GGajewski18 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (whtsoxfan @ Oct 26, 2015 -> 07:47 PM) Can't believe Getzlaf/Perry have combined 0 goals...wow, explains their 1-5-1 record They have 6 goals. No player on the Ducks has 3 points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This looks like a Rat Hockey game. Bunch of dudes just slapping at the puck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 It's a bunch of guys who haven't played together and Anaheim has morphed into this chippy trapping team against us. Just horrific hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 180 regulation minutes without Duncan Keith. Only two goals allowed, but only three goals scored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Crawford has been fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 This Toews guy has had a solid career Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewashed in '05 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Oct 26, 2015 -> 10:29 PM) This Toews guy has had a solid career Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 26, 2015 -> 10:12 PM) 180 regulation minutes without Duncan Keith. Only two goals allowed, but only three goals scored. I would imagine they have had a very conservative game plan to make sure not leave the defense high and dry down Keith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 03:19 AM) Crawford has been fantastic. yeah, at first i was kinda of so-so when he got his contract. i have always known any success a team has, needs a #1 elite goalie. well, Craw has proven that and is earning his salary. the hawk org will be dumb if they trade Craw in the next 4 yrs. no matter how good the team is around him, the team really needs that #1 elite goalie. Edited October 27, 2015 by LDF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (Chilihead90 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 06:52 AM) I would imagine they have had a very conservative game plan to make sure not leave the defense high and dry down Keith. i agree, and not only b/c Keith is down, but with all the new faces on the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 03:29 AM) This Toews guy has had a solid career 2 OT winners, 2 of them, and with in the first minute of play. how many players would have love to have that stat?? this first line of 3 players for ot is powerful. Kane, Toews and Seab. wait until Kane starts getting into the action. you know, i wonder who is on that second line of OT?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 02:49 AM) I am totally wrong to think Svedberg is playing at least at a serviceable level? Aside from being a giant, he hasn't been very noticeable, which is exactly what you want out of a rookie D man. interesting concept...... i like it. i see his minutes climbing and i also see his hits climbing as well. i will be honest, i was extremely concerned when keith went down. but this will be as the cliche' goes, baptism under fire and he is doing good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 01:44 AM) It's a bunch of guys who haven't played together and Anaheim has morphed into this chippy trapping team against us. Just horrific hockey. the hawks will see alot of that. many team who don't have that talent level on the team, from line 1 thru line 4, will need to contain the hawks, hence trapping. i rather have the hawk see it now, and learn how to beat it or get around it, so when playoff time comes around, they will be experience with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Crawford was incredible last night. And f*** the refs for screwing us out of another goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 07:59 AM) Crawford was incredible last night. And f*** the refs for screwing us out of another goal That situation sucked but I'm not real sure how you figure the refs are to blame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 09:34 AM) That situation sucked but I'm not real sure how you figure the refs are to blame. Was that called penalty? I did not see the game but saw the highlight. That has always been something I never understood. That is an easy way to bail yourself out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Brian Hedger @BrianHedger 21m21 minutes ago #Blackhawks reassign Hinostroza to Rockford. Plenty of LTIR relief, even if Rozsival returns Oct. 30, so they could recall a couple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 11:15 AM) Was that called penalty? I did not see the game but saw the highlight. That has always been something I never understood. That is an easy way to bail yourself out. Jon Quick does that a lot. It's not a penalty if it's ruled "accidental" according to the official rule. I imagine it would be hard for an official to judge it purposeful during a full speed play, and that can't be reviewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 05:18 PM) Jon Quick does that a lot. It's not a penalty if it's ruled "accidental" according to the official rule. I imagine it would be hard for an official to judge it purposeful during a full speed play, and that can't be reviewed. i know, the can't be reviewed would be the answer, well maybe in most cases. i remember, before it was a penalty and a penalty shot. then in the 80's it was a goal if the net wasn't pulled off before it crossed the line. for me, and again, i am watching it on review, it was a crap call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 It's basically just a coward's way out when you know you're about to get scored on, and it's annoying. It happened a few years ago, game 6 against Vancouver in the playoffs. We ended up winning in OT thanks to Ben Smith (IIRC), but earlier we scored a goal that was waved off because Luongo or Schneider purposely moved the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 11:18 AM) Brian Hedger @BrianHedger 21m21 minutes ago #Blackhawks reassign Hinostroza to Rockford. Plenty of LTIR relief, even if Rozsival returns Oct. 30, so they could recall a couple. Dano? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 12:03 PM) It's basically just a coward's way out when you know you're about to get scored on, and it's annoying. It happened a few years ago, game 6 against Vancouver in the playoffs. We ended up winning in OT thanks to Ben Smith (IIRC), but earlier we scored a goal that was waved off because Luongo or Schneider purposely moved the net. Quick uses it as a technique, he practices it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 11:58 AM) i know, the can't be reviewed would be the answer, well maybe in most cases. i remember, before it was a penalty and a penalty shot. then in the 80's it was a goal if the net wasn't pulled off before it crossed the line. for me, and again, i am watching it on review, it was a crap call. Why would it ever not be a goal if it crossed before the net was pulled off. What are you even trying to say there. It wasn't a crap call. It was absolutely the correct call. There was no clear intent and the goal was moved well before the shot went in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 So overtime is must watch TV now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 06:46 PM) So overtime is must watch TV now. yeah if i can stay up, i would definitely be getting it. i know some players are struggling but the hawks are finding ways to win. i am starting to get a good feeling about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts