Hatchetman Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/11/11/lev...ebuilding-mode/ “Last year we saw the opportunity to be aggressive and address certain areas of need,” Hahn said. “We wanted to build around the core we had. In the future, you would want your core to be bigger and activity in free agency being a little less.” “We are trying to do this (rebuild properly) as soon as possible,” Hahn said. “If you look at the teams right now that you would praise or emulate — Houston, Kansas City, the Cubs and Pittsburgh — they all spent a minimum of five years under .500. They did it by the draft, trades and international signings. So there is a template out there that shows it takes time.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 So in other words nothing new. Same plan as before. Thanks Bruce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 07:51 PM) http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/11/11/lev...ebuilding-mode/ “Last year we saw the opportunity to be aggressive and address certain areas of need,” Hahn said. “We wanted to build around the core we had. In the future, you would want your core to be bigger and activity in free agency being a little less.” “We are trying to do this (rebuild properly) as soon as possible,” Hahn said. “If you look at the teams right now that you would praise or emulate — Houston, Kansas City, the Cubs and Pittsburgh — they all spent a minimum of five years under .500. They did it by the draft, trades and international signings. So there is a template out there that shows it takes time.” so is he insinuating that now it is a 5 yr plan instead of 3 yr ????? is it safe to assume that it is now yr what of how many, ye 2 or 5 or is it now 5 more yrs??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 I'll be honest, with the Rick Someone mistake, I couldn't take anything else Levine wrote seriously. https://twitter.com/WriteSox/status/664479541549621248 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) I mean if they are going for 5 years then trade Sale and Jose Abreu. Jerry should fire them immediately if that's the plan. Edited November 11, 2015 by Baron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 12:51 PM) http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/11/11/lev...ebuilding-mode/ “Last year we saw the opportunity to be aggressive and address certain areas of need,” Hahn said. “We wanted to build around the core we had. In the future, you would want your core to be bigger and activity in free agency being a little less.” “We are trying to do this (rebuild properly) as soon as possible,” Hahn said. “If you look at the teams right now that you would praise or emulate — Houston, Kansas City, the Cubs and Pittsburgh — they all spent a minimum of five years under .500. They did it by the draft, trades and international signings. So there is a template out there that shows it takes time.” What we don't know is how satisfied Rick Han is with his core group of players. If he is satisfied with that group, they may not be as aggressive in free agency. In referring to the template that KC, Cubs and Pittsburgh took, he's only acknowledging that there are different options to rebuild. I think he's more interested in the express rebuilding plan. The White Sox are a top heavy club - some stars and excellent building blocks with Sale, Quintana, Rodon, Robertson, Abreu, Melky Cabrera, Eaton and maybe a few of their bullpen arms. That's maybe 10-12 guys if we stretch it a bit and there are major deficiencies in defensive play and offense. Are they going to be able to add 5-7 useful players to the roster that can contribute to a 2016 roster without dipping into free agency? Unlikely. I would expect them to add 3-5 players in free agency (some of them could be bargain shopping that they hope to get value from), and a trade could bring immediate help in 1-2 spots as well depending on their level of aggression. Overall, it would be surprising to me if the Sox didn't have an active off-season since this is a team NOT taking the 5 year rebuilding path. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 08:05 PM) so is he insinuating that now it is a 5 yr plan instead of 3 yr ????? is it safe to assume that it is now yr what of how many, year 2 or 5 or is it now 5 more yrs??? i guess i am just as bad as levine, i am making a pun of his article to stir the pot.... i admit it. but really, can't a professional reporter do a better job?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (spiderman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 08:16 PM) What we don't know is how satisfied Rick Han is with his core group of players. If he is satisfied with that group, they may not be as aggressive in free agency. In referring to the template that KC, Cubs and Pittsburgh took, he's only acknowledging that there are different options to rebuild. I think he's more interested in the express rebuilding plan. The White Sox are a top heavy club - some stars and excellent building blocks with Sale, Quintana, Rodon, Robertson, Abreu, Melky Cabrera, Eaton and maybe a few of their bullpen arms. That's maybe 10-12 guys if we stretch it a bit and there are major deficiencies in defensive play and offense. Are they going to be able to add 5-7 useful players to the roster that can contribute to a 2016 roster without dipping into free agency? Unlikely. I would expect them to add 3-5 players in free agency (some of them could be bargain shopping that they hope to get value from), and a trade could bring immediate help in 1-2 spots as well depending on their level of aggression. Overall, it would be surprising to me if the Sox didn't have an active off-season since this is a team NOT taking the 5 year rebuilding path. a really nice post. for this discussion only, i really like this idea of it is a full blown rebuild after last yr disaster, then the sox really have a great group to assemble many prospects. however, i can see that the sox really can't do that and again it is b/c of the success of the northside team. they can not let them get more entrenched with the idea of success and that team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:06 PM) I'll be honest, with the Rick Someone mistake, I couldn't take anything else Levine wrote seriously. https://twitter.com/WriteSox/status/664479541549621248 My god, how does guy have a job as a baseball writer? Here's a groundbreaking tweet from him: Bruce Levine @MLBBruceLevine 2h Sully is my personal photographer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 Bruce's tweets are just awful...like his reporting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchetman Posted November 11, 2015 Author Share Posted November 11, 2015 so you guys think these are phony quotes or is it that Hahn's words were not intended to convey any message. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:29 PM) so you guys think these are phony quotes or is it that Hahn's words were not intended to convey any message. Re-reading the article I think he is obviously trying to put things into perspective. All of these other teams that people want to emulate took between 5 and 10 years of being awful to get to where they are now. The Sox are trying to speed that time line up. He is trying to realign expectations a bit, but still send the message that they aren't punting for a half of a decade. At no point does he say they are starting a new rebuild, only continuing what they started a few years back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spiderman Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:20 PM) a really nice post. for this discussion only, i really like this idea of it is a full blown rebuild after last yr disaster, then the sox really have a great group to assemble many prospects. however, i can see that the sox really can't do that and again it is b/c of the success of the northside team. they can not let them get more entrenched with the idea of success and that team. I do think it's a mistake to be making decision (specifically strategic decisions that could impact the club for a decade) around how the Cubs are performing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (spiderman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 07:31 PM) I do think it's a mistake to be making decision (specifically strategic decisions that could impact the club for a decade) around how the Cubs are performing. Problem is that the Chicago media now thinks it's the only way you can build a team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 08:29 PM) so you guys think these are phony quotes or is it that Hahn's words were not intended to convey any message. quotes and misquotes can be taken out of any quotations that is given. i believe when he said that the sox are trying to do it quickly. that i believe. now come what i choose to believe in or in this case what not to believe. the rest. for me it was probably meant to say that most rebuilds takes x amount of yrs and the sox knows this but are trying to do it faster. until a second, third source are saying the same thing, i chose not to believe in levine stories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (spiderman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 08:31 PM) I do think it's a mistake to be making decision (specifically strategic decisions that could impact the club for a decade) around how the Cubs are performing. if the sox were the only team in this city, no.... but this club had a WS ring and yet this team plays 2 nd fiddle. why??? i have voiced my ideas. i really don't really want to rehash my lost faith in the owners and the FO. so the answer to your question is yes, they have to keep an eye on the golden ring and not let the media and popularity get too far out of reach. those remaining die hard fans are finding it a rough time keeping the faith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (fathom @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:34 PM) Problem is that the Chicago media now thinks it's the only way you can build a team. What's continually frustrating about it is that this Cubs team was not built by high draft picks for the most part, and they have the money to hand out multiple 9 figure deals, something we'll never be able to do. Edited November 11, 2015 by OmarComing25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Zelig Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:43 PM) What's continually frustrating about it is that this Cubs team was not built by high draft picks for the most part, and they have the money to hand out multiple 6 figure deals, something we'll never be able to do. The Sox have plenty of players making 6 figures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:54 PM) The Sox have plenty of players making 6 figures. Everybody in the league makes six figures. Probably meant 9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchetman Posted November 11, 2015 Author Share Posted November 11, 2015 Hahn's quotes seem to be different from the "all in" type of rhetoric we heard last offseason. So a change in strategic philosophy? Intentionally tempering expectations for 2016? Does this mean trading away Quintana? There are no rumors going around so this is the best I have to ponder over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (shysocks @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:58 PM) Everybody in the league makes six figures. Probably meant 9. Haha yes I did mean 9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (fathom @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 01:34 PM) Problem is that the Chicago media now thinks it's the only way you can build a team. sadly that is for every sport and 90% of sports fans as well The Bears need to trade everyone for high draft picks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Bosley Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 02:31 PM) Re-reading the article I think he is obviously trying to put things into perspective. All of these other teams that people want to emulate took between 5 and 10 years of being awful to get to where they are now. The Sox are trying to speed that time line up. He is trying to realign expectations a bit, but still send the message that they aren't punting for a half of a decade. At no point does he say they are starting a new rebuild, only continuing what they started a few years back. On the contrary - that's exactly the message he's conveying. When he talks about a template to "praise" or "emulate" that involves a record below .500 for a "minimum of five years", then that's him realigning our expectations, big time. Gladly (if you can actually use that word this way), to your point, we are not starting that rebuild right now. Many aspects of a rebuild started in 2013, stalled only by last offseason's activity. But in resuming those rebuild efforts now, by the time this team is competitive again, given the current state of the team, "half of a decade" and maybe then some will have been "punted". Think 2013 to whichever the next year is that we'll be competitive after this rebuild is complete. Unless you think rebuild efforts involving obtaining young, cost-controlled players will somehow make us competitive in the next couple of years. Edited November 11, 2015 by Thad Bosley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 09:49 PM) On the contrary - that's exactly the message he's conveying. When he talks about a template to "praise" or "emulate" that involves a record below .500 for a "minimum of five years", then that's him realigning our expectations, big time. Gladly (if you can actually use that word this way), to your point, we are not starting that rebuild right now. Many aspects of a rebuild started in 2013, stalled only by last offseason's activity. But in resuming those rebuild efforts now, by the time this team is competitive again, given the current state of the team, "half of a decade" and maybe then some will have been "punted". Think 2013 to whichever the next year is that we'll be competitive after this rebuild is complete. Unless you think rebuild efforts involving obtaining young, cost-controlled players will somehow make us competitive in the next couple of years. and that is what i am hoping it means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Nov 11, 2015 -> 08:04 PM) Hahn's quotes seem to be different from the "all in" type of rhetoric we heard last offseason. So a change in strategic philosophy? Intentionally tempering expectations for 2016? Does this mean trading away Quintana? There are no rumors going around so this is the best I have to ponder over. trading Q will always be an option. now maybe moreso than before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.