RockRaines Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 QUOTE (gatnom @ Sep 2, 2015 -> 11:21 AM) Ha, it seemed like a completely normal thing to say until you pointed it out. The interview seems incredibly badly translated, almost like translating a japanese newspaper to english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Fwiw Raanta told Mark Lazerus that he didn't say that at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Are we ever going to re-sign Kruger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 QUOTE (Whitewashed in '05 @ Sep 2, 2015 -> 08:09 PM) Are we ever going to re-sign Kruger? I sure hope so. He said he's willing to take a pay cut to stay here... unlike some people *cough* Saad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Just speculating, what kind of return can you expect for Kane acct for current circumstances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Kevin Matthews 1 hr · Twitter · Source: Hawks haven't asked Patrick Kane about waiving no-move clause - via @ESPN App Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 3, 2015 -> 10:39 AM) Kevin Matthews 1 hr · Twitter · Source: Hawks haven't asked Patrick Kane about waiving no-move clause - via @ESPN App He get this from Jim Shorts or Chet Chit Chat......I assume a different Kevin Matthews... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 Toews did an interview today. He speaks about Kane around the 8:15 mark. (the only Hawk, player or personnel, who has commented on it) http://www.tsn.ca/radio/winnipeg-1290/toew...ammate-1.355312 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (Knuckles @ Sep 3, 2015 -> 01:45 AM) Just speculating, what kind of return can you expect for Kane acct for current circumstances? imho, it will not be full value. many will try to take advantage of the hawks salary crunch at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 3, 2015 -> 03:39 PM) Kevin Matthews 1 hr · Twitter · Source: Hawks haven't asked Patrick Kane about waiving no-move clause - via @ESPN App thanks for this update, i suspect that the hawks will ride this out with Kane this yr, but he might be trade bait later. Edited September 4, 2015 by LDF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 Comcast SportsNet @CSNChicago 7m7 minutes ago Report: Friend of alleged victim subpoenaed in investigation of #Blackhawks Patrick Kane -- http://bit.ly/1LZSbVa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 09:24 AM) Comcast SportsNet @CSNChicago 7m7 minutes ago Report: Friend of alleged victim subpoenaed in investigation of #Blackhawks Patrick Kane -- http://bit.ly/1LZSbVa What does this exactly mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 05:12 PM) What does this exactly mean? just getting back ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 11:12 AM) What does this exactly mean? The friend of the victim is going to be interviewed before they decide to press charges or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 01:35 PM) The friend of the victim is going to be interviewed before they decide to press charges or not Would it be normal to have to issue a subpoena/compel testimony from a witness in a case like this? Generally that seems weird to me, I'd figure they'd just normally ask a witness to speak to the investigators, but I'm not certain how things go in this type of case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 12:36 PM) Would it be normal to have to issue a subpoena/compel testimony from a witness in a case like this? Generally that seems weird to me, I'd figure they'd just normally ask a witness to speak to the investigators, but I'm not certain how things go in this type of case. I have no idea what is normal in these cases, but it seems like everything about the investigation has been abnormal from the get go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 2, 2015 -> 09:27 AM) http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-dad...-140247584.html Yes, they had such terrible chemistry that they won the Stanley Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 Dammit, Kaner. Why you gotta be so sloppy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 12:36 PM) Would it be normal to have to issue a subpoena/compel testimony from a witness in a case like this? Generally that seems weird to me, I'd figure they'd just normally ask a witness to speak to the investigators, but I'm not certain how things go in this type of case. IIRC Doughty's and Winston's cases never even got to a grand jury. This to me means that there is enough evidence against Kane to charge, but this friend hasn't been cooperating. This is a way to get her to cooperate and be a witness against Kane. If it works this could be Kane's nail in the coffin in terms of actually charging him for the rape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 05:22 PM) IIRC Doughty's and Winston's cases never even got to a grand jury. This to me means that there is enough evidence against Kane to charge, but this friend hasn't been cooperating. This is a way to get her to cooperate and be a witness against Kane. If it works this could be Kane's nail in the coffin in terms of actually charging him for the rape. Why would the friend not cooperate with her friend in supporting her story of what happened that night? That's not much of a friend if their testimony has to be compelled, at least to me. If someone had hurt a friend of mine and I was asked by police to testify to what I'd seen I don't think I'd need to be subpoenaed to tell them what I'd seen. If it were standard procedure fine, give me the document and I'll tell you that anyway. OTOH, if I see one of my friends do something and then lie about it later, such that my testimony disagrees with my friend's claim, that would seem to me to be a case where it is much more likely that my testimony under oath would need to be compelled with a subpoena. Again, I don't know that, it could be standard procedure in these cases to compel testimony for whatever reason, but the latter makes more sense to me than the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 4, 2015 Author Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 09:24 AM) Comcast SportsNet @CSNChicago 7m7 minutes ago Report: Friend of alleged victim subpoenaed in investigation of #Blackhawks Patrick Kane -- http://bit.ly/1LZSbVa At this point, he's not gonna be at training camp in two weeks and he's most likely doubtful for the banner raising October 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 11:03 PM) At this point, he's not gonna be at training camp in two weeks and he's most likely doubtful for the banner raising October 7. i agree. wouldn't he not be allowed to leave the state until the whole investigation is over???? esp if it mean leaving the usa borders, regulation and restriction are still in play here. Edited September 4, 2015 by LDF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted September 4, 2015 Author Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 06:12 PM) i agree. wouldn't he not be allowed to leave the state until the whole investigation is over???? esp if it mean leaving the usa borders, regulation and restriction are still in play here. That doesn't even matter. The Blackhawks and/or the NHL will not let him play while a grand jury investigation is going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted September 4, 2015 Share Posted September 4, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 11:16 PM) That doesn't even matter. The Blackhawks and/or the NHL will not let him play while a grand jury investigation is going on. now i am not saying this is wrong, but you are prob right. but i am talking about the law and nothing is going to over ride the law. the nhl would be secondary to the law of the land. but you are correct. this is going to be a huge pr and media productions. they, the nhl official are going to be under the magnifying glass on every step they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted September 5, 2015 Share Posted September 5, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 4, 2015 -> 04:33 PM) Why would the friend not cooperate with her friend in supporting her story of what happened that night? That's not much of a friend if their testimony has to be compelled, at least to me. If someone had hurt a friend of mine and I was asked by police to testify to what I'd seen I don't think I'd need to be subpoenaed to tell them what I'd seen. If it were standard procedure fine, give me the document and I'll tell you that anyway. OTOH, if I see one of my friends do something and then lie about it later, such that my testimony disagrees with my friend's claim, that would seem to me to be a case where it is much more likely that my testimony under oath would need to be compelled with a subpoena. Again, I don't know that, it could be standard procedure in these cases to compel testimony for whatever reason, but the latter makes more sense to me than the former. Maybe she either doesn't want to be the one to put Kane behind bars or maybe she feels like her friend is lying but doesn't want to be the one to end the case for her friend. Regardless if she had to be subpoenaed it means she didn't want to give out much information to the police initially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts