Jump to content

7/6/16 - Yankees @ White Sox - 7:10 - WPWR


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 08:25 PM)
Because the game is on WPWR....

 

 

There's a LOGICAL answer.

 

Although I would imagine every professional sports team's message boards are more active in losses (especially controversial ones, see Boston threads with Farrell getting 100X more heat than Ventura ever will)...UNLESS they're Opening Day, playoff-clinching or post season determining games, BlackOut, post season/World Series, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:23 PM)
Wow the ignorance some of you are showing...

 

You have never noticed that when the white sox games are not on CSN that the threads are much smaller?

 

It's really that simple.

 

A lot of us do not live in Illinois, or the Chicago area.

 

 

must be trolling.. its the only answer I have.

 

There is absolutely a difference between posting patterns when the team is losing, losing big, and winning. Threads are always WAY longer when the team is losing, and biggest of all when losing big.

 

If you don't believe me, then yes, ignorance is the answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 08:28 PM)
There is absolutely a difference between posting patterns when the team is losing, losing big, and winning. Threads are always WAY longer when the team is losing, and biggest of all when losing big.

 

If you don't believe me, then yes, ignorance is the answer.

Lead by example - stop whining and moaning about all of this and talk up this rather nice 5-0 lead we have going on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:27 PM)
I believe you are, based on all of your negativity.

 

The scary thing is that I think you actually believe somehow obsessing over and over again about how bad the franchise is isn't negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:28 PM)
There is absolutely a difference between posting patterns when the team is losing, losing big, and winning. Threads are always WAY longer when the team is losing, and biggest of all when losing big.

 

If you don't believe me, then yes, ignorance is the answer.

 

The question was why is the thread shorter... the answer is simple and I'm 100% sure - the game is not on CSN.

 

 

Do people post more when the team is losing.. maybe. But the game threads are ALWAYS ALWAYS shorter non CSN nights... I'm betting the amount of people actually watching the game drops by 65-70%

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Thad Bosley @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:30 PM)
Lead by example - stop whining and moaning about all of this and talk up this rather nice 5-0 lead we have going on here.

 

I will if I don't have to read you replying repeated about how bad things are for the White Sox in every reply you make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:31 PM)
The question was why is the thread shorter... the answer is simple and I'm 100% sure - the game is not on CSN.

 

 

Do people post more when the team is losing.. maybe. But the game threads are ALWAYS ALWAYS shorter non CSN nights... I'm betting the amount of people actually watching the game drops by 65-70%

 

Yea that reason is 100 percent wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:31 PM)
The question was why is the thread shorter... the answer is simple and I'm 100% sure - the game is not on CSN.

 

 

Do people post more when the team is losing.. maybe. But the game threads are ALWAYS ALWAYS shorter non CSN nights... I'm betting the amount of people actually watching the game drops by 65-70%

 

The part you are missing here is that Channel 50 is actually a free channel available over the airwaves. CSN is not. More people get 50, than do CSN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 08:32 PM)
I will if I don't have to read you replying repeated about how bad things are for the White Sox in every reply you make.

Very false statement, and shame on you for making it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:35 PM)
The part you are missing here is that Channel 50 is actually a free channel available over the airwaves. CSN is not. More people get 50, than do CSN.

 

Go back and look at all the threads is all I can say... It's probably not worth your time - but you would see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:34 PM)
You should go look up the threads.

 

I have been part of this site for over 10 years now, and I can tell you for a fact that the off channel has nothing to do with the size of the thread

 

But since you are so sure of it, feel free to look at the archives and cross reference the schedule to prove me wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 08:31 PM)
The scary thing is that I think you actually believe somehow obsessing over and over again about how bad the franchise is isn't negative.

What's scary is you constantly pointing out what you consider to be other's negativity yet not acknowledging the volume of your own around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:37 PM)
The 20 longest game threads this year....the Sox are 11-9.

 

 

Don't feel like doing more research than that.

You don't want to start a thread about threads? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TRADE WINDS STILL NOT OPEN: According to private SoxTalk survey, inability to discuss possible trades in one convenient place has discombobulated many posters and sent them off to other sites. Strategic boycotts of game threads was their first non-violent method of drawing attention.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ Jul 6, 2016 -> 09:37 PM)
Go back and look at all the threads is all I can say... It's probably not worth your time - but you would see it.

541 posts in the game against Boston. WGN games would be the same. You are wrong. James Sheilds on a weekday WGN game got over 400.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...