southsider2k5 Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 10, 2014 -> 10:51 AM) I think Eaton would probably get $12-15 mill a year in free agency. He's a similar player to Ellsbury but probably not overall as talented. Yeah, that is kind of how I feel. Guys like Carl Crawford (in his big years) and Ellsbury are probably not attainable levels for Eaton. I don't think he has that kind of pop or speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BamaDoc Posted October 11, 2014 Share Posted October 11, 2014 No one. Make them compete, work and get another season to evaluate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 10, 2014 -> 08:51 AM) I think Eaton would probably get $12-15 mill a year in free agency. He's a similar player to Ellsbury but probably not overall as talented. Ellsbury had more power and had a far more proven track record. Now is a good time to sign Eaton. He's had one year and still hasn't proven that he can consistently stay on the field. Give him that long-term success at the right price. He wins with the long-term security and we have some upside if he stays healthy and produces like we think he can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted October 14, 2014 Share Posted October 14, 2014 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Oct 10, 2014 -> 08:51 AM) And yet ALMOST everyone here would be more likely to give a five year deal to Eaton as of today than Avisail Garcia. Four tools or not. To think he's ever going to be a "good or above average" fielder is pushing your luck. He's got good speed, but not in a basestealing or quick outfield jumps type of way...it's more of a 50-80 meters "top speed" after taking a long time to accelerate. In the end, it will come down to plate discipline/contact and hitting 25-35 homers with 30-40 doubles rather than 12-18 homers and 25 doubles. Both would be huge risks, Garcia to bust entirely and Eaton from a health standpoint. If someone told me I had to go long-term with one of them, I'm going with Eaton. He might have a higher injury risk but he plays plus defense, is fast, has a good eye, and is a generally good hitter with far less flaws to his game. I also think he brings a ton of value in this new era of baseball vs. Avisail who quite frankly is going to have to be a pretty good hitter to make up for his defensive shortcomings. And at this point, while I like the tools, he has a whole lot to prove about being able to be the above to well above average hitter he's going to need to be to make up for those defensive issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.