Condor13 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Shark and Duke for Puig or Shark and Q for Puig. Yeah its insane but would be great for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Dodger fan on Twitter: "Sources telling me Urias for Sale straight up is close" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 24, 2015 Author Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 10:32 AM) Dodger fan on Twitter: "Sources telling me Urias for Sale straight up is close" Bahaha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 And a Sox fan said "As much as I love Sale, I'd trade him and Alexei for Puig and Seager in a heartbeat." Dumbass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Condor13 @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 11:35 AM) Shark and Duke for Puig or Shark and Q for Puig. Yeah its insane but would be great for us. Those are almost similar packages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 12:32 PM) Dodger fan on Twitter: "Sources telling me Urias for Sale straight up is as close to being reality as my imaginary friend." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 (edited) Was this actually some kind of rumor? Edit: Ahh...I see what you did now. Edited July 24, 2015 by iamshack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 12:32 PM) Dodger fan on Twitter: "Sources telling me Urias for Sale straight up is close" That Dodger fan must have been hanging out with some Red Sox fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 I'd be all over a Puig/Pederson, Urias, Seager and another top prospect for Sale move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 24, 2015 Author Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 10:46 AM) I'd be all over a Puig/Pederson, Urias, Seager and another top prospect for Sale move. I still say, if I were able to get those 3 (given Puig's / Pederson's current production), I'd make the move. I'd clearly ask for Barnes but I'd do it for those 3. I wouldn't be happy I was in that position but I think the talent would be worth it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 01:52 PM) I still say, if I were able to get those 3 (given Puig's / Pederson's current production), I'd make the move. I'd clearly ask for Barnes but I'd do it for those 3. I wouldn't be happy I was in that position but I think the talent would be worth it. Last year, I wouldn't have done that deal (or any deal of Sale for comparable talent). This year I would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 24, 2015 Author Share Posted July 24, 2015 What about Sale & Shark to the Dodgers. We know the Dodgers are looking for 2 pitchers and they want at least one of them to be cost-controlled. We have talked Q & Shark, but what about Sale & Shark. Could you get Puig / Urias / Seager / Joc? I highly doubt it as the Dodgers would be pulling 2 guys from their actual lineup (and not sure how they would fill those offensive holes). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrlesque Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 01:17 PM) What about Sale & Shark to the Dodgers. We know the Dodgers are looking for 2 pitchers and they want at least one of them to be cost-controlled. We have talked Q & Shark, but what about Sale & Shark. Could you get Puig / Urias / Seager / Joc? I highly doubt it as the Dodgers would be pulling 2 guys from their actual lineup (and not sure how they would fill those offensive holes). If...if the Dodgers are at all willing to part with all four of those guys in one deal, I am listening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 11:17 AM) What about Sale & Shark to the Dodgers. We know the Dodgers are looking for 2 pitchers and they want at least one of them to be cost-controlled. We have talked Q & Shark, but what about Sale & Shark. Could you get Puig / Urias / Seager / Joc? I highly doubt it as the Dodgers would be pulling 2 guys from their actual lineup (and not sure how they would fill those offensive holes). Do they really need fielders with that pitching staff? Grienke, Sale, Shark, Kershaw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 03:07 PM) Do they really need fielders with that pitching staff? Grienke, Sale, Shark, Kershaw. How has it worked for the White Sox this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 02:14 PM) How has it worked for the White Sox this year? Seriously, I don't want to minimize how important pitching is, but if you replaced Danks with Kershaw this year, I still don't think we are a playoff team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShandyMan Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 (edited) Sale's contract is peanuts to Dodgers. They have the money to resign Greinke when he's up. Having a 123 of Kershaw/Sale/Greinke would be just downright stupid. As long as you make it to the playoffs you're golden. Edited July 24, 2015 by staxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 01:17 PM) What about Sale & Shark to the Dodgers. We know the Dodgers are looking for 2 pitchers and they want at least one of them to be cost-controlled. We have talked Q & Shark, but what about Sale & Shark. Could you get Puig / Urias / Seager / Joc? I highly doubt it as the Dodgers would be pulling 2 guys from their actual lineup (and not sure how they would fill those offensive holes). Puig / Urias / Seager / Joc gets you Sale, entirely because of his stupid trade value. Throw in Samardzija, have to add someone like Barnes. If you're the Sox you could throw Avi or Melky (with cash) to help solidify their outfield. That starting four in the playoffs basically shuts down anyone in their way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 I'm pretty surprised how much the tide has turned in regards to an openness by Soxtalk posters to moving Sale....seems like this was almost unfathomable to most last year at this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 04:51 PM) I'm pretty surprised how much the tide has turned in regards to an openness by Soxtalk posters to moving Sale....seems like this was almost unfathomable to most last year at this time. I will probably say I led the charge against that opinion last year and now I'm much more open. That's how much of a setback I view the 2015 offseason to be. Last year I thought there was near certainty we could field a competitive team by the start of 2016 with lots of payroll flexibility as well. Now I'm skeptical about 2017, and that forces me to consider alternate options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 02:00 PM) I will probably say I led the charge against that opinion last year and now I'm much more open. That's how much of a setback I view the 2015 offseason to be. Last year I thought there was near certainty we could field a competitive team by the start of 2016 with lots of payroll flexibility as well. Now I'm skeptical about 2017, and that forces me to consider alternate options. But that's really the thing...what has the year really done to change anything? What key contributors have really failed this year in regards to the grand scheme of things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrlesque Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 03:51 PM) I'm pretty surprised how much the tide has turned in regards to an openness by Soxtalk posters to moving Sale....seems like this was almost unfathomable to most last year at this time. It's all fantasy/message board fan talk anyway, as I don't think KW/RH would ever actually trade Sale, and the Dodgers would never give up that incredibly risky monster prospect package either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 03:51 PM) I'm pretty surprised how much the tide has turned in regards to an openness by Soxtalk posters to moving Sale....seems like this was almost unfathomable to most last year at this time. Most people are against trading him for what they'd actually get for him. I don't think many would be opposed to trading him for Puig, Seager, Joc, and Urias. That'd be a ridiculous package. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 03:51 PM) I'm pretty surprised how much the tide has turned in regards to an openness by Soxtalk posters to moving Sale....seems like this was almost unfathomable to most last year at this time. To be honest, I know I'm underappreciating him because this team is so bad. I have less joy watching him constantly be forced to pitch a shut out or lose (though it perhaps has made him a better pitcher). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jul 24, 2015 -> 10:08 PM) Most people are against trading him for what they'd actually get for him. I don't think many would be opposed to trading him for Puig, Seager, Joc, and Urias. That'd be a ridiculous package. And one that would never happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.