Knackattack Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QUOTE (Lillian @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 02:43 PM) How was Danks' velocity? That is the big question for me. If he can get that fast ball back into the low 90's he should be effective. His change up has become a solid pitch. Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QUOTE (Knackattack @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 06:49 PM) Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it This seems like the kind of thing that would be worse early in the year in Arizona than later in the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QUOTE (Knackattack @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 04:49 PM) Half of his change ups hang up high and get crushed though. If it's low and fading it's a great pitch, but Danks has shaky control and his lack of velocity makes it pretty easy to wait on that change and crush it when he hangs it The problem is batters can sit on his fastball outside too because he's never gonna bust anybody inside. He's always seemed like a 2 pitch guy to me. Not enough weapons at that low velocity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 05:33 PM) Last time I heard it was still spring training. You can't hang your hat on games like this Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 07:59 PM) Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good Somebody should have told Hahn that since he didn't bring in his replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (SCCWS @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 07:03 PM) [/b] Somebody should have told Hahn that since he didn't bring in his replacement. Yes he did, it's between Latos, Turner and EJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:04 PM) Yes he did, it's between Latos, Turner and EJ Sounds like you agree. Hahn assumed all along that Danks is the 4th starter. He brought in insurance for EJ not Danks Hahn said the Sox plan to go with Erik Johnson, along with their four returning left-handed starters. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/colum...125-column.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 03:50 PM) None at all. Ideally, I think it's better if Turner and Fulmer start in the rotation. It'll be Latos. Fulmer isn't ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (SCCWS @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:10 PM) Sounds like you agree. Hahn assumed all along that Danks is the 4th starter. He brought in insurance for EJ not Danks Hahn said the Sox plan to go with Erik Johnson, along with their four returning left-handed starters. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/colum...125-column.html He's lying. They didn't pay Latos $3 million to not be in the rotation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 But didn't they also give Turner something like $2.5 million? More "insurance" guys now. Which is better than the last couple of years at least when Carroll was one of the top options, along with Noesi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:56 PM) But didn't they also give Turner something like $2.5 million? Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 08:56 PM) But didn't they also give Turner something like $2.5 million? More "insurance" guys now. Which is better than the last couple of years at least when Carroll was one of the top options, along with Noesi. $1.5m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reiks12 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Very worried about our 4 and 5. Hopefully Danks and Co. can get back on track and not destroy our bullpen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDF Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (reiks12 @ Mar 14, 2016 -> 02:37 AM) Very worried about our 4 and 5. Hopefully Danks and Co. can get back on track and not destroy our bullpen. same here about Danks. who else does the sox have that can be hopefully counted on, that is on the team now... EJ eh no..... Edited March 14, 2016 by LDF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 13, 2016 -> 05:59 PM) Yes you can. Let's not pretend like we haven't seen this from Danks since his shoulder was operated on. At this point we are all praying that somehow he magically finds "it" and is good again. The likelihood of that is not good This is exactly the problem I see too. All the same people are using the same excuses of just being spring training, but for players such as Danks there should be no "just wait and see" approach. Weren't we supposed to give him time to heal from said injury before we could accurately asses him? This team cannot afford yet another typical early season bed wetting. And if Danks is being himself by May/June and we're competing, it's time to consider reassigning hos role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Mar 14, 2016 -> 12:56 AM) This is exactly the problem I see too. All the same people are using the same excuses of just being spring training, but for players such as Danks there should be no "just wait and see" approach. Weren't we supposed to give him time to heal from said injury before we could accurately asses him? This team cannot afford yet another typical early season bed wetting. And if Danks is being himself by May/June and we're competing, it's time to consider reassigning hos role. Having players peak the first couple weeks of spring training, especially pitchers, isn't exactly a great strategy. Danks is Danks. He'll be what he's been. Erik Johnson as well. Sure they may suck, but they don't have to be Cy Young candidates to do their job. There's a reason teams are hitting over .300 as a team right now even playing players who will not see the major leagues. The pitchers aren't ready, the fields are hard, the air is thin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts