southsider2k5 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 This is based on how you feel right now about the trade, and not what happens a year from now. Give your gut reaction, did the Sox or Reds win? Vote now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 I need another option. Depends...if we add another impact bat, yes. That is my answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Dodgers, maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3GamesToLove Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Well, the Reds definitely didn't win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Misspelled Frazier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 (edited) My reaction was what is next? I am no prospect lover, but they have to keep going if they are trying to win. They cannot stop here, or they lose the trade. If they do and fall short, whether you love Trayce, Micah, and Montas, hate them or are indifferent, it makes no sense to trade them for a guy who will be around 2 years, if you are going to be a .500 or so team. You need to do whatever you can to get into the playoffs. Now it is about spending some money. Spend it JR. Get the guy that will take you over the top, and melt the doom and gloomers like the Wicked Witch of the West. Then it is a huge White Sox win. Edited December 16, 2015 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 11:11 AM) My reaction was what is next? I am no prospect lover, but they have to keep going if they are trying to win. They cannot stop here. If they do and fall short, whether you love Trayce, Micah, and Montas, hate them or are indifferent, it makes no sense to trade them for a guy who will be around 2 years, if you are going to be a .500 or so team. You need to do whatever you can to get into the playoffs. Now it is about spending some money. Spend it JR. Get the guy that will take you over the top, and melt the doom and gloomers like the Wicked Witch of the West. Ding ding ding. Sums it up perfectly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 16, 2015 Author Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 01:10 PM) Misspelled Frazier Got it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaconOnAStick Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Do you want me to migrate my annoying b****ing to this thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Yeah, gimme option C: I'll Tell Ya Later Right now I honestly believe what we gave up was fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 11:11 AM) My reaction was what is next? I am no prospect lover, but they have to keep going if they are trying to win. They cannot stop here, or they lose the trade. If they do and fall short, whether you love Trayce, Micah, and Montas, hate them or are indifferent, it makes no sense to trade them for a guy who will be around 2 years, if you are going to be a .500 or so team. You need to do whatever you can to get into the playoffs. Now it is about spending some money. Spend it JR. Get the guy that will take you over the top, and melt the doom and gloomers like the Wicked Witch of the West. Then it is a huge White Sox win. well said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 My reaction is: fair price for the player returned, totally the wrong type of move for this franchise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 well, i have been reading and waiting for the smoke to clear. the sox finally got their man. the cost i can live with, but really do i have any say on that???\ it is a confusing trade, not the cincy part but the sox and dodgers part. the sox gave up mj, tt a montas. mj will replace dodger 2b, tt will replace their 4th of and well montas will replace a nice 3b prospect. so why involve cincy??? i like 2 or the 3 players are sending to cincy, my neg of the dodger side is scott. i would love their 2b and 3b prospects and have written mock trades with those 2 names involve. what i see, the sox wanted and needed a 3b who is also establish in the majors. so the trade was for the now and not for the future. the could have gotten their 2b and 3b prospects and really address the future of the infield but they want to now win . dodger got a really cost effective rp to be brought in, i bet mid season and ready for the playoff. also it reaffirms my idea of that they, the dodgers want to be more cost conscience. at the end, cincy got their promising 2b and 3b prospects. that in itself should prove the win now cost at this time of the sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 01:11 PM) My reaction was what is next? I am no prospect lover, but they have to keep going if they are trying to win. They cannot stop here, or they lose the trade. If they do and fall short, whether you love Trayce, Micah, and Montas, hate them or are indifferent, it makes no sense to trade them for a guy who will be around 2 years, if you are going to be a .500 or so team. You need to do whatever you can to get into the playoffs. Now it is about spending some money. Spend it JR. Get the guy that will take you over the top, and melt the doom and gloomers like the Wicked Witch of the West. Then it is a huge White Sox win. Completely agree Dick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitekrazy Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 02:28 PM) My reaction is: fair price for the player returned, totally the wrong type of move for this franchise. Please elaborate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (kitekrazy @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 02:33 PM) Please elaborate. A few weeks ago, the Mariners were making "Win now" moves and people said "what on Earth are they doing"? The Tigers made their "win now moves" and people shrugged because they don't have the team or organization around them to support winning with those guys. I put us in exactly that same boat, continuing to sacrifice the long term on bets that "This team is ready to win right now", which to me, is exactly how we've gotten the last 5+ seasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggins Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Given what was lost and what was gained, I love it for the Sox and Dodgers. Poor job by the Reds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (LDF @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 01:29 PM) well, i have been reading and waiting for the smoke to clear. the sox finally got their man. the cost i can live with, but really do i have any say on that???\ it is a confusing trade, not the cincy part but the sox and dodgers part. the sox gave up mj, tt a montas. mj will replace dodger 2b, tt will replace their 4th of and well montas will replace a nice 3b prospect. so why involve cincy??? i like 2 or the 3 players are sending to cincy, my neg of the dodger side is scott. i would love their 2b and 3b prospects and have written mock trades with those 2 names involve. what i see, the sox wanted and needed a 3b who is also establish in the majors. so the trade was for the now and not for the future. the could have gotten their 2b and 3b prospects and really address the future of the infield but they want to now win . dodger got a really cost effective rp to be brought in, i bet mid season and ready for the playoff. also it reaffirms my idea of that they, the dodgers want to be more cost conscience. at the end, cincy got their promising 2b and 3b prospects. that in itself should prove the win now cost at this time of the sox. I don't think you can grade this trade without seeing what else the front office has planned for the offseason. I fully expect the Sox to aggressively pursue Cespedes, Gordon or Upton and land one of those three players in order for the Frazier deal to make more sense. You have Chris Sale and Jose Abreu locked up and in their primes...don't waste that opportunity. With Danks and LaRoche coming off the books after this season the White Sox should have money to spend to land another bat to get this team competitive. OF - Eaton OF- Cabrera 1B - Abreu 3B - Frazier OF - FA Signing Cespedes/Upton/Gordon DH - LaRoche (pray he bounces back) 2B - Lawrie SS - Saladino/Anderson/FA Signing C - Navarro/Avila That lineup would be considerably better than the past few seasons and would make for an interesting season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (daggins @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 08:38 PM) Given what was lost and what was gained, I love it for the Sox and Dodgers. Poor job by the Reds. actually i think it is different, cincy did great ...... only the sox got what they been coveting for dodgers sacrifice the most, they have the best setup of the 3 team and a nice farm, but to go for the rp of the future without the cost of the fa price tag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 I think the Reds/Dodgers need to be separated. The Dodgers are clearly winners in this trade. Their involvement in it at all is really perplexing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 08:41 PM) I don't think you can grade this trade without seeing what else the front office has planned for the offseason. I fully expect the Sox to aggressively pursue Cespedes, Gordon or Upton and land one of those three players in order for the Frazier deal to make more sense. You have Chris Sale and Jose Abreu locked up and in their primes...don't waste that opportunity. With Danks and LaRoche coming off the books after this season the White Sox should have money to spend to land another bat to get this team competitive. OF - Eaton OF- Cabrera 1B - Abreu 3B - Frazier OF - FA Signing Cespedes/Upton/Gordon DH - LaRoche (pray he bounces back) 2B - Lawrie SS - Saladino/Anderson/FA Signing C - Navarro/Avila That lineup would be considerably better than the past few seasons and would make for an interesting season you like many others want to judge the trade at face value. and at face value i have stated the frazier provides what the sox have been searching for, and the price is ok with me. but there is alot of smoke around the edges of this trade that i am looking at, the long term possibilities of this. the positives followed by a negative. they will now compete on close to equal footing with the northiside. if they address both their of'er and dh. (screw this b/s of laroche) keeping this sp rotation in tact without trading anyone needing to sign and additional sp great offense on the 2b and 3b they will need to bring in alexei - ss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEdWalsh Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 12:11 PM) My reaction was what is next? I am no prospect lover, but they have to keep going if they are trying to win. They cannot stop here, or they lose the trade. If they do and fall short, whether you love Trayce, Micah, and Montas, hate them or are indifferent, it makes no sense to trade them for a guy who will be around 2 years, if you are going to be a .500 or so team. You need to do whatever you can to get into the playoffs. Now it is about spending some money. Spend it JR. Get the guy that will take you over the top, and melt the doom and gloomers like the Wicked Witch of the West. Then it is a huge White Sox win. Sums it up quite well. Anybody saying the Sox aren't the clear winner here is nuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 With so many prospects involved there is no way to determine a winner in the trade until the prospects have had time to show what they can or cannot do. However, the Sox got their guy so that is an overall win for the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 08:02 PM) With so many prospects involved there is no way to determine a winner in the trade until the prospects have had time to show what they can or cannot do. However, the Sox got their guy so that is an overall win for the team. excellent, now i will use greg post on another thread. but i will need to add another statement to it. if the sox can fix both the dh and of'er, with key players and without loosing anyone key prospects. i will sing this from the highest building. time to go and get your season tickets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 02:02 PM) With so many prospects involved there is no way to determine a winner in the trade until the prospects have had time to show what they can or cannot do. However, the Sox got their guy so that is an overall win for the team. That's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is the current value of all those involved. The results-oriented view can be flawed. If the Angels traded Mike Trout tomorrow for some guy drafted in the 37th round, and Trout became crippled in a freak accident the next day, while the 37th rounder became a HOF, that was still a stupid trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.