Bigsoxhurt35 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ May 3, 2016 -> 09:35 PM) Putnam should be the guy if we score again My thought exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Too close to overturn? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Tie goes to the runner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Nice hustle by Melky. Too bad looks like he out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 RIP save situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (flavum @ May 3, 2016 -> 08:32 PM) Q should be done now. I'm a big believer in keeping guys in for 1-0 and 2-1 games unless the pitch count is way up there. Agreed. Now of course you create that uneasy situation where the closer has a 3-4 run lead and then pitches his way into trouble invariably. (Or maybe it's completely blown wide open the way this is developing.) The challenge is finding the right reliever (one would think Putnam or perhaps giving Petricka another shot) to finish the game if it's not 4-1. Albers has been used quite a bit. Of course, the other options would be Duke or Jennings. Or maybe Ventura wants to give Jones more experience in the 9th inning. Lots of choices, but not easy to decide on one. Edited May 4, 2016 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Royals losing too. NL kicking ass in interleague so far this season...also good for the Sox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxjr27 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Wait, didn't Boston just use their challenge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Yeah it looked out to me. Wasn't the manager out of challenges? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 No definitive proof so of course Red Sox get the call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Yea Farrell shouldn't have gotten that review that is bulls*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ May 4, 2016 -> 03:39 AM) Yeah it looked out to me. Wasn't the manager out of challenges? Supposed to be when ball is in back of the glove Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 He was out. Replay rules cost him a hit. Full speed action he looked safe. Slow mo he's out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxforlife05 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 If you lose a challenge you shouldn't get additional reviews upon request like that. Doesn't that defeat the purpose of having 1 challenge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (fathom @ May 3, 2016 -> 09:39 PM) No definitive proof so of course Red Sox get the call Idk I thought it looked obvious first replay as you can see from my post above on the last page. Edited May 4, 2016 by soxfan2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruth05 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Red Sox privilege at it's finest. That review shouldn't have even happened.BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ May 3, 2016 -> 08:39 PM) Wait, didn't Boston just use their challenge? exactly...wtf do you even have a set number of challenges if a manager can come out and whine. I used to be all for replay...but honestly it's turned into a f***ing waste of time. I can live with the "human factor". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Line Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 It feels like the sox are on the wrong end of challenges quite often. Is it just me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Keep that consecutive homer streak alive Brett! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 QUOTE (Wanne @ May 4, 2016 -> 02:40 AM) exactly...wtf do you even have a set number of challenges if a manager can come out and whine. I used to be all for replay...but honestly it's turned into a f***ing waste of time. I can live with the "human factor". The human factor ended in that Tiger no hitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Eh that sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 As imperfect as it is, I love replay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ May 3, 2016 -> 09:39 PM) Yeah it looked out to me. Wasn't the manager out of challenges? QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ May 3, 2016 -> 09:39 PM) Yea Farrell shouldn't have gotten that review that is bulls*** the umpires have discretion to go to replay starting in the 7th inning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted May 4, 2016 Share Posted May 4, 2016 Another BB...they have a ton lately considering they were bottom of the league early. Come on Carlos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts