caulfield12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Great, we'll bring in Duke and Ortiz will definitely homer or double, lol. Leaving in Nate Jones. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (CB2.0 @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 07:22 PM) Just as much as fat ass Avi scoring from second on a hit. Garcia can run....it's just that it takes him forever to get started. Once running, he's quite fast for his size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Just put him on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Or not. Good job Nate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Jonesy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) Hmmm...not sure what's going on with this game, but the baseball gods seem determined to make Sox fans suffer SOMEHOW. Trade Jones to the Red Sox immediately, his value's never going to be higher!!! Edited June 21, 2016 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:22 PM) A team cant afford to give away outs and you sac bunt. It's just dumb. When it's Jason Coats it really isn't giving up an out. It is making said out productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Great call by Ventura and great execution by Jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkness99 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:20 PM) Yeah Jason Coats is a huge threat too. Dick is correct... Coats bunting made sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:25 PM) When it's Jason Coats it really isn't giving up an out. It is making said out productive. The percentage of scoring goes down either way when bunting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 21, 2016 -> 02:22 AM) A team cant afford to give away outs and you sac bunt. It's just dumb. No it's not in that situation. Late in the game with a Tie score it was a good strategy move Edited June 21, 2016 by elrockinMT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Uribe clubs his 5th homer. 7-4 Indians keep rolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB2.0 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 It's giving up an out. Anyone can run into a hit against a knuckleballer. Trying to bunt one is about as stupid a call as you can make; magnified by 10x in a 1-1 game in the 8th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I liked the bunt actually. Coats has shown no ability to hit, and Anderson and Eaton are two of the better threats to slap one into the outfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Wow, thought Abreu crushed that. Just no bat speed anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 That ball just died in CF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:27 PM) The percentage of scoring goes down either way when bunting. It depends on the hitter. The odds of him getting to second on an out were pretty slim. A fly ball wouldn't have done it. A strikeout wouldn't have done it. A group all may have done it and may have been 2. A better hitter up there I would agree with you. But u til Jason gets off the snide, you can"t anticipate a hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Great hustle by Melky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 That bobble cost them a hit. Late inning magic for ToddFather come on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Todd hitting .198 LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB2.0 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Come on Todd....so due. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Quick! Bunt Todd! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxforlife05 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:13 PM) I want Jay Bruce on this team Ugh another overpay for a mediocre veteran having a career year. No thanks. I've had enough of the Reds players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (CB2.0 @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:27 PM) It's giving up an out. Anyone can run into a hit against a knuckleballer. Trying to bunt one is about as stupid a call as you can make; magnified by 10x in a 1-1 game in the 8th. Do you see what the league is hitting against this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Jun 20, 2016 -> 08:25 PM) When it's Jason Coats it really isn't giving up an out. It is making said out productive. Because hoping he'll get hit by a pitch is the only other option Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts