fathom Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 5, 2014 -> 03:27 AM) I understand the value aspect but you have to pitch to win playoff gashes. The Cubs might have one starter, if this is legit from Arrieta. Cubs have money to spend, so maybe overpaying a pitcher you airway have might not be a bad idea. I could see them signing Lester and trading for David Price Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 5, 2014 -> 03:27 AM) The sox have lots of trade chips though. It's not like they don't have a chance to add. I was surprised by the value that Viciedo supposedly has from that article today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:23 PM) I'd definitely rather Addison Russell and the other valuable pieces than Samardzija/Hammel on talent-appropriate extensions Not to mention they have a chance to get him back when he's a FA. Highly unlikely Beane resigns him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:28 PM) I could see them signing Lester and trading for David Price I don't. They don't have money and have show no desire for major league talent. Why trade Samardzija and then trade David Price? Price is obviously better, but the marginal gain isn't enough to justify all the effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (Jake @ Jul 5, 2014 -> 03:30 AM) I don't. They don't have money and have show no desire for major league talent. Why trade Samardzija and then trade David Price? Price is obviously better, but the marginal gain isn't enough to justify all the effort. Samardzija told them he wanted to test the market, so they knew they had to deal him. Everything I have read says they will start going after major guys like Lester this offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:27 PM) I understand the value aspect but you have to pitch to win playoff gashes. The Cubs might have one starter, if this is legit from Arrieta. Cubs have money to spend, so maybe overpaying a pitcher you airway have might not be a bad idea. I don't agree they have money to spend. The owners are broke and are begging for city money to fix their stadium. The team is highly leveraged already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:33 PM) Samardzija told them he wanted to test the market, so they knew they had to deal him. Everything I have read says they will start going after major guys like Lester this offseason. He's going to get major money in the offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feeky Magee Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:27 PM) I understand the value aspect but you have to pitch to win playoff gashes. The Cubs might have one starter, if this is legit from Arrieta. Cubs have money to spend, so maybe overpaying a pitcher you airway have might not be a bad idea. As I said earlier, currency is currency. If even half of their terrific hitting prospects continue to perform as they should/have been doing, they'll have pieces left over to trade for pitching. Not to mention almost their whole roster will be on league minimum/arb, leaving them to go wild in free agency. Hell, what's to stop them going after Samardzija in 2015 when they're actually ready to contend and now have Addison Russell and co in return for letting him out for a year and a half and getting higher draft picks as a result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Think on the bright side....at least they didn't draft Rodon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 08:27 PM) The sox have lots of trade chips though. It's not like they don't have a chance to add. But not chips as valuable as last years chips. Less chance to get players who are more talented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:33 PM) Samardzija told them he wanted to test the market, so they knew they had to deal him. Everything I have read says they will start going after major guys like Lester this offseason. I'd rather have Samardzija than Lester Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 08:36 PM) Think on the bright side....at least they didn't draft Rodon. I'll feel much better when he signs on the dotted line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:38 PM) But not chips as valuable as last years chips. Less chance to get players who are more talented. We don't have as many holes either. The Sox are in pretty good shape and also will have money to spend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feeky Magee Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 09:36 PM) Think on the bright side....at least they didn't draft Rodon. I'd still take Rodon now but there's a non-zero chance that with Schwarber and their prep overslots that they get more value Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:35 PM) As I said earlier, currency is currency. If even half of their terrific hitting prospects continue to perform as they should/have been doing, they'll have pieces left over to trade for pitching. Not to mention almost their whole roster will be on league minimum/arb, leaving them to go wild in free agency. Hell, what's to stop them going after Samardzija in 2015 when they're actually ready to contend and now have Addison Russell and co in return for letting him out for a year and a half and getting higher draft picks as a result. That makes sense, just seems risky. How many FA pitchers have you seen completely fail? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feeky Magee Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 09:40 PM) That makes sense, just seems risky. How many FA pitchers have you seen completely fail? I think the Cubs scouting department has earned some trust in terms of their evaluation of players, and Theo/Jed in terms of player procurement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Cubs have made a lot of good moves. This is another one of them. For as bad a team as they've been, they always seem to have starting pitchers to flip, and those guys always bring back at least some interesting prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (Feeky Magee @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:47 PM) I think the Cubs scouting department has earned some trust in terms of their evaluation of players, and Theo/Jed in terms of player procurement The Edwin Jackson deal is solid. I get what you are saying, but when it comes time to compete you can't depend on finding a diamond in the rough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosox41 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:33 PM) I don't agree they have money to spend. The owners are broke and are begging for city money to fix their stadium. The team is highly leveraged already. They do have one thing the SOx don't. A fanbase that will actually go out and pay to watch them play, especially with any sign of being good. Even now the Sox are a better team and the Cubs draw more and are charging higher ticket prices. Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (gosox41 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 11:02 PM) They do have one thing the SOx don't. A fanbase that will actually go out and pay to watch them play, especially with any sign of being good. Even now the Sox are a better team and the Cubs draw more and are charging higher ticket prices. Bob Well, I think you mean a broker base that will pay for tickets but that's true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friend of Nordhagen Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (gosox41 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 11:02 PM) They do have one thing the SOx don't. A fanbase that will actually go out and pay to watch them play, especially with any sign of being good. Even now the Sox are a better team and the Cubs draw more and are charging higher ticket prices. Bob This can't be overstated. There's really no mystery to it. If every team could simply take every decent major league player they had and "flip them" at the deadline, they'd have a lot of good prospects, too -- and an awful lot of high draft picks as well. Then add the minor league players that Hendry signed before he left (for which he'll never receive credit because the media is TheoJed brainwashed) -- guys like Baez and Alcantara -- give it 3 years and . . . yes, you have a deep farm system. But that only happens when you can still draw, and they can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (SoxAce @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:12 PM) Fantastic deal for Jed and Theo. I disagree. It really risky trading away MLB pitching for hitting suspects no matter how good they may be. It's probably a good deal when you need to factor in how they will acquire any pitching. Although they will get the best pitcher in next year's draft now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:27 PM) The sox have lots of trade chips though. It's not like they don't have a chance to add. Who exactly? Viciedo, De Aza, Danks, Alexei, Dunn, Gillaspie, Belisario, Lindstrom (when healthy). That's all I got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 10:20 PM) It is a great return but I think the Cubs would be better off paying Samardzija. When you want to compete you can't keep banking on finding the next Scott Feldman or Jason Hammel. That's just it. Are they going get a pitcher that is better than Smarj? Then they are setting their rebuild back two to three more years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jul 4, 2014 -> 11:14 PM) Who exactly? Viciedo, De Aza, Danks, Alexei, Dunn, Gillaspie, Belisario, Lindstrom (when healthy). That's all I got. Well, that's a lot. You can add Beckham and probably Petricka and Putnam too. Alexei must be put front and center. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.