Kyyle23 Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Why do they always come out and say "alcohol wasnt involved" right away, only to have that proven wrong shortly afterwards? They did the same thing with Rob Bironas, its just weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 13, 2014 -> 11:37 AM) Why do they always come out and say "alcohol wasnt involved" right away, only to have that proven wrong shortly afterwards? They did the same thing with Rob Bironas, its just weird. I'm guessing there is some sort of clerical explanation, but I'd rather them be wrong that way than the other way. You'd just assume not slander the dead, knowing that many people will never see the correction. Plus, it feeds the conspiracy theorists when the story is revised to sound not as bad rather than the other way around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 QUOTE (Jake @ Nov 13, 2014 -> 10:43 AM) I'm guessing there is some sort of clerical explanation, but I'd rather them be wrong that way than the other way. You'd just assume not slander the dead, knowing that many people will never see the correction. Plus, it feeds the conspiracy theorists when the story is revised to sound not as bad rather than the other way around How about neither? How about "Cause of death is unknown at this time. Results are pending autopsy/blood test" No need to correct something that isnt stated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.