Jump to content

2016 Republican Thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (raBBit @ Sep 8, 2016 -> 01:25 PM)
Scandals have been building far before the primaries and while I am sure you know that, but it should still be mentioned. Kind of like when Benghzai was at its height Hillary ended up in the hospital.

 

At the same time, the Democrat thread is complaining that it's a media conspiracy she's not being covered as much as Trump. In all likelihood, that's what her team wants. Let's have Trump on TV with topics like racism and nukes while Hillary avoids press conferences like the plague.

 

Totally this. They have to love this. The more the election is about Trump saying stupid stuff, the less that Clinton actually has to be a candidate herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Sep 8, 2016 -> 05:06 PM)
Yup. Trump's smorgasbord of embarrassment is the only reason Hillary is still leading. Romney would have a decisive lead if he were the nominee. Trump might be the only reason Hillary can play hide and seek as she continually gets exposed as the most corrupt politician of her generation

 

So much so that the left wasted the right wing label on guys like McCain and Romney, that they had to invent a new label because no one cared about the old one anymore... in lieu of anything resembling the sale of their own candidate to the electorate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Sep 8, 2016 -> 01:29 PM)
I don't think anyone in the dem thread was "complaining" about that, just explaining to greg why Trump dominates the news. I'd definitely agree that Clinton's strategy has been to stand back while he's constantly lighting himself on fire.

It's the only strategy she has. She can speak toward the issues, but they don't resonate. She can speak negatively about Trump, and it hurts her numbers. Her only hope if that Trump "free styles" in his speeches. If not, she's dead on arrival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 11:35 AM)
Hillary pulled a Trump and shot herself in the foot at a pretty inopportune time. Calling millions of Americans baskets of deplorables, saying theyre irredeemable and racist, homophobic, xenophobic etc.

Saying that to those who cheered on calls that Mexicans are rapists and Muslims are evil and now those people aren't big fans of name calling? That's rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 01:58 PM)
Saying that to those who cheered on calls that Mexicans are rapists and Muslims are evil and now those people aren't big fans of name calling? That's rich.

She said half of his supporters. To imply that many Americans are irredeemable is a pretty toxic statement from someone running for President. Apparently she agrees because she is already trying to walk it back. No doubt this is gonna hurt her in the polls, she didnt need this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 07:14 PM)
She said half of his supporters. To imply that many Americans are irredeemable is a pretty toxic statement from someone running for President. Apparently she agrees because she is already trying to walk it back. No doubt this is gonna hurt her in the polls, she didnt need this.

She's elitist for sure. I'm shocked people can't figure this out. Her popularity is baffling. She's not out to help anybody not named Hillary, Bill, Chelsea and I'm sorry her son in law's name escapes me and her grandkid's name escapes me. Aside from those five, forget about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 02:14 PM)
She said half of his supporters. To imply that many Americans are irredeemable is a pretty toxic statement from someone running for President. Apparently she agrees because she is already trying to walk it back. No doubt this is gonna hurt her in the polls, she didnt need this.

 

It may nor have been politically correct, but look at the poll results for people who support Trump.

 

This is a guy who started off his campaign by calling Mexican immigrants murderers and rapists,and before that he was the leading birther in the country. White nationalism forms a significant core for him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 04:04 PM)
It may nor have been politically correct, but look at the poll results for people who support Trump.

 

This is a guy who started off his campaign by calling Mexican immigrants murderers and rapists,and before that he was the leading birther in the country. White nationalism forms a significant core for him.

The difference is Im not defending the things Trump says because I agree that theyre wrong. Democrats rallying to defend this is so hypocritical its almost surreal. If these candidates want to call each other every name in the book thats one thing but to say 10s of millions of American citizens are deplorable and say theyre irredeemable is actually a new low for this entire election. Hillary's campaign is now no better than Trump's.

 

Before I get anymore "but but but Trump" you need to realize there is an entire thread of people going at Trump for everything from his alleged mob ties to him being a Russian operative and you dont see people in there trying to defend him, so coming in here and trying to discredit any criticism of Hillary is pretty ridiculous. I dont like Trump and I dont like Hillary and I criticize both of them. But what Hillary said was pretty terrible, extremely hypocritical and is likely going to really sting her in the polls and we should be allowed to discuss it without people treating us like were brain dead Trump supporters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone is accusing you of supporting Trump, db. You've been pretty clear on that before many times. I don't see anyone attacking you here like that, and I apologize if my post came across like that.

 

And you're probably not wrong about this being a politically damaging thing for her to have said. She's already backed off and apologized likely for that very reason.

 

What I'm saying is that she isn't wrong to say that a sizeable chunk of the support for Trump is for deplorable reasons if not people who are irredeemably deplorable. Watch nyt video of supporters at his rallies, look at the alt right types who support him, look how many of his supporters think Obama is a Kenyan Muslim. It feels like some of the reaction to this is that it's worse to call someone racist than it is to actually be racist.

 

Edit I actually hadn't heard the irredeemable part originally, that is worse than the "basket of deplorable"

 

But you're also right that, really, this isn't the thread for that even if those de facto rules have broken down in both threads lately.

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 05:32 PM)
I don't think anyone is accusing you of supporting Trump, db. You've been pretty clear on that before many times. I don't see anyone attacking you here like that, and I apologize if my post came across like that.

 

And you're probably not wrong about this being a politically damaging thing for her to have said. She's already backed off and apologized likely for that very reason.

 

What I'm saying is that she isn't wrong to say that a sizeable chunk of the support for Trump is for deplorable reasons if not people who are irredeemably deplorable. Watch nyt video of supporters at his rallies, look at the alt right types who support him, look how many of his supporters think Obama is a Kenyan Muslim. It feels like some of the reaction to this is that it's worse to call someone racist than it is to actually be racist.

 

But you're also right that, really, this isn't the thread for that even if those de facto rules have broken down in both threads lately.

Fair enough. There are certainly a large portion of his supporters who are pretty s***ty. I dont know why this just really bothered me. As far as I know I dont think Trump has even stooped low enough to criticize Hillary's supporters. The word irredeemable is just such a horrible thing to call people that youre trying to govern.

 

My post probably came off worse than I meant it to. In all honesty I am so enthralled in this election I love discussing it with knowledgeable people, which Soxtalk as a lot of, but it just seems like a lot of people have been posting less because people on both sides (myself obviously included) are quick to jump on others with differing opinions. With how bats*** insane this election is it would be nice if everyone was more comfortable discussing things without fear of backlash. I mean we have 4 of the absolute worst presidential candidates running (5 if you include Evan McMullin lol) and Im hoping as we get closer to the election there is more civil discussion because twitter is making my eyes bleed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Sep 10, 2016 -> 04:04 PM)
It may nor have been politically correct, but look at the poll results for people who support Trump.

 

This is a guy who started off his campaign by calling Mexican immigrants murderers and rapists,and before that he was the leading birther in the country. White nationalism forms a significant core for him.

 

Racism is OK if it supports my candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama had his comment about guns and clinging to religion.

 

Romney had his "WASP code words" 47% comments.

 

In the end, the main thing she was wrong about was irredeemable...you can never say that as a Christoan, let alone political candidate.

 

Deplorable actions....but you can't label a group of 25% of the people deplorable when your husband's trade pacts contributed mightily to that. Of course, those same people would never surrender their low low prices at Wal Mart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...