LittleHurt05 Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 10:51 PM) This game is a physical bloodbath. "No human can withstand that many hits" - Kesler, Ryan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Seriously, a series of more than 5 is going to wreck the winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) St. Louis can continue to play their bulls*** style of hockey for all I care. The Hawks have lots of chances. Edited April 14, 2016 by RockRaines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 This Blues brand of hockey is so weird. Not a fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) The Blackhawks defense is terrible. Johns would have been great right about there. Edited April 14, 2016 by AustinIllini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Lol so lucky. Dominated that game. s***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:32 PM) The Blackhawks defense is terrible Lol. Missing their top guy and they gave up 17 shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:34 PM) Lol. Missing their top guy and they gave up 17 shots. And for nothing. TVR was asleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:35 PM) And for nothing. TVR was asleep. 17 shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (Tony @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:35 PM) Awful troll job there. Step your game up. What the HECK was that? Seriously. That's infuriating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 They lost because of the power play. Need to capitalize. Get the next one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:36 PM) 17 shots. 4 shots in the final 30 minutes yet they score the only goal. f***ing Playoff hockey can be a b**** sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:38 PM) 4 shots in the final 30 minutes yet they score the only goal. f***ing Playoff hockey can be a b**** sometimes. Scored a goal on a pass. I like the way we played. Get Keith back and get the next one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 They have now scored 1 goal in their last ~133 minutes against the Blues. Blame TVR all you want, but you cannot win a hockey game with 0 goals. That is proven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) At least that Hawks defense can score QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:42 PM) What does Stephen Johns have to do with it? He would be a solid 4th dman the Hawks desperately need. Edited April 14, 2016 by AustinIllini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:42 PM) At least that Hawks defense can score He would be a solid 4th dman the Hawks desperately need. They gave up 1 goal in 70 minutes. That could have happened to TVR, Johns, Keith, Lidstrom. That's a fluke goal. Unless you can tell me Johns would have scored a goal in regulation, I don't really give a damn about a guy who played 14 games for a team that also has some struggles defensively Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 We didn't win, but honestly, I feel fine about it overall. Team played pretty well I thought, just didn't get the breaks or lucky bounces. I'm not worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Mashinter had no business playing in this game. Keith (who will be in) and Panik (who SHOULD be in) better be drawing Svedberg and Mashinter next game. Hell, I'd put in Weise for Desjardins as well. Weise is a much better playoff performer and Hawks need the offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2016 -> 07:00 AM) Mashinter had no business playing in this game. Keith (who will be in) and Panik (who SHOULD be in) better be drawing Svedberg and Mashinter next game. Hell, I'd put in Weise for Desjardins as well. Weise is a much better playoff performer and Hawks need the offense. totally agree. this is not the time to be experimenting . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Desi played pretty good I thought actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruth05 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 14, 2016 -> 06:44 AM) Desi played pretty good I thought actually. Desi definitely played good. Mashinter was just about as bad as expected. Hawks had alot of good looks just couldn't capitalize, get #2 back tomorrow and even the series up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2016 -> 02:00 AM) Mashinter had no business playing in this game. Keith (who will be in) and Panik (who SHOULD be in) better be drawing Svedberg and Mashinter next game. Hell, I'd put in Weise for Desjardins as well. Weise is a much better playoff performer and Hawks need the offense. No way. Do not break up the Desjardins-Kruger-Shaw line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Apr 13, 2016 -> 11:42 PM) you cannot win a hockey game with 0 goals I double-checked your math and agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 QUOTE (SoxAce @ Apr 14, 2016 -> 02:00 AM) Weise is a much better playoff performer and Hawks need the offense. Seems like a strong move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 If the Hawks keep playing like they did last night they win this series, doubling up the shots of your opponent is a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts