GreenSox Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 06:12 PM) First of all, welcome to modern day MLB. You're literally not moving on from high strikeout guys, they're all over the place. Secondly, he had a down year, with some major fielding issues and injury issues, both of which went to the plate with him. He's 27, at that age its entirely possible he could pull things together next year. Hell, he could probably be even better if he stays healthy and is put in the right setting. He's not the greatest hitter in human history, but he shouldn't have a very high price, he would fill a need on our team, and he'd be less of a long term money commitment than most of the other DH options. He ought to at least be on the list. If you can get him for Viciedo, fine I guess. Bad fielder, Ks a lot. These were both huge weaknesses with the Sox -so why seek out more bad defenders who K a lot? Sox were 5th to last in strikeouts. Webb was terrible in the pen; Guerra was good. I see a lot of keep Webb and waive Guerra scenarios. Edited October 16, 2014 by GreenSox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 04:02 PM) Morales put up a whopping .612 OPS last year. I can give excuses why both of them had a down year, but man, Morales was as punchless as Gordon Beckham. Maybe Alvarez's foot problems continue and Morales makes a comeback if he actually has a spring training, do your homework and a physical on both, but given an even choice? The guy who is 4 years younger and hit a helluva lot better would make more sense to me. And no one is giving legit "Bullpen help" for Viciedo. Viciedo is a borderline non tender candidate. The reason why I'd think Alvarez might work for him is that Alvarez is on that same path and it'd be a "fresh start" setup for both guys. The thought of replacing Dunn with Alvarez, let alone what you'd have to give up to get him, doesn't excite me. I've already made my case that I don't want another player like Dunn around. I also don't want a pure DH, I want whomever we bring over to be able to play positions and to ultimately end up seeing our outfielders and other players maybe get days off by DH'ing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 04:12 PM) First of all, welcome to modern day MLB. You're literally not moving on from high strikeout guys, they're all over the place. Secondly, he had a down year, with some major fielding issues and injury issues, both of which went to the plate with him. He's 27, at that age its entirely possible he could pull things together next year. Hell, he could probably be even better if he stays healthy and is put in the right setting. He's not the greatest hitter in human history, but he shouldn't have a very high price, he would fill a need on our team, and he'd be less of a long term money commitment than most of the other DH options. He ought to at least be on the list. Just cause more guys do it, doesn't mean you have to accept it or think that it is valuable. I could also say, look at the teams in the playoffs (small sample size) but the teams who are having the most success do not strike out a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 06:12 PM) First of all, welcome to modern day MLB. You're literally not moving on from high strikeout guys, they're all over the place. Secondly, he had a down year, with some major fielding issues and injury issues, both of which went to the plate with him. He's 27, at that age its entirely possible he could pull things together next year. Hell, he could probably be even better if he stays healthy and is put in the right setting. He's not the greatest hitter in human history, but he shouldn't have a very high price, he would fill a need on our team, and he'd be less of a long term money commitment than most of the other DH options. He ought to at least be on the list. I have to agree with all this as well. Alvarez being 27, has power and a DH/1B makes him a fit for this team and closer to what Hahn is looking for as a potential core player. He's not ideal by any means but the FA market is short on #3/4/5 LH power hitters and the Sox are short on minor league talent to use as worthy trade bait so Alvarez makes plenty of sense. I think you're right Balta, Viciedo for Alvarez has to be pretty damn close to fair for both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 06:30 PM) Just cause more guys do it, doesn't mean you have to accept it or think that it is valuable. I could also say, look at the teams in the playoffs (small sample size) but the teams who are having the most success do not strike out a lot. I agree but that's merely one aspect though. Those same teams are playing great defense behind some great starting pitching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Vance Law @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 06:25 PM) Pirates DFA'd Tabata I know. I mentioned in an earlier post that Pitt designated Tabata for assignment, which he accepted and is now apart of their AAA affiliate. Thing is that Tabata will still make 4M next year regardless and that likely makes him trade bait which is why his name was brought up in the first place. The idea was to throw his name into the mix to relieve Pitt of his salary in an effort to try and nab Snyder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vance Law Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (StRoostifer @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 07:27 PM) I know. I mentioned in an earlier post that Pitt designated Tabata for assignment, which he accepted and is now apart of their AAA affiliate. Thing is that Tabata will still make 4M next year regardless and that likely makes him trade bait which is why his name was brought up in the first place. The idea was to throw his name into the mix to relieve Pitt of his salary in an effort to try and nab Snyder. Ah. Missed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted October 17, 2014 Author Share Posted October 17, 2014 Well the purpose of this thread was to generate ideas for this off season, and I think it has worked so far. Having good, quality discussions on potential players. QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 05:23 PM) You know, if you are going to insult SoxPride and his ideas, the least thing you could do is come up with something better than this when asked to show off your own foolproof plan. QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 05:33 PM) +1 Thank you. My idea behind CarGo is that he's still young at 28. There's 3 years left on that deal with a good amount of money on it. I look back on it, and maybe it is an overpayment, but if the Rockies chipped in some money, you still know they are going to ask for those types of players, hell probably even Anderson. He had one bad year last year, he hasn't had a year with an OPS under 850 before last year and his rookie year. Yes, he is injury prone, but that is the risk you take to get a quality left handed bat still in his prime. Sorry Joshua that we don't agree, but CarGo is a fit for the White Sox. Especially if the Rockies chipped in money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 The 4 OF where one plays DH idea is fine but I think that just means Avi Garcia is our DH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 07:40 PM) Well the purpose of this thread was to generate ideas for this off season, and I think it has worked so far. Having good, quality discussions on potential players. Thank you. My idea behind CarGo is that he's still young at 28. There's 3 years left on that deal with a good amount of money on it. I look back on it, and maybe it is an overpayment, but if the Rockies chipped in some money, you still know they are going to ask for those types of players, hell probably even Anderson. He had one bad year last year, he hasn't had a year with an OPS under 850 before last year and his rookie year. Yes, he is injury prone, but that is the risk you take to get a quality left handed bat still in his prime. Sorry Joshua that we don't agree, but CarGo is a fit for the White Sox. Especially if the Rockies chipped in money. People are also worried about Cargo cause his home/road splits are pretty one sided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFutureIsNear Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 09:02 PM) People are also worried about Cargo cause his home/road splits are pretty one sided. Bingo. I wouldn't touch Cargo with that contract. Not when he has a career .258/.314/.437 away from Coors. And we are talking a 1385 AB sample size. That's really hard to ignore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 (edited) White Sox sign Chase Headley, 3 yrs 42 M White Sox acquire Matt Joyce for Javy Guerra, Andre Wheeler White Sox acquire Dom Brown for Dayan Viciedo and Chris Beck White Sox sign Brandon Morrow, 1y 7 M, Andrew Miller 3 yrs / 22 M, Luke Hochevar 1 y 4 M w/ option, Andrew Bailey 1 y 3 M Chad Billingsley (minor league deal) White Sox acquire Stephen Vogt for Carlos Sanchez Lineup: CF Eaton 3B Headley RF Garcia 1B Abreu DH Dom Brown 2B Semien LF Matt Joyce SS Alexei C Flowers C Vogt IF Saladino / outside depth piece for ~1M (Ramon Santiago?) IF Gillaspie OF Moises SP Chris Sale SP Jose Quintana SP John Danks SP Hector Noesi SP Brandon Morrow RP A Miller RP Hochevar RP Putnam RP Petricka RP Bassitt RP Bailey RP Snodgress/Surkamp/Webb Room to improve in rotation, Morrow will eventually be hurt, but is good when healthy. Rodon can arrive when the time comes. Danks moved if pitching well, if not, ???. Lineup looks pretty good. should add 45-50 mil or so, a possible contending team. Short contracts for pitchers affords some flexibility. Only positional FA is Matt Joyce, eminently replaceable. not totally unrealistic. Edited October 17, 2014 by daggins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 05:23 PM) You know, if you are going to insult SoxPride and his ideas, the least thing you could do is come up with something better than this when asked to show off your own foolproof plan. Make Smart Decisions... Meaning dont trade away prospects, especially for horrible contracts. Acquire more ML ready prospects. Sign pitching depth in both the bullpen and the rotation. (Especially guys that I can flip at the deadline for prospects a la the Cubs.) Put everyone of value on the block to see what offers are out there. Just make smart baseball and fiancial decisions. And who replied with a +1, this isn't Reddit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted October 17, 2014 Author Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 08:12 PM) Make Smart Decisions... Meaning dont trade away prospects, especially for horrible contracts. Acquire more ML ready prospects. Sign pitching depth in both the bullpen and the rotation. (Especially guys that I can flip at the deadline for prospects a la the Cubs.) Put everyone of value on the block to see what offers are out there. Just make smart baseball and fiancial decisions. And who replied with a +1, this isn't Reddit. Give some ideas of players/trades that would fit your criteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 08:25 PM) Give some ideas of players/trades that would fit your criteria. Trade Quintana for a Top 50 prospect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 08:27 PM) Trade Quintana for a Top 50 prospect At least 2, lets get it right bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted October 17, 2014 Author Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 10:12 PM) At least 2, lets get it right bro. Like who? What would the rotation look like then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 1 Adam Eaton L CF 2 Carlos Sanchez S 2B 3 Jose Abreu R 1B 4 Jay Bruce L RF 5 Avisail Garcia R RF 6 Adam Lind L DH 7 Alexei Ramirez R SS 8 Conor Gillaspie L 3B 9 Tyler Flowers R C BN Marcus Semien R UTIL BN Leury Garcia S UTIL BN Mike Morse R DH/1B/OF BN Adrian Nieto S C 1 Chris Sale L 2 Jose Quintana L 3 Hector Noesi R 4 John Danks L 5 Daniel Corcino R MR Brandon Morrow R MR Jake Petricka R MR Daniel Webb R MR Scott Snodgress L MR Josh Outman L SU Francellis Montas R CL Carlos Rodon L Adam Lind 2 years $18.5m Mike Morse 2 years $9.5m Brandon Morrow 1 year $5.5m Josh Outman 1 year $4.5m Dayan Viciedo, Micah Johnson, Courtney Hawkins to Cincinnati Reds for Jay Bruce, Daniel Corcino. --------------- -Lind and Morse platoon. When facing lefties Morse plays the field for Abreu or Avisail, who themselves slide into the DH spot. -Coin flip really between Semien and Sanchez over who starts the season at 2nd, I picked Sanchez because defense. Whoever doesn't start at 2nd will sub the IF positions. -Open tryouts for 5th starter (or 4th starter); if one fails a new comes up from the minors. -Rookies with great stuff make good bullpen pitchers. When Rodon joins the rotation (which could be midseason...) Montas is ready to move straight to closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Oct 16, 2014 -> 10:12 PM) At least 2, lets get it right bro. Well played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 Giving up Viciedo, who hits 20 HR a year, for Grandal (PLUS WEBB) is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (BaconOnAStick @ Oct 17, 2014 -> 12:24 AM) Giving up Viciedo, who hits 20 HR a year, for Grandal (PLUS WEBB) is silly. And watch me do this from a Padres fan's perspective.... ----- Giving up Grandal, who walks more than twice as much as Viciedo, for only Viciedo (PLUS WEBB) is silly. ----- Put Grandal in US Cellular Field instead of Petco, and he may have hit 20 HR last season too. Viciedo was worth -0.7 wins last year, Grandal worth 1.1 I think Viciedo + Webb would be a pretty fair trade. You could even argue it favors the White Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickofypres Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 (edited) Acquire Headley/Panda, Markakis/Bruce, Grandal/Castro. Fix bullpen. Dispose of Danks, Tank. Sorry for being so vague Edited October 17, 2014 by woods of ypres Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt3515 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 17, 2014 -> 12:14 AM) Small chance of most of these happening but whatever. Sign Headley (4/54), Thatcher (2/10), Hochever (1/3 with a performance based option), Chris B. Young (1/5) and Masterson (1/9). Invite Jesse Crain to camp. Trade Montas, Sanchez and Hawkins for Belt. Trade Viciedo and Webb for Grandal. CF Eaton 2B Semien 1B/LF/DH Belt 1B/DH Abreu 3B Headley RF Garcia DH/1B/LF Gillaspie/Young C Flowers/Grandal SS Ramirez Rotation: Sale, Quintana, Masterson, Danks and Noesi Bullpen: Hochevar, Webb, Putnam, Petricka, Guerra/Crain, Thatcher, Surkamp No on the trade for Belt.. Would rather keep Montas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 I have pointed this out before and will point it out again. LF is likely to open up with Morse going to FA, so Belt will be playing LF should Morse sign elsewhere which is very possible. Unless the Sox are willing to over pay big time, Belt will be playing ball for the Giants year. Belt, as much as I like the idea, is a pipe dream. Simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted October 17, 2014 Share Posted October 17, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (BaconOnAStick @ Oct 17, 2014 -> 12:24 AM) Giving up Viciedo, who hits 20 HR a year, for Grandal (PLUS WEBB) is silly. That would be a great trade for us. And I'd be more worried about Webb coming back to bite us in the ass than Viciedo. Edited October 17, 2014 by Chicago White Sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts