lasttriptotulsa Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 I have a feeling this is going to be a three team deal with the braves. Sox end up with Upton, Oakland ends up with Gattis, Braves end up with Samardzija. Not sure what the pieces going from the Sox would be but this is the only way it makes sense to me. I just dont see the Sox giving up much for one year of Samardzija unless they could extend him but I think if they're going to spend big time bucks on a starter it isn't going to be Samardzija. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 12:25 AM) FWIW, you guys are right. A lot going on. The next week or two will be very active. Rick and Beane have been in talks all week. Dodgers cooled off. Still heavy talks with Reds and Rockies as well. LOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) If it happens, hoping for 3 way deal, otherwise we'd probably have to give up Micah Or Anderson, right? Edited November 29, 2014 by Brian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDWhiteSoxFan Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 01:53 AM) Would like to see Hahn make a deal for Jesse Chavez. Gillaspie and Micah Johnson for him? You are aware that Chavez is 31 already? I don't think I want Smardjza, 1. I can't even spell his name without looking it up 2 He will likely cost to much in prospects 3. He'd cost to much to keep I like the player don't get me wrong, but not the price it will cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Brian @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:23 AM) If it happens, hoping for 3 way deal, otherwise we'd probably have to give up Micah Or Anderson, right? I think Semien is the guy they'd want. Major-league ready, high OBP/solid power, can play 2B or SS. Seems like a perfect Beane type player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 I want Samardjiza extended so the Sox can exploit a new market inefficiency - guys with unpronounceable last names. Samardjiza, Michelczewski... who's next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (daggins @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:39 AM) I want Samardjiza extended so the Sox can exploit a new market inefficiency - guys with unpronounceable last names. Samardjiza, Michelczewski... who's next? They made a pass at Saltalamacchia last year, too bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Brian @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:23 AM) If it happens, hoping for 3 way deal, otherwise we'd probably have to give up Micah Or Anderson, right? I doubt Hahn would trade Anderson. Micah, maybe, but I think Semien is probably trade bait. They seem to prefer Micah over him. I just don't know what else they would have to give up. I would imagine if it is significant, they, like when they traded for Freddy, would be very confident in an extension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (MDWhiteSoxFan @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:36 AM) You are aware that Chavez is 31 already? I don't think I want Smardjza, 1. I can't even spell his name without looking it up 2 He will likely cost to much in prospects 3. He'd cost to much to keep I like the player don't get me wrong, but not the price it will cost. This is how I feel too, but it really depends on the price and what a possible extension looks like. I'm 100% going the rental route unless it's for spare parts like Sanchez & Beck, which is not going to happen. Compensation picks are nice to have, but are multiple years away from being useful assets. And even if he's willing to agree to an extension, it's got to be something that makes sense for us. I'm talking something like 5/$80M, which I don't seem him accepting. Going above that in terms of years or AAV doesn't make a lot of sense for us. At that point, we might as well go after starters in free agency, because we're starting to approach their price range and they wouldn't cost the talent Shark will to acquire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Lopez's Ghost Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 01:39 AM) Would all depend on who they give up... If a guy like Beck or Danish goes, it doesn't make much sense, IMO. A rotation of: Sale Samardijza Quintana Danks Noesi/Bassit Would look pretty nice this coming year. And then add Rodon mid-year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 12:35 AM) Keep an eye on this. Tried, but I can't confirm it. Lots of moving parts with OAK, including Samardjiza contract, Reddick, relievers...etc. Could be impact deal. I could definitely see a deal with Samardzija/Reddick for prospects or Samardzija/Cook for prospects heading to the Sox. I think that would make the most sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 I think Noesi is locked in to the back of the rotation. He made his starts, and he has room to improve. Getting a full spring training with Cooper should be a good thing. Sale, Samardzija, Quintana, Noesi, Bassitt would be fine if they're able to move Danks and improve the pen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:55 AM) I could definitely see a deal with Samardzija/Reddick for prospects or Samardzija/Cook for prospects heading to the Sox. I think that would make the most sense. Samardzija/Reddick for Viciedo/Semien/?/?...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Brian @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 07:57 AM) Samardzija/Reddick for Viciedo/Semien/?/?...? DEAL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Reddick hasn't been able to hit lefties at all or the last 2 years. Sox have 2 situational lefty hitters already penciled in as starters. Sox need Youth No rents (unless it's for complete spare parts). Shark is someone who might be a nice signing after next season. I wonder what he really turned down from the Cubs? He's not getting near Lester/Scherzer money, but he'll want (and get) 5 years. 5/90 - something like that? Pointless to trade scarce prospects for him this year for the purpose of winning 84 games. Edited November 29, 2014 by GreenSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) No one's going to want Semien, at least not in any meaningful way. He does not have much value right now. Edited November 29, 2014 by Jose Paniagua Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Jose Paniagua @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 08:27 AM) No one's going to want Semien, at least not in any meaningful way. He does not have much value right now. How not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 09:38 AM) How not? I think he's probably right on that...guys who don't break in immediately and tear up the league tend to see their trade value decrease somewhat. Now he's got to prove he can do it in the big leagues, until then he's a guy you'd look at as a "buy low" candidate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lillian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) What is wrong with Alexei for Smardjiza, straight up? The Sox save money this year. They don't have to make a risky long term commitment, on a pitcher. Next year, they may not need "Shark," and if they are still short a starter, perhaps there will be another pitcher available, who is similarly in his final contract year. A #2 or #3 starter, is arguably more valuable than an aging SS, even if he's a good one. Notice, I said good, not great. Just how good Alexei is, seems to be very debatable. Frankly, I thought that he was better than many on this board assert, but the larger point is that a starting pitcher, with Smardjiza's performance capabilities, is worth what Alexei normally produces. The big question is 2016. The Sox would then have neither Smardjiza, nor Alexei, when they could have had their $10 Million, 34 year old SS. (Actually, he will be turning 35 in September of 2016. Is that necessarily bad? Would they really want that much money tied up in an aging SS? If he were a DH, first baseman, or even a corner outfielder, pushing 35 might not be too old. However, at SS his range is likely not going to be more than average, at best. And, remember that while he is a good hitter, he is nothing special for $10 million. If he were not providing considerably better than average defense, at that point, there would probably be better options available, especially for the money. Between all of the options available within the organization, and players who might be available then, I'd take my chances on finding a replacement for Alexei. Anderson will likely be ready by 2016, unless his defense is still rough. In the meantime, we can all argue about who the SS would be this season. Providing they land another solid bat, to fill the other outfield hole, I'd personally prefer the best fielding SS available, and not worry much about his offense. However, having that solid RH starter represents the answer to one of this team's most glaring needs. He and Quintana could very well perform about the same, and provide two #2's, to round out our top 3 starters. Then, when Rodon arrives, you could have a staff that makes the Sox a serious contender. The money available after removing Alexei's $10 million, minus whatever "Shark" gets in arbitration, should be sufficient to land a solid hitting outfielder, with adequate defense, and even leave a little "change" left over, for another bullpen arm. Therefore, such a scenario just might be the way that the Sox put together a competitive team for this season, without having to go over their budget, and without giving up any of their young core, going forward. Edited November 29, 2014 by Lillian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Yes, I absolutely have zero problem having 2/$20 tied up in a contract for a "aging" shortstop who is going into his age 33-34 seasons and has constantly outproduced his contract during every year of the deal. "We could all debate who would be the SS this season" - think about how silly that is. You open up a hole you have no one to fill by trading for a RHP who fills a need this season but who is then either gone as a FA or commanding a 9 figure contract the White Sox are very unlikely to give out. That is exactly backwards. Samardzija earned $5.3 million last year in his 2nd arb year. He vastly outperformed that deal and will probably command $8-$10 million in arbitration this year. You say that the difference between Samardzija's money and Alexei's would be enough to land a solid hitting OF, what solid hitting OF would be available for $1-$2 million at most? This tells me you didn't really look at the numbers either. None of that works or makes sense. It barely saves the Sox money, it opens up a gaping hole at the most important defensive position on the diamond, and it costs us a year of control for a guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Lopez's Ghost Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (Lillian @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 10:22 AM) What is wrong with Alexei for Smardjiza, straight up? The Sox save money this year. They don't have to make a risky long term commitment, on a pitcher. Next year, they may not need "Shark," and if they are still short a starter, perhaps there will be another pitcher available, who is similarly in his final contract year. A #2 or #3 starter, is arguably more valuable than an aging SS, even if he's a good one. Notice, I said good, not great. Just how good Alexei is, seems to be very debatable. Frankly, I thought that he was better than many on this board assert, but the larger point is that a starting pitcher, with Smardjiza's performance capabilities, is worth what Alexei normally produces. The big question is 2016. The Sox would then have neither Smardjiza, nor Alexei, when they could have had their $10 Million, 34 year old SS. (Actually, he will be turning 35 in September of 2016. Is that necessarily bad? Would they really want that much money tied up in an aging SS? If he were a DH, first baseman, or even a corner outfielder, pushing 35 might not be too old. However, at SS his range is likely not going to be more than average, at best. And, remember that while he is a good hitter, he is nothing special for $10 million. If he were not providing considerably better than average defense, at that point, there would probably be better options available, especially for the money. Between all of the options available within the organization, and players who might be available then, I'd take my chances on finding a replacement for Alexei. Anderson will likely be ready by 2016, unless his defense is still rough. In the meantime, we can all argue about who the SS would be this season. Providing they land another solid bat, to fill the other outfield hole, I'd personally prefer the best fielding SS available, and not worry much about his offense. However, having that solid RH starter represents the answer to one of this team's most glaring needs. He and Quintana could very well perform about the same, and provide two #2's, to round out our top 3 starters. Then, when Rodon arrives, you could have a staff that makes the Sox a serious contender. The money available after removing Alexei's $10 million, minus whatever "Shark" gets in arbitration, should be sufficient to land a solid hitting outfielder, with adequate defense, and even leave a little "change" left over, for another bullpen arm. Therefore, such a scenario just might be the way that the Sox put together a competitive team for this season, without having to go over their budget, and without giving up any of their young core, going forward. Amen, sister. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 I want Samardjiza extended so the Sox can exploit a new market inefficiency - guys with unpronounceable last names. Samardjiza, Michelczewski... who's next? Royals once acquired Grudzielanek and Minentkiewicz within a day or so of each other. I hear the clubhouse uniform guy quit the next day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cabiness42 Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Yes, I absolutely have zero problem having 2/$20 tied up in a contract for a "aging" shortstop who is going into his age 33-34 seasons and has constantly outproduced his contract during every year of the deal. "We could all debate who would be the SS this season" - think about how silly that is. You open up a hole you have no one to fill by trading for a RHP who fills a need this season but who is then either gone as a FA or commanding a 9 figure contract the White Sox are very unlikely to give out. That is exactly backwards. Samardzija earned $5.3 million last year in his 2nd arb year. He vastly outperformed that deal and will probably command $8-$10 million in arbitration this year. You say that the difference between Samardzija's money and Alexei's would be enough to land a solid hitting OF, what solid hitting OF would be available for $1-$2 million at most? This tells me you didn't really look at the numbers either. None of that works or makes sense. It barely saves the Sox money, it opens up a gaping hole at the most important defensive position on the diamond, and it costs us a year of control for a guy. The only way the Sox even think about giving up Alexei for Jeff is if there is a negotiated extension for Jeff, and even then they may not do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lillian Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 (edited) Sorry, I misspoke. I meant to say that the money saved on Alexei's salary, minus Samardjiza's arbitration salary, plus what they have already earmarked as available. I must admit that I did not, however, expect Samardjiza to get $8 to $10 Million in arbitration. Is that a realistic number? Nevertheless, I'd still consider that trade, primarily because I put a big premium on quality pitching at a reasonable salary, without a risky, long term obligation. The Sox have several middle infielders who appear ready for a shot at the Majors. I would think that one of them would be able to at least fill the SS void. He wouldn't have to be one of the best players on the team, but rather someone who could play solid defense, and bat at the bottom of the order. Edited November 29, 2014 by Lillian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 29, 2014 -> 09:38 AM) How not? What Semien has going for him is some BABIP-fueled minor league stats. First full MLB year was a failure. Beane will not pay us for 2014 Clutch Moments. Semien did walk in the minors, but not here. He's 24, the farm thing is done. The defense is considered limited besides his speed. Because of the minor league stats i'd see you getting a decent cost controlled reliever-type basically at this point at the absolute most. Semien is not a prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.