Jump to content

5/11 - White Sox @ Rangers


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 635
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (aryzner @ May 11, 2016 -> 02:09 PM)
Farmer and DJ both said he definitely was hit by that pitch.

 

Was he?

 

I think it did, but there wasn't enough video evidence to really overturn it. It's a hard one to challenge to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (aryzner @ May 11, 2016 -> 02:09 PM)
Farmer and DJ both said he definitely was hit by that pitch.

 

Was he?

Hawk said it did too. I have a mediocre quality feed so I couldn't tell.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ May 11, 2016 -> 02:09 PM)
Or he cost us our challenge in the 4th inning on a HBP.. Which he just did.

 

Farrell showed you dont need a challenge. You can just tell the umpires they will review it, and they will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BrianAnderson @ May 11, 2016 -> 12:53 PM)
His K:BB is right in line with Keuchel thus far. Still striking out 1 per inning. It's also better than Latos (though not surprising seeing as that's not what Latos is known for)

 

However, just saying, I don't think this is a good matchup for us today.

 

If I were to step back -- I'm calling:

 

Rangers 7

Sox 2

 

Hamels goes 7 innings. Strikes out 8, Walks 2. 2ER

Latos goes 6, 5ER

 

And I'm pretty good at stepping back and being smart on this - so i'll eat crow if im wrong - but I'm like 90% betting on the Sox this year (yesterday being one of my few losses --- wasn't fun waking up thinking I had won $$ and actually lost money....)

 

 

Hey, that's why we play the game. Go Go Sox, keep beating up on Hamels!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ May 11, 2016 -> 02:11 PM)
Please send Saladino and Sands down and bring up Shuck.

 

Saladino is too valuable defensively.

 

But yes to Sands being sent down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is amazing is how many replay challenges wind up pretty much not enough evidence to overturn. (I think the 2 extra cameras thing they floated to Hawk is BS as I have walked around USCF plenty, and haven't seen extra cameras anywhere for replay purposes only).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...