Jump to content

Jason Heyward to Cubs (8 yrs 184M)


GGajewski18

Recommended Posts

Seems a lot like Alex Rios before he signed his extension with the Jays. He will always play good defense, though it is likely that he starts to lose a step at this point as he ages and his defensive value will come back to the pack. The bat is never going to be enough to justify what he is going to get. I hope the Cubs sign him, I would love to see him be an anchor around their neck in three years when he is making $20M + a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 438
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (IowaSoxFan @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 09:02 AM)
Seems a lot like Alex Rios before he signed his extension with the Jays. He will always play good defense, though it is likely that he starts to lose a step at this point as he ages and his defensive value will come back to the pack. The bat is never going to be enough to justify what he is going to get. I hope the Cubs sign him, I would love to see him be an anchor around their neck in three years when he is making $20M + a season.

3 years from now, Heyward will be 29 years old.. and probably having the best season of his career

 

He is probably a good bet to be 5-6 WAR for the first 6 years of the deal.

Edited by Knackattack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stats driving his price (defense and base running) to me are more of a gray area that are being rewarded for uncertain future rewards.

 

If the cub sign him for 10/$200M this is yet another step back for their process as I think every move they have made this off-season will lead to a regression in the overall scope of the process.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Knackattack @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 09:09 AM)
3 years from now, Heyward will be 29 years old.. and probably having the best season of his career

 

He is probably a good bet to be 5-6 WAR for the first 6 years of the deal.

And he'll likely have an opt out for 3-4 years down the road, where he'll capitalize on one last contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 11:25 AM)
And he'll likely have an opt out for 3-4 years down the road, where he'll capitalize on one last contract.

Which in this case will be awesome. Part of the reason I want him. I get player opt-out is hugely in the players favor, but here you get the best of his years likely won't have to worry about what will be an awful back end of the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 11:28 AM)
Which in this case will be awesome. Part of the reason I want him. I get player opt-out is hugely in the players favor, but here you get the best of his years likely won't have to worry about what will be an awful back end of the contract.

I can't explain how much I agree with this...

 

Hell, I'd give him a 10 year/$250 million deal with a player opt-out after year 4. Then the Sox would have him in his age 26-30 seasons and then he'll be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Knackattack @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 11:09 AM)
3 years from now, Heyward will be 29 years old.. and probably having the best season of his career

 

He is probably a good bet to be 5-6 WAR for the first 6 years of the deal.

 

Yes he will be 29, but players that rely on their athleticism as much as he does to be productive begin to decline much faster than others. These are the same arguments that were made when the Jays gave albatross contracts to Wells and Rios only to have to regret it almost immediately.

 

According to stats and stuff, this would have been his peak season offensively.

 

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/hitters-no-...k-only-decline/

 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2015/01/...SYuK/story.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 11:32 AM)
I can't explain how much I agree with this...

 

Hell, I'd give him a 10 year/$250 million deal with a player opt-out after year 4. Then the Sox would have him in his age 26-30 seasons and then he'll be gone.

What if he fractures his ankle in year 3 and can't run like before. That team is stuck with the entire contract. I wouldn't take that chance with the budget constraints the Sox have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 09:28 AM)
Which in this case will be awesome. Part of the reason I want him. I get player opt-out is hugely in the players favor, but here you get the best of his years likely won't have to worry about what will be an awful back end of the contract.

I was having a discussion with Kalapse and he convinced me that the player opt-out, especially for younger guys, is actually a good thing, since you get the prime years without as much of the longer-term risk. Plus the opt-out gives them that additional "hunger" towards the opportunity to strike another massive deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ptatc @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 09:40 AM)
What if he fractures his ankle in year 3 and can't run like before. That team is stuck with the entire contract. I wouldn't take that chance with the budget constraints the Sox have.

If I had an opt out, it would probably be a 7 year deal with an opt-out after year 3 or 4, but I agree with you, you have to be careful. No matter what you do, you can't bank any assumption that they will take the opt-out so you have to be comfortable with the thought of going the full way. 10 years with the Sox payroll constraints doesn't make a lot of sense, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 11:55 AM)
Nothing to indicate that on Ken's twitter.

 

Ken Rosenthal ‏@Ken_Rosenthal 5m5 minutes ago

#STLCards out on Heyward, sources tell me and @jonmorosi. @dgoold had indicated they no longer were in play.

 

Jon Heyman ‏@JonHeymanCBS 6m6 minutes ago

Cubs definitely still in mix for heyward, with decision coming soon. Nats, and according to @dgoold cardinals, discouraged

 

this is just what i'm going off, seems like they're pointing towards the cubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (knightni @ Dec 11, 2015 -> 10:20 AM)
19 HR 68 RBI 17 SB 72 BB 123 K .268 AVG .353 OBP .431 SLG .784 OPS

 

Averages in career.

 

He hasn't hit more than 14 HR in 4 seasons.

 

Basically his career averages are close to Adam Eaton's 2015 season.

 

Let some other team overpay for him. I don't want him on the Sox!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...