LDF Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 09:52 PM) Shelby Miller isn't anywhere near as good as Jose Quintana and, at their peaks, I'd say Heyward is slightly better than Bruce. Bruce is coming off the worst season of his career. Frankly, if it were up to me, and they said "we want Quintana," I'd hang up the phone. kind of subtle ..... but i like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 02:52 PM) Shelby Miller isn't anywhere near as good as Jose Quintana and, at their peaks, I'd say Heyward is slightly better than Bruce. Bruce is coming off the worst season of his career. Frankly, if it were up to me, and they said "we want Quintana," I'd hang up the phone. Plus the value of Q's dirt cheap contract that keeps him under team control through 2018 with team options on Q for 2019/2020. Its not Q+ for Bruce, its Bruce+ for Q or like you said, hang up the phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (StRoostifer @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 04:49 PM) Plus the value of Q's dirt cheap contract that keeps him under team control through 2018 with team options on Q for 2019/2020. Its not Q+ for Bruce, its Bruce+ for Q or like you said, hang up the phone. The value Quintana brings to the table is insane both intrinsically and extrinsically. Frankly, I was struggling whether or not I'd deal him for Giancarlo Stanton 2-3 months ago and then Stanton went and signed a $325 million deal. I'm definitely not trading Quintana for him now, not when he's going to cost $300 million more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 10:55 PM) The value Quintana brings to the table is insane both intrinsically and extrinsically. Frankly, I was struggling whether or not I'd deal him for Giancarlo Stanton 2-3 months ago and then Stanton went and signed a $325 million deal. I'm definitely not trading Quintana for him now, not when he's going to cost $300 million more. a nice thought all around. but like it was said the other day on the dodgers talk. the rtn for Alexei is huge, I could envision the same being said on Q as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pettie4sox Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Q will be on the next White Sox playoff team. /thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 02:55 PM) The value Quintana brings to the table is insane both intrinsically and extrinsically. Frankly, I was struggling whether or not I'd deal him for Giancarlo Stanton 2-3 months ago and then Stanton went and signed a $325 million deal. I'm definitely not trading Quintana for him now, not when he's going to cost $300 million more. Well, to be fair, for the same term, it would be more like $60 million more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 05:25 PM) Well, to be fair, for the same term, it would be more like $60 million more Then you would be left with the same issues the Angels and Dodgers are having with Hamilton, Pujols, Ethier, Kemp and Crawford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 03:31 PM) Then you would be left with the same issues the Angels and Dodgers are having with Hamilton, Pujols, Ethier, Kemp and Crawford. Not necessarily. First, he's not going to be 34 until 2025 Secondly, $30 million in 12 years may likely not be as penal then as it would seem today. Thirdly, he could opt out in 2020. But I smell what you are stepping in Edited November 21, 2014 by iamshack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 the sox are definitely in an enviable position. they have there main players spread out and sign to nice contract. I keep seeing how the Phillies, Dodgers, and some others teams who have a burdensome contract with some players and can't get rid of them. I want to shout out now, but the sox are no where near that problem, just yet. so if it come to be, the sox do get Bruce, let him play out his contract and go the FA route. offer him a QO and get a draft pick the young prospects the sox have, will be needing room to come on up. let the natural attrition of players leaving happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 (edited) QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 04:55 PM) The value Quintana brings to the table is insane both intrinsically and extrinsically. Frankly, I was struggling whether or not I'd deal him for Giancarlo Stanton 2-3 months ago and then Stanton went and signed a $325 million deal. I'm definitely not trading Quintana for him now, not when he's going to cost $300 million more. I remember that Wite and I'm with you on that. Only two things couldl get me on board with the idea of trading Q. 1- the Sox end up admitting they are going to continue to draft/ trade for and develope more talent for one more season thus likely not be contenders in 2015 ( I doubt they will anyway) and 2- it would have to be for a package of top prospects that were within a year of so of being MLB contributors. Guys like Seager, Pederson and possibly Urias, though I think Urias' talent is ahead of his arm endurance and will spend a few more seasons in the minors building up innings even though his stuff is just about MLB ready now according to things I've recently read. IMHO, trading Q for three years of Bruce who is coming off of his worst season as a MLB ball player is just a stupid dumb f***in idea man. I believe that in the business world you have to maintain good relations, speak well and carry yourself well but if Cincy's GM called me proposing Q + for Bruce, I would fly out to Cincy to cuss his ass out, whoop his rooty tooth candy ass, throw him into the back of my car and drop him off at a pig farm. And that's if I'm in a good mood. Edited November 22, 2014 by StRoostifer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (StRoostifer @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 11:55 PM) I remember that Wite and I'm with you on that. Only two things couldld get me on board with the idea of trading Q. 1- the Sox end up admitting they are going to continue to draft/ trade for and develope more talent for one more season thus likely not be contenders in 2015 ( I doubt they will anyway) and 2- it would have to be for a package of top prospects that were within a year of so of being MLB contributors. Guys like Seager, Pederson and possibly Urias, though I think Urias' talent is ahead of his arm endurance and will spend a few more seasons in the minors building up innings even though his stuff is just about MLB ready now according to things I've recently read. IMHO, trading Q for three years of Bruce who is coming off of his worst season as a MLB ball player is just a stupid dumb f***in idea man. I believe that in the business world you have to maintain good relations, speak well and carry yourself well but if Cincy's GM called me proposing Q + for Bruce, I would fly out to Cincy to cuss his ass out, whoop his rooty tooth candy ass, throw him into the back of my car and drop him off at a pig farm. And that's if I'm in a good mood. let me ask this, but let me say this first. I do not want to trade Q. if the sox makes a trade for a prize piece of a missing part of a puzzle, the sox will need to make that trade. I don't know if Bruce is that piece or not. next the sox will of course continue to draft to replenish the system, that is understood. now I may have misread your intention on the bolded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (LDF @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 06:02 PM) let me ask this, but let me say this first. I do not want to trade Q. if the sox makes a trade for a prize piece of a missing part of a puzzle, the sox will need to make that trade. I don't know if Bruce is that piece or not. next the sox will of course continue to draft to replenish the system, that is understood. now I may have misread your intention on the bolded. I have three problems with trading Q for Bruce. 1- Q+ is the proposal and I don't care who says what, Bruce does not have Q's value so what is the deal with the Sox giving up Q+ for Bruce? 2- if the Sox are going to trade an insanely valuable asset like Q, why for a player coming off of his worst year ever as a major leaguer? Just dumb. 3- The Sox have but two reliable pitchers the rotation and trading one of them is lights years beyond moronic. May as well trade Sale and Abreu and have a top farm like the cubs/ BoSox and Cards. I'm not against trading any player but the trade has to be a smart trade and as I've said, Q+ for Bruce is an idiot trade. Hahn would be crucified and justly so. If in fact Cincy's GM asked for Q+ in return for Bruce, I would feed him to the pigs myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Nov 20, 2014 -> 08:21 PM) Early. Revisiting talks. Might take Q + Hahn should hang up the phone laughing if Q is even mentioned, let alone +. Q is a 5+ WAR pitcher. A 3-ish WAR OF is not worth a 5+ WAR LHSP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (StRoostifer @ Nov 22, 2014 -> 12:13 AM) I have three problems with trading Q for Bruce. 1- Q+ is the proposal and I don't care who says what, Bruce does not have Q's value so what is the deal with the Sox giving up Q+ for Bruce? 2- if the Sox are going to trade an insanely valuable asset like Q, why for a player coming off of his worst year ever as a major leaguer? Just dumb. 3- The Sox have but two reliable pitchers the rotation and trading one of them is lights years beyond moronic. May as well trade Sale and Abreu and have a top farm like the cubs/ BoSox and Cards. I'm not against trading any player but the trade has to be a smart trade and as I've said, Q+ for Bruce is an idiot trade. Hahn would be crucified and justly so. If in fact Cincy's GM asked for Q+ in return for Bruce, I would feed him to the pigs myself. for me, #1 I agree, however the baseball pro's may have other thoughts. #2 is just an extension of 1. #3 I think the sox brass knows there is a limited time of assembling a good team to compete. I trust them they have a pict and a game plan and I am sure they are following it. I agree about the value of Q, btw nice way of getting rid of a body without any traces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 Just throwing it out there, but the Nationals are reportedly making their starters available to make a run at Scherzer. This whole Q+ thing gets me thinking of Bruce and one of Fister/Zimermann/Strasburg. I think the Nationals could be that third team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 22, 2014 -> 12:30 AM) Just throwing it out there, but the Nationals are reportedly making their starters available to make a run at Scherzer. This whole Q+ thing gets me thinking of Bruce and one of Fister/Zimermann/Strasburg. I think the Nationals could be that third team. interesting...... but how can the sox help there beside Q. what will come back to the sox?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (LDF @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 06:33 PM) interesting...... but how can the sox help there beside Q. what will come back to the sox?? To Sox OF Jay Bruce SP Zimmermann/Fister/Strasburg To Reds SP Jose Quintana To Nationals Top prospects from Sox and Reds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWSpalehoseCWS Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 There is no way the Nats are going to trade Strasburg and in order to go after Scherzer. For one, the fans would form a mob. And a 1-2 punch of those two in a rotation is downright nasty. If they are going to shed salary, it's going to be Fister or Zimmermann. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (CWSpalehoseCWS @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 06:41 PM) There is no way the Nats are going to trade Strasburg and in order to go after Scherzer. For one, the fans would form a mob. And a 1-2 punch of those two in a rotation is downright nasty. If they are going to shed salary, it's going to be Fister or Zimmermann. I agree, just throwing it out there. I would love Zimmermann (with an extension) and Bruce in a Sox uniform. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 06:45 PM) I agree, just throwing it out there. I would love Zimmermann (with an extension) and Bruce in a Sox uniform. Would you trade q for Bryce Harper? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 07:02 PM) Would you trade q for Bryce Harper? I would. That is one gamble I would make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 (edited) Sox get Jay Bruce Reds get Jordan Zimmermann, Dayan Viciedo Nats get 2 of these three: Danish, Montas, Adams Nats get the salary relief they so desperately crave to sign Scherzer. Reds get their good SP. Sox get their LF. Edited November 22, 2014 by Alexeihyeess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (Alexeihyeess @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 07:21 PM) Sox get Jay Bruce Reds get Jordan Zimmermann, Dayan Viciedo Nats get 2 of these three: Danish, Montas, Adams Nats get the salary relief they so desperately crave to sign Scherzer. Reds get their good SP. Sox get their LF. Reds aren't looking to add payroll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 07:22 PM) Reds aren't looking to add payroll. It would be really interesting to have a team gamble and have an entire rotation going to become free agents after the season. Performance tends to peak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted November 22, 2014 Share Posted November 22, 2014 QUOTE (Alexeihyeess @ Nov 21, 2014 -> 05:21 PM) Sox get Jay Bruce Reds get Jordan Zimmermann, Dayan Viciedo Nats get 2 of these three: Danish, Montas, Adams Nats get the salary relief they so desperately crave to sign Scherzer. Reds get their good SP. Sox get their LF. I don't think the Nats are looking to move Zimmerman for a bunch of guys who won't help them this year. I also don't think they would trade Zimmerman for all three of those guys you mentioned, let alone 2 of the three. I think the Sox would strong consider trading 2 of the 3 + Viciedo for Bruce though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.