Chicago White Sox Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 BUMP Win and a save in one day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Apr 23, 2015 -> 07:51 AM) Ya I'm thinking he ups his k/9 a bit. 18 isn't that great. He's bumped a bit, right? Still, until he hits 27 k/9, no good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 if i remember correctly, no one said anything negative when the sox signed him, it was all positive. now for those who may have wondered, jump on the boat. this is why the sox needed him. sox in 15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 It is probably impossible for a pitcher to finish with a -.85 FIP and a -.34 xFIP. I've seen the negative FIP a few times before, it can happen, but this is a first on the negative xFIP. What he did today is exceedingly difficult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Apr 26, 2015 -> 04:11 PM) if i remember correctly, no one said anything negative when the sox signed him, it was all positive. now for those who may have wondered, jump on the boat. this is why the sox needed him. sox in 15. I wouldn't say that. Just that it was atypical for the White Sox to sink so much money into a closer (last time was probably Koch)...instead, preferring to find bargains from their minor league system like Howry, Keith Foulke, Bobby Jenks, Sergio Santos, Hector Santiago, Addison Reed, etc. Robertson's being paid as an elite, top 3-5 closer in the game. That's fine, as long as the performance is close to in line with those expectations. It's when pitchers like Santos or Carlos Marmol or Papelbon completely fall off the map or get injured and you have to pay them $36 million or whatever that the problems arise. Clearly, though, the Sox would have preferred for someone like Petricka or Webb to have seized the role (internally) and run with it. When it became obvious that wasn't going to happen, Hahn was put into a corner and had to do something entering 2015. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Apr 26, 2015 -> 05:59 PM) I wouldn't say that. Just that it was atypical for the White Sox to sink so much money into a closer (last time was probably Koch)...instead, preferring to find bargains from their minor league system like Howry, Keith Foulke, Bobby Jenks, Sergio Santos, Hector Santiago, Addison Reed, etc. Robertson's being paid as an elite, top 3-5 closer in the game. That's fine, as long as the performance is close to in line with those expectations. It's when pitchers like Santos or Carlos Marmol or Papelbon completely fall off the map or get injured and you have to pay them $36 million or whatever that the problems arise. Clearly, though, the Sox would have preferred for someone like Petricka or Webb to have seized the role (internally) and run with it. When it became obvious that wasn't going to happen, Hahn was put into a corner and had to do something entering 2015. Well, a month in, I'd say he has exceeded expectations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 QUOTE (Heads22 @ Apr 26, 2015 -> 05:00 PM) Well, a month in, I'd say he has exceeded expectations. Agreed. More importantly, the team's mindset is MUCH more confident when we have a 1-2 run lead...not waiting for the other shoe to drop. Seriously, last year, Beckham's throw wouldn't have been corralled by Abreu and then that ball hit to DeAza/Viciedo becomes a game-tying double and probably the entire game is blown as happened frequently enough last year with Blow-a-savio or Petricka. Instead, the players cinched it up and hunkered down and made the plays that needed to be made to preserve the victory...instead of being the victim of circumstances or "bad breaks." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Pretty hard to have bad breaks when Robertson barely ever lets the ball in play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 He'd been challenging Kerry Wood's K numbers if he was a starter...for a single game's worth of 27 outs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDWhiteSoxFan Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Apr 26, 2015 -> 06:11 PM) if i remember correctly, no one said anything negative when the sox signed him, it was all positive. now for those who may have wondered, jump on the boat. this is why the sox needed him. sox in 15. I remember someone was trashing him... I can't remember who but it was one of my first few weeks on the board. But someone was trashing Robertson like he was Joe Nathan or something. He's been dominate for along time. This is only his 2nd year closing but as a SU for Rivera he was filthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 QUOTE (MDWhiteSoxFan @ Apr 27, 2015 -> 02:36 AM) I remember someone was trashing him... I can't remember who but it was one of my first few weeks on the board. But someone was trashing Robertson like he was Joe Nathan or something. He's been dominate for along time. This is only his 2nd year closing but as a SU for Rivera he was filthy. then i was wrong, but it was only 1 person. still the overwhelming amount was for the signing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.