Jump to content

Rangers @ Sox


Kyyle23

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Aug 6, 2014 -> 12:49 AM)
Yeah this board voted 36-6 against trading Danks for Santiago. Lulz. Don't understand the love affair with Danks here.

 

Sadly, his extension could very well end up being one of the worst deals in Sox history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Danks and all, he's a good guy who has pitched really well for us, but I'm obviously worried. I hope he can turn it around and I don't think it's impossible that he does - but there is no good trend to fall back on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Aug 5, 2014 -> 07:49 PM)
Sadly, his extension could very well end up being one of the worst deals in Sox history.

This is why I was advocating taking ANYTHING from the Yankees, not playing hard ball. Get out from under this terrible contract for a pitcher who is just bad now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Aug 5, 2014 -> 08:51 PM)
This is why I was advocating taking ANYTHING from the Yankees, not playing hard ball. Get out from under this terrible contract for a pitcher who is just bad now.

 

Yea I was right there with ya. Nobody needed FIP (hi Dick) to tell you John Danks was gonna regress when you saw him throw 88 mph fastball up followed by 82 mph changeup up followed by looping breaking ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Aug 5, 2014 -> 06:51 PM)
This is why I was advocating taking ANYTHING from the Yankees, not playing hard ball. Get out from under this terrible contract for a pitcher who is just bad now.

No doubt about it. Ship has sailed along with Danks' ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...