Jump to content

2015-2016 NFL Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Aug 5, 2015 -> 06:20 PM)
I say do everything possible to keep Jay upright. A, it helps us really see what we get with him (I'm hoping we finally run a balanced attack to his strength's, which hopefully minimizes turnovers) and B, if Jay still can't do it, having a strong line only puts whomever you draft / bring in to be in the best possible position to succeed.

My thoughts exactly. The more we can keep the ball on the ground, the less it's in Jay's hands to make a stupid turnover. And when we do pass, we can mix in play-action to freeze the defense, which again, makes it less likely for Jay to turn it over. Though, he's always going to have his WTF moments. That's just Jay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 11:17 AM)
he has to be done, right? Minimum of a year, but would anyone even sign him after. This guy is literally Alonzo Spellman messed up.

 

i would think so, but I thought that i remembered after Ray Rice(when everything changed in the punishments) that things were almost reset in reference to previous punishments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (dasox24 @ Aug 6, 2015 -> 02:14 PM)
My thoughts exactly. The more we can keep the ball on the ground, the less it's in Jay's hands to make a stupid turnover. And when we do pass, we can mix in play-action to freeze the defense, which again, makes it less likely for Jay to turn it over. Though, he's always going to have his WTF moments. That's just Jay.

The problem is the defense sucks so running the ball into punts is going to make it a very lopsided game quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hoping that even if the d still will give up more yards per game, the pressure/scheme can provide more turnovers.

 

But we got too used to running = 2/3 yrds or less. Running should not mean conceding the offensive possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 11:59 AM)
I am hoping that even if the d still will give up more yards per game, the pressure/scheme can provide more turnovers.

 

But we got too used to running = 2/3 yrds or less. Running should not mean conceding the offensive possession.

It shouldnt but we've seen our running game the last year or so. Im hoping it was pure coaching that led to the line not being able to block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 12:01 PM)
I'm struggling to get up my excitement levels for the Bears this year, I have no faith in them to be anything but bad.

 

I just want to see progress in each phase. After last year, that shouldnt be too tall of a task

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 12:00 PM)
It shouldnt but we've seen our running game the last year or so. Im hoping it was pure coaching that led to the line not being able to block.

 

Well, Slauson was also injured, and Garza was a terrible run blocker. So we hope to have improved there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 12:01 PM)
I'm struggling to get up my excitement levels for the Bears this year, I have no faith in them to be anything but bad.

 

There are things to root for this year that were not there last year. I can handle and enjoy even losses if they are for a purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Aug 7, 2015 -> 12:00 PM)
It shouldnt but we've seen our running game the last year or so. Im hoping it was pure coaching that led to the line not being able to block.

My point was based on signing Evan Mathis and kicking out Long to RT. If you do that, then you have 2 Pro Bowl players on your right side (Mathis/Long). Plus, Slauson is an above-average OG.

 

Of course, this is all assuming Long can effectively play RT, but I have no reason to believe he can't based on his size and measurables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Aug 10, 2015 -> 11:52 AM)
Twitter says undisclosed draft pick. Kind of remarkable there, I wonder what conditions you put on it. 7th rounder if he makes the 53?

 

They traded Groy for OLB Matthew Wells, not a pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Aug 10, 2015 -> 01:35 PM)
That came out after I wrote that.

 

I wasnt intending to call you out, I also had no idea what the trade was for and assumed a pick was coming back. Sorry if it came across that way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you believe his pro day results, he's really effing fast for a OLB. His 4.44 40 would have destroyed Beaselys 4.53, and his 3 cone would have been top 5 as well.

 

His 15 reps would have been last though. 18 was the lowest at the combine.

 

Starter on a really good defense at Miss St.

 

Could be an interesting little project for Fangio...Get em in the weight room.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (scs787 @ Aug 10, 2015 -> 03:08 PM)
If you believe his pro day results, he's really effing fast for a OLB. His 4.44 40 would have destroyed Beaselys 4.53, and his 3 cone would have been top 5 as well.

 

His 15 reps would have been last though. 18 was the lowest at the combine.

 

Starter on a really good defense at Miss St.

 

Could be an interesting little project for Fangio...Get em in the weight room.

 

Seems like they are looking at him as a ST player first and foremost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's crazy all the rumors about Willie Young not making the final 53.

 

Shows how crazy the football business side is. Sign a decent deal, have a great start, get a brutal injury and you are discarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...