Jump to content

2015-16 NHL thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 06:10 PM)
Scott Levin ‏@ScottLevinWGRZ 6m6 minutes ago

Lawyers for #PatrickKane accuser are holding another press conference at 8;45 tonight regarding the alleged evidence bag. @WGRZ

 

Here we go again.

This is just a circus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 07:10 PM)
Scott Levin ‏@ScottLevinWGRZ 6m6 minutes ago

Lawyers for #PatrickKane accuser are holding another press conference at 8;45 tonight regarding the alleged evidence bag. @WGRZ

 

Here we go again.

What else is there to say? What a circus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stacy St. Clair Verified account ‏@StacyStClair 1m1 minute ago

 

Accuser's attorney says he "no longer has confidence" in the version of events that were given to him. Quits Kane case for "ethical reasons"

 

Brian Mazurowski ‏@BMaz1 4m4 minutes ago

 

Eoannou says he will no longer represent Kane's accuser after what was referred to as an evidence bag was "misrepresented"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LDF @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 12:45 AM)
quite wise grass hopper.

 

but joking aside, i just read 6 pages of what i missed.

 

the biggest thing i can think of, he now brings the momentum back on the victim side.

 

the next thing is to let the officials do their work to see if it is the bag or not.

 

on a side note, if it is the part of the same pkg ...... now comes the realm of the possibilities. in other word, some can call into question the actual dna testing or the integrity of the final results.

 

here is a question. what would you do if you were the hawks FO and the official statement is that it part of the official pkg????

 

do you still stand by your player???

 

or do you ask the league to step in and suspend Kane per CBA Article 18-A.5 ?????

 

the integrity is and will be proven just by the lawyer quiting.

 

this really put this in a whole new light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 09:05 PM)
I agree.

 

Couldn't she face charges for fabricating a story in an ongoing investigation?

I think there's a difference between making public statements and making statements to the police that could matter here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 08:05 PM)
I agree.

 

Couldn't she face charges for fabricating a story in an ongoing investigation?

No. There's so much loaded into a criminal countersuit. They would have to prove the woman didn't think she was assaulted and was knowingly fabricating a story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 08:27 PM)
No. There's so much loaded into a criminal countersuit. They would have to prove the woman didn't think she was assaulted and was knowingly fabricating a story.

In your reply they are referring to the mother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Sep 24, 2015 -> 08:06 PM)
And that horrible woman needs to be locked up.

 

And EA Sports should print new covers.

This doesn't mean Kane is innocent. I think we're assuming because her lawyer is quitting that Kane is innocent. He could still have done this. It is, however, looking more and more like he's going to have the accusations dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...