Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 IF the sox only win 3 of 4 vs. the twins: They have a 2 game lead. WE go to minnesota for 3 and boston for 3. REALISITCALLY, we will win 2, the twins go to cleveland for 4 and have us at home for 3. Lets see ill be totally generous and say they split in cleveland and beat us 2 out of three. That leaves them 1/2 back and thats being generous. Then we are home against the yanks and royals for 6. Again being generous, lets say we win 4 of 6. The twins are home for Detroit and cleveland for 5. Easily they win 4 of of and we are tied for 1st. Last 4 games of the season we play KC and they play DET. OBJECTIVELY you would have to think we would be tied at best. Thats with finishing the homestand 6-1 and being objective if not GENEROUS with how the sox will do and the twins will fair. We need a sweep, people. If you think this thinking is "negative" or "naysayer" or "quitting" you are just an non objective fool. To each their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Could you tell me the numbers for this weeks lottery? I want to win the 55 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 Could you tell me the numbers for this weeks lottery? I want to win the 55 million. Yeah i know its tough seeing someone analyze something. JUST IMAGINE.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 I just wanted you to use that crystal ball to make me rich. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 I just wanted you to use that crystal ball to make me rich. Comparing analyzing to a crystal ball tells me all i need to know about you. Typical. IS there anyone here who can think? Zachy is out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Comparing analyzing to a crystal ball tells me all i need to know about you. Typical. IS there anyone here who can think? Zachy is out. Well, from what it sounds like, you are never wrong about anything. You always know everything that the future holds. It's too bad you are wasting your talent on a message board. I am shocked you don't have a position with a professional baseball team with all your expertise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 Well, from what it sounds like, you are never wrong about anything. You always know everything that the future holds. It's too bad you are wasting your talent on a message board. I am shocked you don't have a position with a professional baseball team with all your expertise. More ignorance, NEXT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 I think your "realistically" is perhaps a bit pessimistic... 3 out of 4 against Twins this series, I would say is pessimistic-realisitic. Garland vs Santana I would say is the only matchup where the Twins actualy have an advantage with starting pitching, and even there Garland has been very good the last month or so. A sweep is really not that far out of the question if the pitching shows up. 2 out of 6 against Twins and Boston, I would say that is pessimistic. Realistically I expect the sox to go 3-3 or 4-2. Against Boston the Sox just barely lost both games, and in the end all things usualy even out, so I see them taking 2 of 3 from Boston, cause Boston really did not look like they could handle the Sox pitching. And now that the Sox are more familiar with the Boston staff they usually do bteter. I would also venture to say the Sox take 2 of 3 from the Twins depending on the starting pitching. Unless the Sox throw, Wright and Garland, we should have favorable pitching in atleast 2 of the games, perhaps even all 3. To think that being at the Metrodome makes that much of a difference is to go against the facts of this year. The twins have not been a monster at home this year, and the White Sox are playing much better defense. As for the rest I would say that you were actually fair as for what you believed. Although I doubt the Twins are going to just run off all these victories against crappy teams, especially since outside of Santana they can get lit up every night. I expect the Tribe to take 1 or 2, and Detroit to take 1-2. In the end we cant look to what the Twins are doing, if we win the games we play, we take first place. And thats all you can ask of your team, is just to go out and win everyday and hope for the best. If the White Sox win, theyll be in the playoffs, if they lose, theyll be watching on tv. Its as simple as that. SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Well, from what it sounds like, you are never wrong about anything. You always know everything that the future holds. It's too bad you are wasting your talent on a message board. I am shocked you don't have a position with a professional baseball team with all your expertise. More ignorance, NEXT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 I think your "realistically" is perhaps a bit pessimistic... 3 out of 4 against Twins this series, I would say is pessimistic-realisitic. Garland vs Santana I would say is the only matchup where the Twins actualy have an advantage with starting pitching, and even there Garland has been very good the last month or so. A sweep is really not that far out of the question if the pitching shows up. 2 out of 6 against Twins and Boston, I would say that is pessimistic. Realistically I expect the sox to go 3-3 or 4-2. Against Boston the Sox just barely lost both games, and in the end all things usualy even out, so I see them taking 2 of 3 from Boston, cause Boston really did not look like they could handle the Sox pitching. And now that the Sox are more familiar with the Boston staff they usually do bteter. I would also venture to say the Sox take 2 of 3 from the Twins depending on the starting pitching. Unless the Sox throw, Wright and Garland, we should have favorable pitching in atleast 2 of the games, perhaps even all 3. To think that being at the Metrodome makes that much of a difference is to go against the facts of this year. The twins have not been a monster at home this year, and the White Sox are playing much better defense. As for the rest I would say that you were actually fair as for what you believed. Although I doubt the Twins are going to just run off all these victories against crappy teams, especially since outside of Santana they can get lit up every night. I expect the Tribe to take 1 or 2, and Detroit to take 1-2. In the end we cant look to what the Twins are doing, if we win the games we play, we take first place. And thats all you can ask of your team, is just to go out and win everyday and hope for the best. If the White Sox win, theyll be in the playoffs, if they lose, theyll be watching on tv. Its as simple as that. SB Ahhhh THINKING. Thank you. I dont have to be right but there has to be more people who can post beyond the usual mindless crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 I just wanted you to use that crystal ball to make me rich. Zach, I can tell you the score of tonight's game before it starts! 0-0 what the score will be after the game start's, that I do not know. say hi to huge and your bro for me -- oh, and 5, 7, 22, 28, 30, and 44 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 IF the sox only win 3 of 4 vs. the twins: They have a 2 game lead. WE go to minnesota for 3 and boston for 3. REALISITCALLY, we will win 2, the twins go to cleveland for 4 and have us at home for 3. Lets see ill be totally generous and say they split in cleveland and beat us 2 out of three. That leaves them 1/2 back and thats being generous. Then we are home against the yanks and royals for 6. Again being generous, lets say we win 4 of 6. The twins are home for Detroit and cleveland for 5. Easily they win 4 of of and we are tied for 1st. Last 4 games of the season we play KC and they play DET. OBJECTIVELY you would have to think we would be tied at best. Thats with finishing the homestand 6-1 and being objective if not GENEROUS with how the sox will do and the twins will fair. We need a sweep, people. If you think this thinking is "negative" or "naysayer" or "quitting" you are just an non objective fool. To each their own. Weren't you the one who said last week that if Buerhle and Colon took care of business the division was the Sox'? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 IF the sox only win 3 of 4 vs. the twins: They have a 2 game lead. WE go to minnesota for 3 and boston for 3. REALISITCALLY, we will win 2, the twins go to cleveland for 4 and have us at home for 3. Lets see ill be totally generous and say they split in cleveland and beat us 2 out of three. That leaves them 1/2 back and thats being generous. Then we are home against the yanks and royals for 6. Again being generous, lets say we win 4 of 6. The twins are home for Detroit and cleveland for 5. Easily they win 4 of of and we are tied for 1st. Last 4 games of the season we play KC and they play DET. OBJECTIVELY you would have to think we would be tied at best. Thats with finishing the homestand 6-1 and being objective if not GENEROUS with how the sox will do and the twins will fair. We need a sweep, people. If you think this thinking is "negative" or "naysayer" or "quitting" you are just an non objective fool. To each their own. Weren't you the one who said last week that if Buerhle and Colon took care of business the division was the Sox'? Yes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Zach, I can tell you the score of tonight's game before it starts! 0-0 what the score will be after the game start's, that I do not know. say hi to huge and your bro for me -- oh, and 5, 7, 22, 28, 30, and 44 Hey you, stop posting that mindless crap. If I play those numbers and win your season tickets are on me. I will buy you a helicopter to get you in from Michigan too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 Zach, I can tell you the score of tonight's game before it starts! 0-0 what the score will be after the game start's, that I do not know. say hi to huge and your bro for me -- oh, and 5, 7, 22, 28, 30, and 44 Hey you, stop posting that mindless crap. If I play those numbers and win your season tickets are on me. I will buy you a helicopter to get you in from Michigan too. Oh you boys stop flirting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach23 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Zach, I can tell you the score of tonight's game before it starts! 0-0 what the score will be after the game start's, that I do not know. say hi to huge and your bro for me -- oh, and 5, 7, 22, 28, 30, and 44 Hey you, stop posting that mindless crap. If I play those numbers and win your season tickets are on me. I will buy you a helicopter to get you in from Michigan too. Oh you boys stop flirting. Don't be jealous. We still love you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 Zach, I can tell you the score of tonight's game before it starts! 0-0 what the score will be after the game start's, that I do not know. say hi to huge and your bro for me -- oh, and 5, 7, 22, 28, 30, and 44 Hey you, stop posting that mindless crap. If I play those numbers and win your season tickets are on me. I will buy you a helicopter to get you in from Michigan too. Oh you boys stop flirting. Don't be jealous. We still love you. LOL, uhhh thanks............i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 bmr, zach won't have my child because he wants to have yours first. you have all the brains and all the cute looks and all the action too. How do you do it? You are so blessed! Should I ever grow up, I want to be just like you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Don't be jealous. We still love you. 3 way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 bmr, zach won't have my child because he wants to have yours first. you have all the brains and all the cute looks and all the action too. How do you do it? You are so blessed! Should I ever grow up, I want to be just like you! You want to be straight? I thought it was hereditary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 You want to be straight? Being straight might be fun! I have already been convex, concave, linear, spatial, triangular, and ellipitcal. I was going for ovid next but if you are what straight is, then that is what I want to be! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 You want to be straight? Being straight might be fun! I have already been convex, concave, linear, spatial, triangular, and ellipitcal. I was going for ovid next but if you are what straight is, then that is what I want to be! Yes, I know. I feel your sorrow, I really do. I wish I could help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zach61 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Just think, if Colon would have won just 1/2 the games he lost, Sox would be in 1st. Just think, if the Twins played as well as they did last year, Twins would be in 1st place. Just think, if the game was played on paper, we would already know who won the division. Just think, if Bummer is wrong, he will still have an excuse why the Twins didn't win instead of giving the Sox some credit for winning it. Just think, if Bummer ever made it to a tailgate, he would know what we were eating before we did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted September 8, 2003 Author Share Posted September 8, 2003 Just think, if Colon would have won just 1/2 the games he lost, Sox would be in 1st. Just think, if the Twins played as well as they did last year, Twins would be in 1st place. Just think, if the game was played on paper, we would already know who won the division. Just think, if Bummer is wrong, he will still have an excuse why the Twins didn't win instead of giving the Sox some credit for winning it. Just think, if Bummer ever made it to a tailgate, he would know what we were eating before we did. LOL and to think i was worried about the quality of posts here........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Yes, I know. I feel your sorrow, I really do. I wish I could help. thanks! you are such a dude! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.