caulfield12 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2015/8/13...royals#comments Kind of pathetic that you are disrespecting your own station's "home team" to help reporters write a story ripping aforementioned team's most famous broadcaster. You can guarantee this wouldn't happen if the White Sox were still going to be on the Score next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Hawk says something moronic and you're upset he got called out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted August 13, 2015 Author Share Posted August 13, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 05:29 PM) Hawk says something moronic and you're upset he got called out? No, just that an employee of the Score is going out of their way to help "call him out"..seems a little petty or vindictive. Edited August 13, 2015 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 06:24 PM) http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2015/8/13...royals#comments Kind of pathetic that you are disrespecting your own station's "home team" to help reporters write a story ripping aforementioned team's most famous broadcaster. You can guarantee this wouldn't happen if the White Sox were still going to be on the Score next year. They have been extra pissy since they lost the White Sox broadcast. No big surprise as their entire schtick is this kind of broadcasting. I can't wait for the Sox to move so I can take them off of my dial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Hawk deserves to be criticized. What he said was f***ing stupid and wrong. It's embarrassing quite frankly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 The beautiful thing about talent is that you can't measure it so you can say pretty much whatever you want about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 (edited) When Cubs move to 670 they will never be called out for any statement at anytime. They all have a Cubby chubby right now. B&B producer involved shocking........NOT! Edited August 13, 2015 by Soxfest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 06:35 PM) They have been extra pissy since they lost the White Sox broadcast. No big surprise as their entire schtick is this kind of broadcasting. I can't wait for the Sox to move so I can take them off of my dial. I'll still listen to Laurence, that's about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 That article is pure garbage... hosmer better than Abreu? lololol. It's funny though.. Hawk is an opinionated guy. If you act like a nice milk warm person then you are safe from criticism. People (including this board) love to "Bash" (I never use that word but I will since its a popular one) Hawk. Hawk is Hawk but this article .... please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 To be fair, the analysis they did isn't particularly convincing. The weight ascribed to starting pitching is to be considered the same as an individual position? What Hawk said is certainly a bit ridiculous, but I don't think it is as nearly as ridiculous as one might initially suggest. The Royals have basically played 180 games of baseball at their current level. They've done it with a roster that is fairly unchanged from their previous 180 games of baseball or so, when they did pretty much suck. So is simply evaluating the rosters, position by position, and somewhat arbitrarily choosing an "edge," without really evaluating how big that edge is and cumulating them in any particularly logical manner, really any better of an analysis than what Hawk did? Baseball is by far the weirdest and most difficult sport to predict in regards to evaluating a paper roster versus on-field results. Utilizing an on-paper analysis to support those very results is therefore by definition, an inaccurate an ineffective manner for such an evaluation. This is part of what makes baseball great, to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 The funny thing was they agreed with Hawk about every position except LF and Hawk did mention "with Gordon out". So postion wise it was at least really close, Hawk thinks the Sox have more talent, they might or might not, but he was absolutely correct in the execution part. If the Sox executed in KC, they probably win at least 2 if not all 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 I am open to any and all criticism of Hawk if it gets him out of the booth quicker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 (edited) Never realized how many white sox fans don't like Hawk until I got to this message board. I love Hawk... sure sometimes I want to strangle him... but he is on my side until all the way. Another thing that's funny is people think Stone is go great or Hawk's victim... Stone is a way bigger arse then Hawk.. I've heard this from more than a few people who have met both of them. Edited August 14, 2015 by harkness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 07:40 PM) I am open to any and all criticism of Hawk if it gets him out of the booth quicker. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickofypres Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Stone forever, Hawk never. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (woods of ypres @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 08:05 PM) Stone forever, Hawk never. LOL What is go great about Stone? Don't get it... I get why people don't like Hawk,,, but Stone? Edited August 14, 2015 by harkness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 I like Stone at this point more than Hawk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron883 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Anybody think Hawk will slip up and say something that may get him fired? He has said some pretty stupid things. The "Latin guys aren't funny in the clubhouse." comment. "Typical Asian motion. Deceptive!" when talking about a submarine asian pitcher. Saying "oriental" sounds kind of weird too. I'm not saying those examples are offensive, but I can see him taking it a step further on accident and offending some people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (ron883 @ Aug 14, 2015 -> 03:16 AM) Anybody think Hawk will slip up and say something that may get him fired? He has said some pretty stupid things. The "Latin guys aren't funny in the clubhouse." comment. "Typical Asian motion. Deceptive!" when talking about a submarine asian pitcher. Saying "oriental" sounds kind of weird too. I'm not saying those examples are offensive, but I can see him taking it a step further on accident and offending some people. Did he really say the Latin thing? That's getting close to fireable offense in the day and age of PC stuff. Hawk is an idiot for saying Sox have more talent though. I agree we might win two positions of the nine. Yes we have better starting pitching and they have a better pen. Their bench is way better. Thing is even though our pitching is better, their scouts are so much better they absolutely know how to get our guys out and keep 'em in the park. So what happens is we basically lose every series against KC and almost every game. That's hard to do when you play 19 times. Edited August 14, 2015 by greg775 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 (edited) I heard hawk say it... it made me lol a bit about the KC talent level... But I couldn't have really given two craps... I also despise the world of fear mongering/politically correct "no balls" talking which we live in now. Edited August 14, 2015 by harkness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 I just wish Hawk would utilize the pause more. He used to be a very good announcer. Now...really bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 09:42 PM) I just wish Hawk would utilize the pause more. He used to be a very good announcer. Now...really bad. Really? Having listened to him for over 20 years he seems the same to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenryan Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 QUOTE (harkness @ Aug 13, 2015 -> 08:54 PM) Never realized how many white sox fans don't like Hawk until I got to this message board. I love Hawk... sure sometimes I want to strangle him... but he is on my side until all the way. Another thing that's funny is people think Stone is go great or Hawk's victim... Stone is a way bigger arse then Hawk.. I've heard this from more than a few people who have met both of them. Hawk is a total douche so that's saying a lot of Stone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 QUOTE (zenryan @ Aug 14, 2015 -> 03:47 AM) Hawk is a total douche so that's saying a lot of Stone. Are both really jerks? Any proof? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Hawk is an idiot. So is pretty much everyone on the Score. Laurence is the truth though, will never not listen to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.webp.29cc6c9fee0f01ceeb4f722593e5e3ba.webp)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.