Jump to content

2016 Cubs catch-all thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 06:28 AM)
Kyle Hendricks career line: .076/.116/.086.

 

They deserve all the credit for what a great "HITTER " they developed there

 

Hard-hitting analysis! Cubs pitchers can't bat. This argument would be so funny if it weren't so sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Deadpool @ Jul 10, 2016 -> 10:40 PM)
You forgot the

 

IN THE DRAFT part. It is critical we find talent in the field IN THE DRAFT. Tim Anderson is a good start (although he walks less than Bran Stark). That needs to happen ALL THE TIME.

 

How are you not on TV with this sick combination of advanced baseball knowledge, snarky jokes, and ability to always keep it real and not be one of those yucky "fans"?

 

Hope you got a Costco membership, bulk buying Jergens is in your best interests financially at the rate you're burning through it every time someone says the C word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (hawksfan61 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 08:30 PM)
How are you not on TV with this sick combination of advanced baseball knowledge, snarky jokes, and ability to always keep it real and not be one of those yucky "fans"?

 

Hope you got a Costco membership, bulk buying Jergens is in your best interests financially at the rate you're burning through it every time someone says the C word.

The walk hasn't been an "advanced stat" in like 100 years, but thanks for playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (hawksfan61 @ Jul 11, 2016 -> 09:10 PM)
Who said anything about stats?

Walks aren't "advanced baseball knowledge". They're common sense.

 

A BA of .300 is good, but a OBP of .300 really isn't. His OBP needs to improve. Walk more.

Edited by Deadpool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 09:44 AM)
Unlike the Sox, the game actually means something for the cubs.

You're right, because if the NL loses, the Cubs get a DH to bolster their lineup for an extra game in the World Series. That's assuming a lot, of course. The Cubs couldn't really lose this game.

Edited by Deadpool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Deadpool @ Jul 13, 2016 -> 04:29 AM)
You're right, because if the NL loses, the Cubs get a DH to bolster their lineup for an extra game in the World Series. That's assuming a lot, of course. The Cubs couldn't really lose this game.

 

This makes no sense. Of course they want home field advantage if they can get it. 6 of last 7 teams with home field advantage won the WS

Edited by fathom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Deadpool @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 10:29 PM)
You're right, because if the NL loses, the Cubs get a DH to bolster their lineup for an extra game in the World Series. That's assuming a lot, of course. The Cubs couldn't really lose this game.

 

LOL!! Yeah, right...the Cubs (or ANY NL team for that matter) didn't want home field advantage "IF" they get to the World Series. Give me a break. You really are completely consumed by the hype, so much so that you come up with some nonsensical bullcrap when 6 of the last 7 World Series' have been won by the team with home field advantage. Go read some more comic books. #rentfree

Edited by soxfan85
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Deadpool @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 10:29 PM)
You're right, because if the NL loses, the Cubs get a DH to bolster their lineup for an extra game in the World Series. That's assuming a lot, of course. The Cubs couldn't really lose this game.

Wow...just a terrible post. Maybe you should start trolling Red Sox & Blue Jays message boards with this nonsense and see how quickly you get ripped apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 10:33 PM)
This makes no sense. Of course they want home field advantage if they can get it. 6 of last 7 teams with home field advantage won the WS

Sure, but they have the lineup to take advantage of the DH slot.

 

If we are going off meaningless correlation, 5 of the last 7 WS teams have been in the NL.

 

QUOTE (soxfan85 @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 10:39 PM)
LOL!! Yeah, right...the Cubs (or ANY NL team for that matter) didn't want home field advantage "IF" they get to the World Series. Give me a break. You really are completely consumed by the hype, so much so that you come up with some nonsensical bullcrap when 6 of the last 7 World Series' have been won by the team with home field advantage. Go read some more comic books. #rentfree

Hashtags? Your mom called, she said you should be in bed. Get to your porn porn and let the adults talk.

 

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 11:22 PM)
Wow...just a terrible post. Maybe you should start trolling Red Sox & Blue Jays message boards with this nonsense and see how quickly you get ripped apart.

The Cubs are built like a dangerous AL type team. Whatever dude. Go cry in your name's irrelevance while Rick goes and trades for Carlos Beltran. Admit it, your brain shuts off when you talk about the Cubs. Go cry about the White Sox in the entire board dedicated to it. We are here to talk about the Cubs, a team that would benefit more from the DH than many other teams in the NL

 

QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Jul 12, 2016 -> 11:48 PM)
Might be one of the dumber things I've seen on here in a while.

you literally tried to change your name to penis and you think I'm dumb?

Edited by Deadpool
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...