CrimsonWeltall Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 QUOTE (JenksIsMyHero @ Jun 30, 2016 -> 09:30 PM) Apparently it's based on ineffective assistance of counsel because she didn't cross examine the prosecution expert on the cell phone data.... I kinda have a problem with that. The jury found an eye witness, Jay, credible. A judge 15 years later shouldn't be overturning that. It had nothing to do with the cell phone data cross examination. Counsel was ruled ineffective because her voice was so annoying that every jury member blocked her out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Jun 30, 2016 -> 04:34 PM) It had nothing to do with the cell phone data cross examination. Counsel was ruled ineffective because her voice was so annoying that every jury member blocked her out. I have no idea if that's true but I hope it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.