Baron Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Isnt Duke the guy at the end of the movie Major League? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (shysocks @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 07:05 PM) Yeah it was. Without looking it up, assuming he meant what it would read if the "(80 percent)" was omitted: Duke allowed 20 percent to score, Sox allowed 32 percent to score. The Sox bullpen holding only 32% of inherited runners seems like it would be an apocalyptic number. Doubt this is a three-year contract as some have guessed. I'm guessing 2/$9. Fine with the signing and even if his K-rate isn't real he has the ground ball chops that we've trended towards. Better this than Miller. It felt apocalyptic much of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 A brief on Duke: Your browser does not support iframes. This was October of 2012 with the Nationals. Notice the 3/4 arm angle and how long the batter can see the ball. He gets the guy out, but with so much time to see the ball, you are going to make much better contact with the ball. Pitchers can still be successful, but they won't get strikeouts with the stuff Duke has. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in September for the Reds of 2013. Notice that he's dropped down and does a much better job of keeping the ball behind him. His breaking ball also has a much better sweeping motion to it. This seems to be a change he made while rehabbing or pitching in the minors of 2013. His splits after coming back up in 2013: .205/.244/.308, though the K% wasn't there yet. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in May of 2014. He's still coming from the side, but he's even sped up getting the ball to the plate. It comes in at 91 but with the inability to see it, it looks a lot faster than that. --- I could see this backfiring, but I'm really OK with this move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thxfrthmmrs Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (jasonxctf @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:04 PM) yeah i saw that too. messed up wording by Dan Hayes. I think he meant that Duke allowed 20% to score, which the Sox allowed 68%. I think he meant 32% for Sox. If you allow 68% (2/3) of the inherited runners to score, you're the worst bullpen in history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (shipps @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:07 PM) A bird. Ahh well I'll take the bird's word for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (flavum @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 11:46 AM) Let's make some guesses... 3 yrs/ 11.5. Too low? I am going to guess 3/17, including a $1 million buyout option for a 4th year at $7 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:11 PM) A brief on Duke: Your browser does not support iframes. This was October of 2012 with the Nationals. Notice the 3/4 arm angle and how long the batter can see the ball. He gets the guy out, but with so much time to see the ball, you are going to make much better contact with the ball. Pitchers can still be successful, but they won't get strikeouts with the stuff Duke has. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in September for the Reds of 2013. Notice that he's dropped down and does a much better job of keeping the ball behind him. His breaking ball also has a much better sweeping motion to it. This seems to be a change he made while rehabbing or pitching in the minors of 2013. His splits after coming back up in 2013: .205/.244/.308, though the K% wasn't there yet. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in May of 2014. He's still coming from the side, but he's even sped up getting the ball to the plate. It comes in at 91 but with the inability to see it, it looks a lot faster than that. --- I could see this backfiring, but I'm really OK with this move. Nice work Wite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Supposedly it is multi year and from what I was reading the other team involved was the Mets and they weren't willing to go 2 years. So I would imagine it is fairly cheap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 (edited) Would it be reasonable to say a relief pitcher will pitch 60-70 innings of a possible 1,450 total team-pitched innings? That makes 10M a year seem crazy for MR. 4% of total innings for 10% of payroll? Edited November 18, 2014 by Jerksticks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:11 PM) A brief on Duke: Your browser does not support iframes. This was October of 2012 with the Nationals. Notice the 3/4 arm angle and how long the batter can see the ball. He gets the guy out, but with so much time to see the ball, you are going to make much better contact with the ball. Pitchers can still be successful, but they won't get strikeouts with the stuff Duke has. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in September for the Reds of 2013. Notice that he's dropped down and does a much better job of keeping the ball behind him. His breaking ball also has a much better sweeping motion to it. This seems to be a change he made while rehabbing or pitching in the minors of 2013. His splits after coming back up in 2013: .205/.244/.308, though the K% wasn't there yet. Your browser does not support iframes. This was in May of 2014. He's still coming from the side, but he's even sped up getting the ball to the plate. It comes in at 91 but with the inability to see it, it looks a lot faster than that. --- I could see this backfiring, but I'm really OK with this move. I gather from the titles of those videos that he gets out of a lot of jams... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 (edited) Really hope they add another left hander to the pen. If it's miller then I would ok with this deal otherwise I'm worried. Sox haven't had good luck signing good left handed reliever. Hopefully he doesn't turn into will ohman or scott downs. Hopefully he doesn't continue his jekyll and hyde seasons. I guess time will tell Edited November 18, 2014 by WhiteSoxLifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasox24 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:58 PM) I'm confused by the way he wrote this. So did Zach Duke "allow" 20% of inherited runners to score, and the white sox 32%? Or did Duke "hold" 80% of runners and White Sox only 32%? Confusing switching of terminology there. I read it as the former. He only allowed 20% of inherited while the Sox allowed 32%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:11 PM) Ahh well I'll take the bird's word for it. Apparently you have heard that the bird is the word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:19 PM) Really hope they add another left hander to the pen. If it's miller then I would ok with this deal otherwise it's I'm worried. Sox haven't had good luck signing good left handed reliever. Hopefully he doesn't turn into will ohman or scott downs. Hopefully he doesn't continue his jekyll and hyde seasons. I guess time will tell I'd give them a one in a million shot of signing Andrew Miller at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:15 PM) Would it be reasonable to say a relief pitcher will pitch 60-70 innings of a possible 1,450 total team-pitched innings? That makes 10M a year seem crazy for MR. 4% of total innings for 10% of payroll? I agree with you, but the counterarguments would be: 1) A reliever pitches higher leverage situations, when every out or baserunner potentially has a much higher impact on the game's outcome. 2) A reliever's innings are generally more effective than a starter's, for any number of reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (pittshoganerkoff @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:21 PM) Apparently you have heard that the bird is the word. Well played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:12 PM) I am going to guess 3/17, including a $1 million buyout option for a 4th year at $7 million. That would be very risky, can't approve of anything over two years. He was cut halfway through 2013 with an 8.01 ERA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:22 PM) I'd give them a one in a million shot of signing Andrew Miller at this point. Will you eat a hat if they sign him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:22 PM) I'd give them a one in a million shot of signing Andrew Miller at this point. So its a 99.9999% no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:22 PM) Will you eat a hat if they sign him? Yes. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:23 PM) So its a 99.9999% no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:22 PM) I'd give them a one in a million shot of signing Andrew Miller at this point. So you're saying there's a chance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royoung Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I like it. He throws with his left-hand correct? Perfect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Anyone think they may have something else to announce later as well? What's the point of waiting to announce it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Nov 18, 2014 -> 12:31 PM) Anyone think they may have something else to announce later as well? What's the point of waiting to announce it? Jerry has to find some pants and change out of his leopard print bathrobe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
professa Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Sox definitely checked in on what has lead to Duke's success...No way they hand out a multiyear contract without evidence of a change mechanically in his delivery, in his repertoire, or his mentality. I think his is a great signing. Since moving to the pen in 2012, his FIP from that point on is 2.81, even if you include the seasons when his era is 6+ and 8+. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.