TheFutureIsNear Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Contract breakdown looks like this: '16- $17.6M '17-$17.6M '18- $18.6M '19- $18.6M '20- Option for $17M with $5M buyout So that's more or less $77M over 4 years. How much would Boston have to eat to get you to bite on Sandoval? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Honestly I don't think I want him at any price. He would just clog up DH for five years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 77M, give or take. The Red Sox can keep their Kung Fu Teletubby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Another testimonial to the brilliance of General Managers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 It would take the type of deal that saw the Rangers take back Hamilton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 If Boston pays $76,999,999 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 A majority stake in ownership of Panda Express. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Seriously, is this guy trying to eat his way out of baseball? WTF? Sandoval could pass for Fat Bastard's stunt double in the Austin Powers movies. http://nypost.com/2016/03/31/pablo-sandova...million-backup/ Again, the Kung Fu Teletubby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 10:33 AM) A majority stake in ownership of Panda Express. Blech. Pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Wouldnt touch with a 10 ft pole. This organization is in pretty decent shape, no reason to f*** it up with someone like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 10:26 AM) Honestly I don't think I want him at any price. He would just clog up DH for five years. And the toilets! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 I'd eat $5M. I think Panda can still be a decent ballplayer, but I wouldn't take any more than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 NO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 10:28 AM) It would take the type of deal that saw the Rangers take back Hamilton. This. If we took the remaining years at say $6 mill over the entirety, then maybe. But probably still no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 It is funny how some people wanted the Sox to sign him a year ago, and now they do not want to touch him with a 10 foot pole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Thats ok Boston. bye bye now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:11 AM) It is funny how some people wanted the Sox to sign him a year ago, and now they do not want to touch him with a 10 foot pole. Couldn't remember if I was on record as wanting Panda... QUOTE (shysocks @ Oct 9, 2014 -> 3:13 PM) Sandoval, despite being a switch hitter, also has the same platoon disadvantage as Conor. Career-long it isn't nearly as pronounced, but it was pretty severe in 2014. Worth watching, and I don't think he's a good target. He cratered to .197/.234/.231 against lefties in 2015. Phew. I promise I'll do this if I ever think of something I was wrong about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:11 AM) It is funny how some people wanted the Sox to sign him a year ago, and now they do not want to touch him with a 10 foot pole. Why? Stuff changes, mostly his wasteline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:36 AM) Couldn't remember if I was on record as wanting Panda... He cratered to .197/.234/.231 against lefties in 2015. Phew. I promise I'll do this if I ever think of something I was wrong about. to the Laroche thread with you. search for wrongness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 (edited) nm Edited March 31, 2016 by ChiSox59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 He would gain weight like those people on My 600 lb. life when he was playing for a contract. Now that he is guaranteed, there is no stopping that belly. His signing being a mistake was an easy thing to see before it happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:52 AM) He would gain weight like those people on My 600 lb. life when he was playing for a contract. Now that he is guaranteed, there is no stopping that belly. His signing being a mistake was an easy thing to see before it happened. And to be fair, literally no one thought signing Sandoval at anywhere near what Boston bid was a good idea. No one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:47 AM) to the Laroche thread with you. search for wrongness Wasn't wrong about anything in there sooo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (shysocks @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 11:59 AM) Wasn't wrong about anything in there sooo... To the Samardzija thread now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shysocks Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Mar 31, 2016 -> 12:03 PM) To the Samardzija thread now Was lukewarm on it due to Semien and rental nature. Here, I'll save you further effort. QUOTE (shysocks @ Dec 14, 2014 -> 10:05 AM) Love it, [signing Melky Cabrera] is my favorite move of the offseason. This team didn't have a #2 hitter and now it got the best one available. And I would have been fine with Melky at 4/$60, having to go three years is an early Hannukah miracle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.