southsider2k5 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 Doug Padilla @DougPadilla 13h13 hours ago Evanston, IL According to @JA_Todd, White Sox have three Super Twos: Dan Jennings (2.171 years service), Avi Garcia (2.167), Zach Putnam (2.135). Full list http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/10/list...qualifiers.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 Surprised Avi had not already passed super 2 status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 Honestly, Putnam and Jennings can go. At least Avi has more potential. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 10:21 AM) Honestly, Putnam and Jennings can go. At least Avi has more potential. I'd keep Putnam. He's pretty solid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (knightni @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 10:21 AM) Honestly, Putnam and Jennings can go. At least Avi has more potential. They're going to cost less than a million apiece. No reason to let them go. Who are you going to get to replace Putnam for that cost? Jennings was pretty damn good after his injury this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 Yeah you definitely keep Putnam especially. If keep him over Avi at this point. Although Yeah you keep all 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 I thought Dan Jennings was like 34 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 11:03 AM) Yeah you definitely keep Putnam especially. If keep him over Avi at this point. Although Yeah you keep all 3. ^ This. All 3 are tenders though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 At the All Star break, Jennings had an ERA of 7.83. He lowered that to 3.99 with a FIP of 3.47. He gave up 8 ER in the 2nd half of the season. You definitely keep him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 11:05 AM) I thought Dan Jennings was like 34 He's 28. Had partial seasons in 2012 and 2013 and his first full in 2014. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 11:13 AM) At the All Star break, Jennings had an ERA of 7.83. He lowered that to 3.99 with a FIP of 3.47. He gave up 8 ER in the 2nd half of the season. You definitely keep him. If you take out his 6 ER in 0.2 innings against the Reds, his ERA for the rest of the season was 3.07. Definitely worth keeping around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 I'd definitely keep Putnam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 12:56 PM) If you take out his 6 ER in 0.2 innings against the Reds, his ERA for the rest of the season was 3.07. Definitely worth keeping around. Yeah, he took one for the team that day, and it changed the look of his numbers for the entire season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sin city sox fan Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 12:56 PM) If you take out his 6 ER in 0.2 innings against the Reds, his ERA for the rest of the season was 3.07. Definitely worth keeping around. If you take out all the earned runs he gave up all season, his ERA is 0.00......not too shabby!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (sin city sox fan @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 01:02 PM) If you take out all the earned runs he gave up all season, his ERA is 0.00......not too shabby!! It's not really cherry-picking if 1 out of 53 appearances makes your numbers look much worse than they really were, and his ERA and FIP even with that appearance weren't that bad anyway. It's not like I took out 10 appearances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 01:09 PM) It's not really cherry-picking if 1 out of 53 appearances makes your numbers look much worse than they really were, and his ERA and FIP even with that appearance weren't that bad anyway. It's not like I took out 10 appearances. Especially in a situation where he was left out there on purpose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 You gotta keep my boy Zach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 12:05 PM) I thought Dan Jennings was like 34 Nah, just a name that sounds like it belongs to a 34 year old Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 29, 2015 Author Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (raBBit @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 02:43 PM) I know you can do this on any pitcher but Jennings also came in on Opening Day, walked someone, intentionally walked Morales to get to Gordon and then he gets Gordon hit a weak grounder up the middle that Micah Johnson just stopped and watched go by him. Jennings should have gone 1/3 with no runs. Instead he went 0.0 with 3 runs. If Carlos Sanchez was playing second base that inning he would have an ERA of 3.49 instead of 3.99 on the year. Again, I am aware you can do this with any pitcher but I remember thinking, this sucks for Jennings when it happened. Which matches his FIP almost exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lasttriptotulsa Posted October 29, 2015 Share Posted October 29, 2015 QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 01:50 PM) Nah, just a name that sounds like it belongs to a 34 year old Sounds more like a 55 year old GM turned manager to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.