RockRaines Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:22 AM) So the press was at the team meeting taking photos? You're better than that. Obviously not all team meetings are closed door. Which is also why you have no idea if he was there in those either. But when the team is meeting and the press is there he was in the picture. Even if he's not a distraction it's a bad precedent to set and they were right in going forwar establishing team rules around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (fathom @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:21 AM) And those are two guys who were here last year and used to it. Maybe the new guys came in and thought it was a distraction. Plus nobody is going to come out and say "good, it was weird he was here." He's probably a good kid and it's like having a locker room manager around, but it sets a bad precedent and clearly there was a reason management did something now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:23 AM) I'm sure some Nationals players struggled being themselves/censoring themselves with a kid around all the time, too. If that is the case, then you would agree, KW not changing the policy to totally ban kids is a half assed jesture, correct? The thing is while players didn't have their kids around as much as Drake, there are 25 guys and someone will bring his kid one day, another guy the next, plus with bat boys, and Make a Wish etc. there are kids around the Sox clubhouse every day whether Drake LaRoche is there or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:22 AM) So the press was at the team meeting taking photos? You're better than that. If there are photos, that isn't a true team meeting, something bat boys wouldn't have access. Why do you keep arguing this. There is no need of any players kid to be around the team all the time. Plan and simple. Edited March 17, 2016 by WhiteSoxLifer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchetman Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I find it disturbing all the cheap shots being taken at Laroche. Not necessarily here, but all over the media. BAD FATHER, KID CAN'T READ..stuff like that. Lot of angry/disturbed people out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:24 AM) Obviously not all team meetings are closed door. Which is also why you have no idea if he was there in those either. But when the team is meeting and the press is there he was in the picture. Even if he's not a distraction it's a bad precedent to set and they were right in going forwar establishing team rules around it. I linked an article which stated he didn't have total access, and he knew his place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 SportsCenterVerified account @SportsCenter 5m5 minutes ago The White Sox were right when they asked Adam LaRoche to limit his son's presence in clubhouse, says @notthefakeSVP. http://es.pn/1pw7gFf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:26 AM) Why do you keep arguing this. There is no need of any players kid to be around the team all the time. Plan and simple. Which is why Drake shouldn't have had his own locker and unlimited access---last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:26 AM) Why do you keep arguing this. There is no need of any players kid to be around the team all the time. Plan and simple. Again, I would be fine then if KW just banned kids period. But he didn't. If they are a distraction, this is a half assed effort on his and the team's part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I find it annoying that Ken Rosenthal was trying to make us look bad. Just saw this Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 12h12 hours ago Those of you who say the #WhiteSox players complained about LaRoche’s son being in clubhouse should read this: http://www.csnchicago.com/white-sox/white-...tuesday-meeting … Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:28 AM) I linked an article which stated he didn't have total access, and he knew his place. And there are other sources that said he was around 100% of the time. Which is correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Hatchetman @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:27 AM) I find it disturbing all the cheap shots being taken at Laroche. Not necessarily here, but all over the media. BAD FATHER, KID CAN'T READ..stuff like that. Lot of angry/disturbed people out there. I disagree. I'm sorry that I'm not going to jump on board and praise him for being a great father. He's not a great father. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panerista Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:31 AM) I disagree. I'm sorry that I'm not going to jump on board and praise him for being a great father. He's not a great father. Nailed it. Keeping your kid in a baseball locker room is not good parenting. The kid should be in school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:31 AM) I disagree. I'm sorry that I'm not going to jump on board and praise him for being a great father. He's not a great father. Dont you know? You can only be a great father if you take your kid to work with you everyday, the rest of us are bulls***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 Kelly Collis Verified account @cityshopgirl So proud @e3laroche for choosing #FamilyFirst #BaseballIsAFamilyGame http://foxs.pt/1Z4rnGq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:29 AM) Again, I would be fine then if KW just banned kids period. But he didn't. If they are a distraction, this is a half assed effort on his and the team's part. Kids being around isn't a distraction. None of them should be around 100% of the time. Adam LaRoche has an employer. He doesn't get to make the rules. He was given the mandate from the employer and he decided to take his ball and go home. Good f***ing riddance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:29 AM) Again, I would be fine then if KW just banned kids period. But he didn't. If they are a distraction, this is a half assed effort on his and the team's part. All he did was asking him to dial it back. Didn't say he couldn’t bring him in. What so hard to understand. I really think you like to argue for the sake of arguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:31 AM) I disagree. I'm sorry that I'm not going to jump on board and praise him for being a great father. He's not a great father. How would you know if he is a good father or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I love how some people want to use Fielder and Griffey as examples of why this should be allowed. Those are two kids who ended up f***ing HATING their fathers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:33 AM) All he did was asking him to dial it back. Didn't say he couldn’t bring him in. What so hard to understand. I really think you like to argue for the sake of arguing. No I don't. If he is a distraction why would it be OK if he still is a distraction only less of the time? It makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 (edited) DA it sounds like your trying to argue with people for the sake of arguing...it's been getting ridiculous the past few pages Edited March 17, 2016 by Baron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shago Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Tony @ Mar 16, 2016 -> 11:14 PM) Doesn't this almost make LaRoche look worse? There was an agreement. Things can change. They had a discussion, apparently a week ago, and LaRoche continued to bring his son into the clubhouse every day. Another conversation is had, and LaRoche picks up his ball and goes home? Circumstances change in business every day. Worse than his batting average, K rate, and general suck factor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:30 AM) And there are other sources that said he was around 100% of the time. Which is correct? Here's an article from last summer. And apparently KW didn't even realize the kid was around so much until this spring. http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseb...0620-story.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 17, 2016 -> 08:34 AM) How would you know if he is a good father or not? Adam said that he doesn't believe in school. He thinks that Drake will learn growing up in a baseball clubhouse and taking standardized tests instead. I disagree. I think he needs to be socialized and be with kids his own age instead of growing up around adults in a baseball clubhouse. I didn't think this stance was that controversial. This entire situation is so weird. Why would anyone want a 14 year old kid around their workplace constantly? I can't believe anyone is siding with LaRoche on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 This thread should be locked, as we're going in circles at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts