southsider2k5 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Scott Merkin @scottmerkin 13m13 minutes ago Scottsdale, AZ Good stuff from Todd Steverson on Garcia, who he has pushed and been tough on but also remains confident about: http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/165...garcias-hitting … Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 He can hit. Just not well enough to overcome his defense, poor base running and lack of baseball IQ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 QUOTE (Harry Chappas @ Mar 1, 2016 -> 04:56 PM) He can hit. Just not well enough to overcome his defense, poor base running and lack of baseball IQ. Actually, last year he didn't hit. If he hits, he's a 1 WAR player. If he doesn't, he's replacement level or worse. He needs to hit. I haven't given up on a 280/330/450 season from him in '16. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2nd_city_saint787 Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 White Sox Facebook posted a slow mo of Avi's home run swing and damnit, it actually looks pretty damn good. Someone more technogically inclined wanna post it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 This article really scares me...starting to think no OF help is coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 Avi's D is his D; but it wouldn't surprise me if he hits pretty well. The list of players who have finally developed at 26-28 is pretty stout (donaldson, e.g.). Avi takes walks and hits the other way; if you can do those things, which are hard, you should be able to do other things that would help and are actually easier for most players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted March 1, 2016 Share Posted March 1, 2016 QUOTE (GreenSox @ Mar 1, 2016 -> 05:23 PM) Avi's D is his D; but it wouldn't surprise me if he hits pretty well. The list of players who have finally developed at 26-28 is pretty stout (donaldson, e.g.). Avi takes walks and hits the other way; if you can do those things, which are hard, you should be able to do other things that would help and are actually easier for most players. Avi Garcia has a completely different hitting profile than Josh Donaldson and he's unlikely to take another big step forward unless he finally learns some plate discipline (which is unlikely IMO). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Mar 1, 2016 -> 05:36 PM) Avi Garcia has a completely different hitting profile than Josh Donaldson and he's unlikely to take another big step forward unless he finally learns some plate discipline (which is unlikely IMO). You may be right, but I hear that about every young player the Sox have when they don't produce big as rookies (and sometimes even when they do - Trayce "fourth outfielder" Thompson, e.g.). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (GreenSox @ Mar 1, 2016 -> 07:05 PM) You may be right, but I hear that about every young player the Sox have when they don't produce big as rookies (and sometimes even when they do - Trayce "fourth outfielder" Thompson, e.g.). That's because when the Sox do give a guy a rare chance, they bet the entire season on him becoming an all star right away. When that doesn't happen he takes a large share of the blame for failing - because we don't blame the people who made the bad bet on him being ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glangon Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 All this Avi hype reminds me of the spin they tried to put on Gordon Beckham year after year. My real concern is that Eaton still can't play centre field and is hitting DH, we have little options in Centre Field if he is not good to go out there on Opening Day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 For now, my main concern is if the Sox feel that Fields could be a quality backup to CF and end up not bringing in another OF bat. Fields defense as a backup to CF is a good thing but it's his bat that makes me wonder. If Fields could hit just a little he could serve as a nice place holder to CF backup until May, hopefully, shows he's ready to take that spot. Still yet, I cling to hope that Hahn is able to bring in another bat for CF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 Haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 07:32 AM) For now, my main concern is if the Sox feel that Fields could be a quality backup to CF and end up not bringing in another OF bat. Fields defense as a backup to CF is a good thing but it's his bat that makes me wonder. If Fields could hit just a little he could serve as a nice place holder to CF backup until May, hopefully, shows he's ready to take that spot. Still yet, I cling to hope that Hahn is able to bring in another bat for CF. I don't know if he'll make it. The 25th spot will likely go to a platoon guy with LaRoche assuming there are no major additions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gosoxgo2005 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 I'll never understand people who say Adam Eaton can't play defense. In 2014 he was worth 12 DRS, which, per Fangraphs is right in between "great" and "gold glover". He has a brutal April defensively in 2015, so bad that it skewed his stats for the rest of the year. He is more than adequate defensively. I'd even say he's pretty damn good defensively for the most part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 07:37 AM) I don't know if he'll make it. The 25th spot will likely go to a platoon guy with LaRoche assuming there are no major additions. I take it you're thinking Sands then? Definitely possible at this point. I'm thinking Fields is possible if he can somehow hit as well or better than Shuck in ST. Fields is a much better option, defensively speaking, as a backup to CF. Shuck wasn't very good in CF last year and is much better at the corners. I'm on the fence really, Shuck has a better bat and plate discipline than Fields but Fields has the better defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 07:46 AM) I take it you're thinking Sands then? Definitely possible at this point. I'm thinking Fields is possible if he can somehow hit as well or better than Shuck in ST. Fields is a much better option, defensively speaking, as a backup to CF. Shuck wasn't very good in CF last year and is much better at the corners. I'm on the fence really, Shuck has a better bat and plate discipline than Fields but Fields has the better defense. Yeah probably Sands assuming they don't bring in a bench bat somehow I guess. I still think Raburn would be perfect to split time with LaRoche. Mashes lefties and we wouldn't have to face him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 07:49 AM) Yeah probably Sands assuming they don't bring in a bench bat somehow I guess. I still think Raburn would be perfect to split time with LaRoche. Mashes lefties and we wouldn't have to face him. I'm not against the Raburn idea but given his age and that the Sox already have Sands I'm guessing the Sox would roll with Sands instead of signing Raburn. Raburn would make a great platoon partner for LaRoche though. I like that Raburn can draw some walks too. VS. LHP Raburn could play RF with Avi at DH and VS. RHP LaRoche DH's with Avi (gulp) in RF. Screw it, sign Raburn and drop Olt! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 08:21 AM) I'm not against the Raburn idea but given his age and that the Sox already have Sands I'm guessing the Sox would roll with Sands instead of signing Raburn. Raburn would make a great platoon partner for LaRoche though. I like that Raburn can draw some walks too. VS. LHP Raburn could play RF with Avi at DH and VS. RHP LaRoche DH's with Avi (gulp) in RF. Screw it, sign Raburn and drop Olt! Sands has a lifetime .846 OPS vs. LHP. Not a bad guy to give LaRoche a break. I'm with you, he basically is Raburn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 08:28 AM) Sands has a lifetime .846 OPS vs. LHP. Not a bad guy to give LaRoche a break. I'm with you, he basically is Raburn. Yeah, I feel ok with him as LaRoche's platoon partner. The problem is LaRoche himself is a question mark and Sands really isn't an everyday option if Adam struggles again. It's the reason why we're much better off with Avi starting the season in that backup/platoon role and serving as LaRoche's insurance policy. If we're forced to make Schuck a starter at any point this season, then we're in a lot of trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (GreenSox @ Mar 1, 2016 -> 05:23 PM) Avi's D is his D; but it wouldn't surprise me if he hits pretty well. The list of players who have finally developed at 26-28 is pretty stout (donaldson, e.g.). Avi takes walks and hits the other way; if you can do those things, which are hard, you should be able to do other things that would help and are actually easier for most players. Where is this coming from??? Everybody, PLEASE STOP SAYING THIS. 6.0% walk rate last year. Sox as a team, 6.7%. MLB position players, 7.8%. 101st out of 141 qualified hitters in walk rate. By what standard are we honestly assessing that "Avi take walks?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glangon Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 03:09 PM) Where is this coming from??? Everybody, PLEASE STOP SAYING THIS. 6.0% walk rate last year. Sox as a team, 6.7%. MLB position players, 7.8%. 101st out of 141 qualified hitters in walk rate. By what standard are we honestly assessing that "Avi take walks?" By the Dayan Viciedo standard of course...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 09:09 AM) Where is this coming from??? Everybody, PLEASE STOP SAYING THIS. 6.0% walk rate last year. Sox as a team, 6.7%. MLB position players, 7.8%. 101st out of 141 qualified hitters in walk rate. By what standard are we honestly assessing that "Avi take walks?" By the standard that he had a higher walk rate than every starter except for Laroche and Eaton. It was the bench that pulled up the team walk rate. But indeed, when his rate is one of the starters' highest, that explains a lot. Edited March 2, 2016 by GreenSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (GreenSox @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 04:39 PM) By the standard that he had a higher walk rate than every starter except for Laroche and Eaton. It was the bench that pulled up the team walk rate. But indeed, when his rate is one of the starter's highest, that explains a lot. That's a poor standard. I would not say he takes walks, nor would I say anybody who walked at a lower rate than him last year took walks, but whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 05:55 PM) That's a poor standard. I would not say he takes walks, nor would I say anybody who walked at a lower rate than him last year took walks, but whatever. Also worth noting that Avi was 119th out of 141 qualified hitters in terms of "fraction of pitches thrown to him in the strike zone". He's down there with legit sluggers who the pitchers are scared of, and in fact saw even fewer strikes than Abreu - in other words, pitchers were also not throwing him strikes. He should have walked a lot when he's getting very few strikes, but he also had the highest %age of swings and misses per total pitches thrown in baseball among qualified hitters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted March 2, 2016 Share Posted March 2, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 2, 2016 -> 04:55 PM) That's a poor standard. Can't argue with that. I just don't think he deserves the beat down, considering the other offensive (and defensive) luminaries on this team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.