who has peaked with those numbers, has unexceptional size and athleticism, and has already played for 5 teams get a 4yr/$23M contract

 

36% from 3 for a big dude is pretty good. I think his role is going to be Bosh-lite - hang out on the perimeter, stretch the D to give Lebron a lane and hit open 3's. He can also pass the ball really well. 4.3 assists on a crap team is impressive.

 

It's also entirely possible that was all a fluke and he's a bust for them. I'm cool with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, did anyone listen to the Simmons/Lowe podcast from yesterday? Simmons made the argument that in his opinion all of the Lakers stuff with Melo is just negotiating ploy so that New York would do a sign and trade with the Bulls. Without the Lakers the Knicks could pretty easily call Melo's bluff that he wants to leave since he'd be leaving a ton of money (what, like 30 million or so?) on the table. But the difference with the sign and trade with the Lakers isn't nearly as much and is much more "acceptable." Thus, the Knicks really could lose Melo for nothing, so they may be enticed by what the Bulls can offer them: Boozer + 2 first round picks. They had some examples of what 1st round picks were going for in terms of taking on contracts and Boozer's 16-17 million was really pretty reasonable. For a team with no picks in the coming seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 09:29 AM)
The best part of the FA frenzy is the hilarious contract given to McBob and the collective BJ he's getting as a supposedly good player. Let's all remember that last year was his best year ever and he scored 8.5 points, 4.8 boards, and 4.3 assists (woo!) on 43% shooting (36% 3PT). Only in the NBA does a guy who has peaked with those numbers, has unexceptional size and athleticism, and has already played for 5 teams get a 4yr/$23M contract

 

To be fair, he's very athletic for a 6'10 kid, and has exceptional passing ability. The downside is he's an athletic 6'10 kid that plays like a SF.

 

This is the same NBA where Gordon Hayward might be getting a max deal, while Lance Stephenson is fighting for 12M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 09:41 AM)
BTW, did anyone listen to the Simmons/Lowe podcast from yesterday? Simmons made the argument that in his opinion all of the Lakers stuff with Melo is just negotiating ploy so that New York would do a sign and trade with the Bulls. Without the Lakers the Knicks could pretty easily call Melo's bluff that he wants to leave since he'd be leaving a ton of money (what, like 30 million or so?) on the table. But the difference with the sign and trade with the Lakers isn't nearly as much and is much more "acceptable." Thus, the Knicks really could lose Melo for nothing, so they may be enticed by what the Bulls can offer them: Boozer + 2 first round picks. They had some examples of what 1st round picks were going for in terms of taking on contracts and Boozer's 16-17 million was really pretty reasonable. For a team with no picks in the coming seasons.

Yeah, I listened and it sounded like they both felt the Bulls were in it (Simmons predicted Melo to the Bulls at the end). They both talked about how scary the Bulls team looks with Melo. I was getting pretty excited about the whole thing, although I knew to take it with a grain of salt.

 

They made an interesting point about Lebron getting Rich Paul's name out there because he is invested in the agency. That's a really interesting angle that I never thought of with the whole Cleveland thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Palehosefan @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 09:43 AM)
To be fair, he's very athletic for a 6'10 kid, and has exceptional passing ability. The downside is he's an athletic 6'10 kid that plays like a SF.

 

This is the same NBA where Gordon Hayward might be getting a max deal, while Lance Stephenson is fighting for 12M.

He definitely has hops, but his lateral quickness isn't all that great. If he had good lateral quickness there wouldn't be as much downside to a 6'10 kid that plays SF.

Edited by Boogua
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between Gordon Hayward and Lance is that UTah has vowed to match all offers whereas the Pacers quite clearly are strapped. They cannot go into the luxury tax, well, they could, but again they only made 7 million last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 09:53 AM)
It sounds a whole hell of a lot like CLE at least believes they are in it for LBJ. They're going to feel pretty down if it doesn't work out again

They think they have him for sure. Unless something crazy happens they think its over and will be announced fairly quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be really good with LeBron going back to Cleveland. It would sort of be like an awesome and original music artist selling out for a short period of time to make money and then finding their roots again that got them to where they were in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jul 9, 2014 -> 10:22 AM)
A NY writer said all the James to Cleveland hype is being generated by the Cavs to save face for losing him in 2010.

 

I don't really buy that, but if it is true and it basically shames LeBron to come back, it's a genius move.

If there was no interest from the Lebron side, why wouldn't he have his agent or team come out and squash the whole thing. He didn't have to meet with them either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...