Jump to content

Jordan Danks DFA, Phillies claim him


flavum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Vance Law @ Jan 8, 2015 -> 10:12 PM)
Good lord, Melky should not/ will not be going anywhere near CF. The outfield defense projects to be very subpar at the corners with Cabrera and Garcia. It is a clear deficiency on the team and 'excellent defensive outfielder' is a wise use of one of the bench spots in my opinion (and I suspect others'). If not Danks, I hope they get someone who is a plus defender, like Danks.

 

The Sox don't play in Comerica or Safeco, they play in US Cell. Hitting is marginally more important than outfield defense. There just isn't a lot of room.

 

It's going to be very hard to find a better replacement CF for Eaton than Melky. If you're talking about the handful of innings a "defensive specialist" will get, that role just isn't that important to worry about. One thing Jordan Danks isn't, is anything above replacement. We shouldn't get caught up his utility as a defender because much like Viciedo, any value he brings in one area is more than negated overall.

 

The Sox could still bring in a Danks like player as a NRI in spring, but it's hardly a critical spot. Talking a .5 win swing at absolute most imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jan 8, 2015 -> 10:44 PM)
The Sox don't play in Comerica or Safeco, they play in US Cell. Hitting is marginally more important than outfield defense. There just isn't a lot of room.

 

It's going to be very hard to find a better replacement CF for Eaton than Melky. If you're talking about the handful of innings a "defensive specialist" will get, that role just isn't that important to worry about. One thing Jordan Danks isn't, is anything above replacement. We shouldn't get caught up his utility as a defender because much like Viciedo, any value he brings in one area is more than negated overall.

 

The Sox could still bring in a Danks like player as a NRI in spring, but it's hardly a critical spot. Talking a .5 win swing at absolute most imo.

 

If we get to the place where that spot is impacting us, we'll be able to make a move to rectify it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for some reason when I think of Jordan Danks, I think of Jimmy Landis. About the

same build. Jimmy was the better hitter but not by much. When I think of Viviedo

I think of thick between the ears, no basis for fact, but I suspect his IQ is not very

high. thanks, douglas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (oldsox @ Jan 8, 2015 -> 08:36 PM)
Anyway. Twice in one two-sentence paragraph is too much. I thought they would have taught you this in Admin School.

 

The Admin school curriculum isn't nearly as strict as the Grumpy Old Guy School curriculum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Douglas Rome @ Jan 9, 2015 -> 11:16 AM)
for some reason when I think of Jordan Danks, I think of Jimmy Landis. About the

same build. Jimmy was the better hitter but not by much. When I think of Viviedo

I think of thick between the ears, no basis for fact, but I suspect his IQ is not very

high. thanks, douglas

 

now you are talking about DV problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Jan 9, 2015 -> 12:19 PM)
Didn't the Sox expose Jordan a couple years ago to every other team and nobody bit? At that point there was still a question as to whether he could hit MLB pitching. Now there is no question, he can't. That should tell you his value.

 

at some time during a season, esp when the sox are not winning, a majority of players

gets expose to the waiver list. just to see if someone will jump and maybe work out a

trade. that is how the sox got Rios.

 

so i am sure, by this, he prob did get expose in the waiver list.

 

now there are some players that may never get expose b/c of their importance

to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ptatc @ Jan 8, 2015 -> 10:15 PM)
From what I saw, I don't think Wilkins has a prayer in the MLB. The projections may be right but the swing and miss capacity of wilkins was astounding. Not that Danks is going to be any good at hitting but the comment that Wilkins is obviously alot better is not correct.

 

I think passing judgment that quickly on a guy is the wrong way to go. I don't think he's a future star by any stretch of the imagination, but I think he's a safer bet if LaRoche goes down with an injury than Danks is to mimic that production.

 

Anywayz, it [hopefully] won't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ptatc @ Jan 8, 2015 -> 10:15 PM)
From what I saw, I don't think Wilkins has a prayer in the MLB. The projections may be right but the swing and miss capacity of wilkins was astounding. Not that Danks is going to be any good at hitting but the comment that Wilkins is obviously alot better is not correct.

 

He didn't look like he had any confidence at all. He looked very intimidated to me. Maybe that changes next time in the bigs for Wilkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 9, 2015 -> 10:17 AM)
He didn't look like he had any confidence at all. He looked very intimidated to me. Maybe that changes next time in the bigs for Wilkins.

 

I thought his timing looked off or his bat was slow, but players can be OK with those, just not world beaters. I think if he were given a full season, he'd be exactly OK...probably a below average hitter but with a few home runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Douglas Rome @ Jan 9, 2015 -> 11:16 AM)
for some reason when I think of Jordan Danks, I think of Jimmy Landis. About the

same build. Jimmy was the better hitter but not by much. When I think of Viviedo

I think of thick between the ears, no basis for fact, but I suspect his IQ is not very

high. thanks, douglas

 

I think my Brian Anderson comparison is the true one. Wasn't Jim Landis a damn good hitter/player? I don't know about Viciedo being dumb. That's a new one. It's pretty annoying that he's not more selective at the plate. When he connects he hits them so hard and far, but he rarely connects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (greg775 @ Jan 9, 2015 -> 06:46 PM)
I think my Brian Anderson comparison is the true one. Wasn't Jim Landis a damn good hitter/player? I don't know about Viciedo being dumb. That's a new one. It's pretty annoying that he's not more selective at the plate. When he connects he hits them so hard and far, but he rarely connects.

 

with ref to DV, it isn't that he is dumb, it is he will not listen to

anyone who will try to coach him. esp on his swing. in the beginning

he did, then he stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we're not forgetting that Rios sucked couldn't hit his way out of a paper bag?

How many guys has the Sox gave lots of money to and they were total slugs?

Rios, Kipling, Manny, Dunn, the list goes on. I can't get it out of my mind that

the big dummy is sitting in Texas on 54 million bucks. thanks, douglas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Douglas Rome @ Jan 10, 2015 -> 04:06 AM)
we're not forgetting that Rios sucked couldn't hit his way out of a paper bag?

How many guys has the Sox gave lots of money to and they were total slugs?

Rios, Kipling, Manny, Dunn, the list goes on. I can't get it out of my mind that

the big dummy is sitting in Texas on 54 million bucks. thanks, douglas

 

Rudyard?

 

Rios was a waiver claim. The Blue Jays were the ones to give him that money. He performed well in 2010 and 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...