Rowand44 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Unreal performances by Kyrie and LBJ tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 LeBron and Kyrie might have won the game for the Cavs, but I'm pretty sure this would be a lot closer had Harrison Barnes not missed just about every open 3 he's had in this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxsoxsoxsox Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 41 Lebron 41 Kyrie 2 LOVE lel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Jun 13, 2016 -> 08:20 PM) K.C Johnson said the Bulls would for sure ask for Wiggins which is fair. Way too greedy Gar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Holy cow. They couldn't put them away at home. LeBron always has a chance. If Cleveland takes care of business at home, we have a game seven. This could be just like the OKC series in reverse. Golden State blowing a 3-1 lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I'm not the biggest Jimmy Butler fan and would be on board with dealing him. Minnesota can't get it done without Wiggins though. Not in this draft. #5, Lavine, and Dieng doesn't get it done. Butler is too good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I want to comment on this Wolves rumor but I feel like all I do is talk down about the Bulls and Jimmy so I'm going to leave this one alone ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 They'll never trade Wiggins. Too risky that he's the next big thing. Trade will never get done cause Bulls will demand Wiggins be included IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jun 13, 2016 -> 09:26 PM) Not really. I just want to watch basketball and this continues to not feel like basketball. I don't find it fun watching a known outcome and a bunch of threes. So you prefer that the league not utilize the most efficient shot in basketball outside of dunks/layups because it's not what you grew up with? The game has never been more aesthetically pleasing/entertaining than it is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 13, 2016 -> 11:34 PM) I'm not the biggest Jimmy Butler fan and would be on board with dealing him. Minnesota can't get it done without Wiggins though. Not in this draft. #5, Lavine, and Dieng doesn't get it done. Butler is too good. I will gladly take Zach LaVine. But I will say I don't think Dieng is enough of a third piece to get it done. Edited June 14, 2016 by SoxAce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 12:16 AM) So you prefer that the league not utilize the most efficient shot in basketball outside of dunks/layups because it's not what you grew up with? The game has never been more aesthetically pleasing/entertaining than it is now. I never said I was being rational. I am tired of watching the Warriors hot 20 threes per game. So I got pissy. Good game last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I want a game 7 on father's day. Cavs got hot, but that type of game will typically result in a Cav's loss (not a lot of ball movement, etc, but LBJ and Kryie hit their shots so it worked). PS: I was a wuss...am on the east coast and fell asleep when there was like 5 minutes to go (such a late start...opposite of my west coast complaints). Didn't help that I was up at 4 AM PST to get out to the east coast the same day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Jun 13, 2016 -> 11:11 PM) They'll never trade Wiggins. Too risky that he's the next big thing. Trade will never get done cause Bulls will demand Wiggins be included IMO. Lawrence loyalty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pettie4sox Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I can't wait for Thibs to destroy the Bulls twice next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 12:11 AM) They'll never trade Wiggins. Too risky that he's the next big thing. Trade will never get done cause Bulls will demand Wiggins be included IMO. Probably not but Thibs isn't married to Wiggins. Wiggins and #5 gets it done for me. I'm not sure Kris Dunn, Zach LaVine, and Dieng is enough for Butler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 05:55 AM) Probably not but Thibs isn't married to Wiggins. Wiggins and #5 gets it done for me. I'm not sure Kris Dunn, Zach LaVine, and Dieng is enough for Butler. Wiggins and the 5th pick and the deal is done. If you don't get Wiggins, I'm not making this deal. By the way, there is no way the Wolves are going to give up the #5 & Wiggins without intense pressure from another team (i.e,. Boston offering the #3, Brooklyn's unprotected pick in next years draft, and like Crowder or Olynk (or however the hell you spell it). I don't think Bulls would turn down either of those deals and to be frank, those are the only type of deals I'm going to make if I were in the Bulls shoes (and I put odds on either team offering up that as relatively low). My preference would be on the Wiggins and the 5th (but I still don't see a lot of reasons why Twolves would do it). Basically unless a huge bidding war breaks out over Butler, I think he stays with the Bulls. The real question is what happens with DRose, imo. I still think he goes somewhere for a late 1st. I don't expect Durant to leave OKC which is what could actually put the Bulls in an interesting spot (regarding Butler) as he'd be the best, potentially on the block asset in the league. My big problem is I don't want Hoiberg around and I don't like Gar. If we had a better coach, I'd be more comfortable moving Butler, but than again, if we had a better coach, I honestly don't think we are talking about moving Butler and instead are talking about moving Rose and finding a good point guard and other young talent to surround around Buckets. So kind of a who knows. I do think Rose needs to leave Chicago and he'll probably get better being another year removed from injuries, etc, but he clearly is too soft of a player and since he isn't a great passer and isn't a great outside shooter, his style isn't going to work that well in this current NBA regime unless he really wants to play aggressive and attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan99 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 08:08 AM) Wiggins and the 5th pick and the deal is done. If you don't get Wiggins, I'm not making this deal. By the way, there is no way the Wolves are going to give up the #5 & Wiggins without intense pressure from another team (i.e,. Boston offering the #3, Brooklyn's unprotected pick in next years draft, and like Crowder or Olynk (or however the hell you spell it). I don't think Bulls would turn down either of those deals and to be frank, those are the only type of deals I'm going to make if I were in the Bulls shoes (and I put odds on either team offering up that as relatively low). My preference would be on the Wiggins and the 5th (but I still don't see a lot of reasons why Twolves would do it). Basically unless a huge bidding war breaks out over Butler, I think he stays with the Bulls. The real question is what happens with DRose, imo. I still think he goes somewhere for a late 1st. I don't expect Durant to leave OKC which is what could actually put the Bulls in an interesting spot (regarding Butler) as he'd be the best, potentially on the block asset in the league. My big problem is I don't want Hoiberg around and I don't like Gar. If we had a better coach, I'd be more comfortable moving Butler, but than again, if we had a better coach, I honestly don't think we are talking about moving Butler and instead are talking about moving Rose and finding a good point guard and other young talent to surround around Buckets. So kind of a who knows. I do think Rose needs to leave Chicago and he'll probably get better being another year removed from injuries, etc, but he clearly is too soft of a player and since he isn't a great passer and isn't a great outside shooter, his style isn't going to work that well in this current NBA regime unless he really wants to play aggressive and attack. The Timberwolves wouldn't trade Wiggins straight up for Butler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (whitesoxfan99 @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 06:47 AM) The Timberwolves wouldn't trade Wiggins straight up for Butler. I think they would. The Bulls would probably do Wiggins plus a combination of other players without the 5 pick. I think getting both would be extremely unlikely, if not impossible, however, if you get a bidding war between teams, who have young assets plus high picks, it does create the potential possibility. I think a Wiggins and a piece deal would be a lot more probable than any deal centered around the 5th pick (Wiggins trade value > 5th pick). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Kyrie is going to try to hero ball it again next game and will go 4-22 and they will lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 What about DeAngelo Russell + another piece for Butler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) Trading Butler for anything other than a top 2 pick in this draft is dumb, even if you get a guy like Wiggins. Why would you trade a franchise player (even a lower end one) for a couple of prospects that percentages say will never pan out? All but about 5 teams in the league continue searching for an all-star quality player to build their team around. The Bulls have one. It would be moronic to let that go. Edited June 14, 2016 by JenksIsMyHero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (greg775 @ Jun 13, 2016 -> 11:31 PM) Holy cow. They couldn't put them away at home. LeBron always has a chance. If Cleveland takes care of business at home, we have a game seven. This could be just like the OKC series in reverse. Golden State blowing a 3-1 lead. Quick Greg, start proclaiming this is Golden States year and no one will stop them.. I wanna see LeBron win one for Cleveland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 09:25 AM) Kyrie is going to try to hero ball it again next game and will go 4-22 and they will lose. Lebron too. He'll keep jacking up those fall away jumpshots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (JenksIsMyHero @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 09:39 AM) Trading Butler for anything other than a top 2 pick in this draft is dumb, even if you get a guy like Wiggins. Why would you trade a franchise player (even a lower end one) for a couple of prospects that percentages say will never pan out? All but about 5 teams in the league continue searching for an all-star quality player to build their team around. The Bulls have one. It would be moronic to let that go. Because Jimmy Butler can't be the best player on a championship team. I'd rather roll with Wiggins and Dunn and the cap relief. I obviously wouldn't do it without Wiggins involved though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jun 14, 2016 -> 09:50 AM) Because Jimmy Butler can't be the best player on a championship team. I'd rather roll with Wiggins and Dunn and the cap relief. I obviously wouldn't do it without Wiggins involved though. He's a great #2 on a very cap friendly deal. He's a piece that can, in theory, attract another star FA to be #1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts