Panerista Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 20, 2015 -> 07:02 AM) No, they don't. The Cubs coverage is always greater, because they are the greater media product. But per fan interest, there's a reasonable amount of coverage for each when they're both good. This isn't 1993. The Sox have broken the WS drought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 QUOTE (AustinIllini @ Oct 20, 2015 -> 10:49 PM) But per fan interest, there's a reasonable amount of coverage for each when they're both good. This isn't 1993. The Sox have broken the WS drought. That isn't really true. Even in 2012 when the Cubs were terrible and the Sox were in first place most of the year the coverage was not what you would have expected. The Cubs will continue to get favorable coverage barring a dynastic-type run from the Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.