Bob Sacamano Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 16, 2014 -> 12:02 PM) I'd prefer Kodos. Was that joke made yet? I see what you did there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Any chance the Sox get this guy? If he can be a .750-.800 OPS guy, he'd be a great 2B starter/3B platoon partner with Gillaspie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WKamm Posted December 19, 2014 Share Posted December 19, 2014 He might be a good option at 2b. That will give Sanchez another year to develop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted December 19, 2014 Author Share Posted December 19, 2014 QUOTE (WKamm @ Dec 18, 2014 -> 06:14 PM) He might be a good option at 2b. That will give Sanchez another year to develop. There's already a thread for this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 There's a winning posting fee out there. Padres and Mets are not in the picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Jon Heyman @JonHeymanCBS 3h3 hours ago Manhattan, NY we do not know the winning bidder for the ss Kang for about $5M but can say i have heard it is NOT the oh-so-active padres Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFutureIsNear Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 This guy would make a lot of sense if our scouts think he can play both 3B and 2B. A RH hitter with some pop who can platoon at both 2b and 3b would be ideal for our team right now. 3/15M is nothing compared to what some of these mediocre MLB vets are getting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Rumors are that it is Toronto, but no good source as of yet. We are METSBelievers @METSBelievers 1h1 hour ago The winning bid on Kang from an unidentified team was: $5,002,015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Dang. Stupid Keppinger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Jays reporter said not Toronto. So from reports we know it isn't SD, Mets, Yankees, Toronto. Still not a good word on who won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 2. 2014 -> 12:08 PM) Jays reporter said not Toronto. So from reports we know it isn't SD, Mets, Yankees, Toronto. Still not a good word on who won. Wow 4 teams I predicted to possibly win. I think either us or Oakland could be one of the teams since he can get at bats at second and third. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 10:14 AM) Wow 4 teams I predicted to possibly win. I think either us or Oakland could be one of the teams since he can get at bats at second and third. Well, we're certainly in the running then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 12:08 PM) Jays reporter said not Toronto. So from reports we know it isn't SD, Mets, Yankees, Toronto. Still not a good word on who won. Looks like No Orioles as well. Another one I wonder if could jump in is the Cubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 06:21 PM) Looks like No Orioles as well. Another one I wonder if could jump in is the Cubs. Wouldn't make much sense for the Cubs unless they were planning on trading Baez or Russell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 01:25 PM) Wouldn't make much sense for the Cubs unless they were planning on trading Baez or Russell. ALL THE INFIELDERS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Wait...with those all cut out the Sox actually make a lot of sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 12:25 PM) Wouldn't make much sense for the Cubs unless they were planning on trading Baez or Russell. Assets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Has there even been any speculation of us being interested? He could make some sense for us dependng on the price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 12:47 PM) Has there even been any speculation of us being interested? He could make some sense for us dependng on the price. No speculation from our organization never means anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 12:08 PM) Jays reporter said not Toronto. So from reports we know it isn't SD, Mets, Yankees, Toronto. Still not a good word on who won. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 12:21 PM) Looks like No Orioles as well. Another one I wonder if could jump in is the Cubs. Not the Angels either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 01:15 PM) Not the Angels either. Another domino. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 If it was the Sox they would've let Nightengale or Levine know already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Dec 20, 2014 -> 01:17 PM) Another domino. Also not the Dodgers according to Dylan Hernandez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 What a mystery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 So how many teams are officially out so far? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.