Kyyle23 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 10:32 PM) And you like the front office? Heck of a trade today huh? Had they made the Gasol deal, at least they would have made SAC better, therefore making it more likely they get Kings' first round pick. Yes I loved it. That's exactly what I said. Please go back and read all of my posts that said that. Everyone's posts said that. We all loved it. It was great. Fab job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 10:32 PM) And you like the front office? Heck of a trade today huh? Had they made the Gasol deal, at least they would have made SAC better, therefore making it more likely they get Kings' first round pick. Honestly Ozz, I agree with you. I don't know if more people here simply are not concentrated on the Bulls and it's just a novelty like "Oh, the Bulls are good, let's check out a game. Ah, the Bulls are bad. Well who cares. BEARS!!" around here. Anyone who's paid attention knows GarPax needs to be fired. Even the local media has turned on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzfest Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 10:38 PM) Honestly Ozz, I agree with you. I don't know if more people here simply are not concentrated on the Bulls and it's just a novelty like "Oh, the Bulls are good, let's check out a game. Ah, the Bulls are bad. Well who cares. BEARS!!" around here. Anyone who's paid attention knows GarPax needs to be fired. Even the local media has turned on them. Thanks nitetrain you the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 10:32 PM) And you like the front office? Heck of a trade today huh? Had they made the Gasol deal, at least they would have made SAC better, therefore making it more likely they get Kings' first round pick. You're a broken record. I'm not a big fan of the front office but you are incredibly obnoxious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogua Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 04:57 PM) Do you realize how atrocious Stephenson has been the last year and a half? And the pick, from what I'm reading, is lottery protected in 2019. In other words, they gave up absolutely nothing and got a nice upgrade at their weakest position. Jordan Griffin Green Redick Paul That might be the best starting 5 in the game. This is absolutely not hyperbole. I'm pretty sure the Clippers starting 5 had the best point differential in all of basketball last year and they improved that. Their issue was depth. The trade also gives them an interesting lineup of Griffin-Pierce - Green-Redick-Paul lineup against the lineup of death late in games if they want. Edited February 19, 2016 by Boogua Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 09:54 PM) I'm wondering if you still stand by the below exchange? QUOTE (ozzfest @ Jan 20, 2016 -> 11:39 AM) * Front office rankings in Chicago (in terms of which teams have the best chance to win it all). Which is how a front office should be judged. 1) Blackhawks 2) Cubs 3) Bears 4) White Sox 5) Bulls Quinarvy : "Lol. Bears should be fifth and Bulls second." Blackhawks/Cubs 1, 1A 3) Bears 4) Bulls 5) White Sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 07:07 AM) Blackhawks/Cubs 1, 1A 3) Bears 4) Bulls 5) White Sox Bears are no where close to winning a title. I'd still take the Bulls 3rd, White Sox 4th then the Bears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 On the positive side, Rose played extremely well last night. Lots of energy, good passing. Unfortunately out of the 14 potential assists he had, the Bulls should something like 2-12 or 2-14 on them. This is going to be a good opportunity for Rose and the Bulls to be forced into running more of Hoiberg's system (for better or worse) while Jimmy is out. It will also be interesting to see when Niko comes back. Reality is, MJD is still rounding into form so that will take some time, but this team as currently constructed is a 7 or 8 seed and nothing better (with Noah / Niko / Jimmy out). And that is a struggle at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pettie4sox Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Bull did nothing at the deadline. Gar is finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 QUOTE (pettie4sox @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 04:43 PM) Bull did nothing at the deadline. Gar is finished. Gar wants to bring Pau and Joakim back. He really loves this roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 Is there any truth to Cowley's claim that GarPax told the players last year it was OK to tune out Thins because he wasn't long for the job? If there is, and I know, it's Cowley, there is no reason they should have a job in the NBA. It is so outrageous, I can't believe it could be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 If the Bulls suck tonight, there are gonna be major boo birds at the UC tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 05:33 PM) Is there any truth to Cowley's claim that GarPax told the players last year it was OK to tune out Thins because he wasn't long for the job? If there is, and I know, it's Cowley, there is no reason they should have a job in the NBA. It is so outrageous, I can't believe it could be true. At first I thought it was only Cowley, but multiple different writers have echoed what he said in their Score call-ins. Aschburner said it just the other day And if he did really do that, he should be fired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 06:15 PM) At first I thought it was only Cowley, but multiple different writers have echoed what he said in their Score call-ins. Aschburner said it just the other day And if he did really do that, he should be fired Forman or Paxson? I doubt both of them said to ignore Thibs. GarPax isn't a person. Edit: Sorry, I didn't mean to say that to you. The previous post doesn't specify Forman or Paxson. Edited February 20, 2016 by AustinIllini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 06:23 PM) P Forman or Paxson? I doubt both of them said to ignore Thibs. GarPax isn't a person. Edit: Sorry, I didn't mean to say that to you. The previous post doesn't specify Forman or Paxson. GarPax means both. According to Cowley they both were doing it, Here is the story. Said it started in training camp which makes it more unbelievable to me. http://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/7/71/13...ent-one-apology Edited February 20, 2016 by Dick Allen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 06:23 PM) Forman or Paxson? I doubt both of them said to ignore Thibs. GarPax isn't a person. Edit: Sorry, I didn't mean to say that to you. The previous post doesn't specify Forman or Paxson. Cowley indicated it was Gar. It's weird hearing them all talk, the seperation of GarPax as a unit has begun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 06:31 PM) GarPax means both. According to Cowley they both were doing it, Here is the story. Said it started in training camp which makes it more unbelievable to me. http://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/7/71/13...ent-one-apology If it were true and even if it was only Gar only saying this, what would it say about Paxson if Joe Cowley knew this was going on and he did not, and what would it say about Paxson that he still employed Gar? I would love if they both were out the door, but I will give them the benefit of doubt on this one. Sabotaging a coach and a season like that seems pretty unlikely to me. Edited February 20, 2016 by Dick Allen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 06:31 PM) GarPax means both. According to Cowley they both were doing it, Here is the story. Said it started in training camp which makes it more unbelievable to me. http://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/7/71/13...ent-one-apology I really wonder if it was both. JR and Paxson weren't picking sides until JVG ripped the Bulls on national television. Basically echos KW-Ozzie perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thxfrthmmrs Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (ozzfest @ Feb 18, 2016 -> 09:54 PM) I'm wondering if you still stand by the below exchange? QUOTE (ozzfest @ Jan 20, 2016 -> 11:39 AM) * Front office rankings in Chicago (in terms of which teams have the best chance to win it all). Which is how a front office should be judged. 1) Blackhawks 2) Cubs 3) Bears 4) White Sox 5) Bulls Quinarvy : "Lol. Bears should be fifth and Bulls second." You'd been banned a long time ago in plenty other forums. Stop taking your frustration of the FO on other posters. If your intention is to get other's approval of your opinion (which seems to be the case), do yourself a favor and just stop. If you want to have Garpax fired, maybe start a petition or write JR a fan mail. Constant negative posts on the internet isn't going to accomplish anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 Felicio bringing a little energy. He did dominate the D League in his brief stint. Glad he's getting a shot. That said already down 11 after 1 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (2005thxfrthmmrs @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 07:15 PM) You'd been banned a long time ago in plenty other forums. Stop taking your frustration of the FO on other posters. If your intention is to get other's approval of your opinion (which seems to be the case), do yourself a favor and just stop. If you want to have Garpax fired, maybe start a petition or write JR a fan mail. Constant negative posts on the internet isn't going to accomplish anything. This. I detest the Bulls FO. They're boring, outdated, limp dick in a viagra era, etc. But ozzfest is just annoying now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 You guys want a hot soxtalk.com exclusive story? Here you go: Kevin Durant pays child support in Chicago. No idea of the nature of the relationship, if it's just a money thing or what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted February 20, 2016 Author Share Posted February 20, 2016 McDermott with 30, Bulls beat Toronto for the 8th straight time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 04:31 PM) GarPax means both. According to Cowley they both were doing it, Here is the story. Said it started in training camp which makes it more unbelievable to me. http://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/7/71/13...ent-one-apology It tells me that for those that believe the Bulls started tuning out Thibs, I'd argue that the front office essentially created an atmosphere for them to tune him out. I don't think it happens without Gar (and potentially Pax) creating a culture where it would be okay (or even appropriate) for the players to disrepect the coach. I'm going to guess there is smoke to this. I'd hope Paxson wasn't part of it, but really there is no defense even if he wasn't a part of it. If you are going to take that sort of stance in the preseason, you should have just got rid of the coach prior (which would have been a mistake and has clearly been proven to be a mistake). I honestly don't understand how JR is continuing to allow this mess. Thibs has to be sitting back and just loving this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Feb 19, 2016 -> 04:56 PM) If it were true and even if it was only Gar only saying this, what would it say about Paxson if Joe Cowley knew this was going on and he did not, and what would it say about Paxson that he still employed Gar? I would love if they both were out the door, but I will give them the benefit of doubt on this one. Sabotaging a coach and a season like that seems pretty unlikely to me. Agree, I don't see how Paxson could allow for something like that to stand. Pax turning a blind eye is just as bad as Pax being a part of it. Unless of course Pax said that is BS and stood up and that isn't being reported. Who knows, all I know is, I'm 100% certain Gar needs to go, and my rope on Pax is extremely short, if not to the point if this is legit, he should too be gone (and I've been long an advocate to keep him and allow him to bring in his own guy). Marks would have been a great hire to come in and replace Gar (with Pax staying in his current role). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts