YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 01:54 PM) Hard to believe they'd claim him and then expose him to waivers again in a week. If he doesn't make the Opening Day team out of Spring Training, is he exposed to waivers again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 QUOTE (Mike F. @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 01:57 PM) If he doesn't make the Opening Day team out of Spring Training, is he exposed to waivers again? Yes sir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 02:03 PM) Yes sir. That is such a tough spot for Ventura/Cooper to be in. They'll barely have any time to work with Drabek, but they'll have to make a decision on him very quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) Since the two teams haven't played (AZ vs. FLA) in spring training, they've either been watching him for a LONG time (and jumped when he became available) or they've been doing so thorough scouting work this March...or some combination of both. Edited March 29, 2015 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 01:54 PM) Hard to believe they'd claim him and then expose him to waivers again in a week. I also have an additional question. If they have him on the team to start the season but then send him down at some point, is he still exposed to waivers then? Is it like the Nieto case last year where if the Sox would've sent him down, the Nationals could've claimed him back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 QUOTE (Mike F. @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 03:58 PM) I also have an additional question. If they have him on the team to start the season but then send him down at some point, is he still exposed to waivers then? Is it like the Nieto case last year where if the Sox would've sent him down, the Nationals could've claimed him back? Outside of the disabled list, as far as I know yes, the Sox would have to pass him through waivers to be able to send him to AAA. If they want to hold him he needs a 25 man roster spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 03:00 PM) Outside of the disabled list, as far as I know yes, the Sox would have to pass him through waivers to be able to send him to AAA. If they want to hold him he needs a 25 man roster spot. This is only because he's out of options (used in '11, '13 & '14), Nieto's situation was different, he was a rule V draft pick, so if the Sox wanted to send him down they'd have to offer him back to the Nationals first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 03:00 PM) Outside of the disabled list, as far as I know yes, the Sox would have to pass him through waivers to be able to send him to AAA. If they want to hold him he needs a 25 man roster spot. And it really sounds like he is destined for the pen. I wonder if we could see our next Noesi project at some point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 30, 2015 Share Posted March 30, 2015 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 29, 2015 -> 09:04 AM) Charlotte rotation could actually be pretty fun with Rodon, Drabek, Beck, and Johnson. Fun and Erik Johnson used in the same sentence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.