cwsox Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 what happened? koch happened a perfect imitation of a few foulke appearances in the metrodome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn12 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 In all fairness to Koch (we all knew he has a propensity for the long ball), the game shoulda been over in the 9th. f***chop Jimenez, I'd be happy to never see him in the starting lineup, wait...on the White Sox roster EVER again. Definition of a complete Blockhead. Where does KW find these "great finds"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 the game shoulda been over in the 9th. f***chop Jimenez, I'd be happy to never see him in the starting lineup, wait...on the White Sox roster EVER again. can't argue there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 I don't like Harris, D'Angelo or Rios. Do any of you? Koch is a disaster. KW makes me sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1549 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Final score, anybody? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cwsox Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Final score, anybody? read it and weep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshPR Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 f*** jIMENEZ, kLESKO WAS rIGHT. bRING UP mILES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 f*** jIMENEZ, kLESKO WAS rIGHT. bRING UP mILES I agree wholeheartedly. I don't care if Miles is "non-prospect". The dude has a propensity for making things happen. Jiminez appears to be out there to see if anything will happen. I'd rather have a non-prospect sparkplug playing in our lineup than high-upside lazy ass any day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hotsoxchick1 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 f*** jIMENEZ, kLESKO WAS rIGHT. bRING UP mILES ive been screaming for miles since the season started.........bring him up now.......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastime Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Jimenez has the baseball instincts of a bag of hair. There's a good reason why that piece of crap has been with 3 teams in 3 years. Piss on him. And I wish I could - unless he's on fire - then I'd let him burn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 You guys realize that if Harris or Rios know how to track and catch a fly ball without letting it get past them, or if Frank Thomas can actually dig out a realatively simple turf bounce from Joe Crede ( it bounced about 10 feet in front of him, Frank contorted his body away from the ball and wiffed on it) the final score is 5-3 Sox. Sure the offense didn't contribute in the 2nd half of the game, but if the defense is even respectable this whole conversation is moot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 You guys realize that if Harris or Rios know how to track and catch a fly ball without letting it get past them, or if Frank Thomas can actually dig out a realatively simple turf bounce from Joe Crede ( it bounced about 10 feet in front of him, Frank contorted his body away from the ball and wiffed on it) the final score is 5-3 Sox. Sure the offense didn't contribute in the 2nd half of the game, but if the defense is even respectable this whole conversation is moot. The throw from Crede landed in the dirt, making it a MUCH tougher play than if it had hit the turf instead. It was ANYTHING but an easy play, and that idiot Crede did what he always does -- throw it low. It's not like he had Vince Coleman (circa 1986) running down the line. How does a MAJOR LEAGUER f*** up such an easy play? Only a bonehead would blame that on Frank. And Frank later in the game dug out an equally horrible throw by Jose, so lay off of the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 The throw from Crede landed in the dirt, making it a MUCH tougher play than if it had hit the turf instead. It was ANYTHING but an easy play, and that idiot Crede did what he always does -- throw it low. It's not like he had Vince Coleman (circa 1986) running down the line. How does a MAJOR LEAGUER f*** up such an easy play? Only a bonehead would blame that on Frank. And Frank later in the game dug out an equally horrible throw by Jose, so lay off of the guy. Look at the replay. That ball bounced about 2 feet from the dirt on the turf. It was a turf bounce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Meanwhile this was the 9th winnable game Sox let get away (whether via situational hitting, running, defense or bullpen)...since the Jake series spanning little more than 3 weeks. (2 in Cle, 1 in Ari, 1 in LA, 1 SF, 1 SD, 1 Bos, 1 Cubs, 1 Minn so far). I bet those Mariner over-achievers don't have as many giveaways the whole year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Look at the replay. That ball bounced about 2 feet from the dirt on the turf. It was a turf bounce. I don't have access to a replay, so I'll have to take your word for it. But regardless of where it bounced, it was a horrid throw by Crede and Frank shouldn't be blamed for not being able to dig it and make the play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Meanwhile this was the 9th winnable game Sox let get away (whether via situational hitting, running, defense or bullpen)...since the Jake series spanning little more than 3 weeks. (2 in Cle, 1 in Ari, 1 in LA, 1 SF, 1 SD, 1 Bos, 1 Cubs, 1 Minn so far). I bet those Mariner over-achievers don't have as many giveaways the whole year. I don't know what criteria you use for determining games that the Sox blow, but I was at the Dodger series, and we didn't blow the 2-1 loss. We just ran into good Dodger pitching that day. I think it was Molto the other day who said that you need to sometimes give credit to our opponents and say that on that day, they were just better than us. Now, the last Boston game I do remember, as well as yesterday's Minnesota game. Oh yeah, and of course that horrid Colon/Bonds game. The others I don't recall, but I'm sure they aren't as bad as the 3 I just mentioned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Meanwhile this was the 9th winnable game Sox let get away (whether via situational hitting, running, defense or bullpen)...since the Jake series spanning little more than 3 weeks. (2 in Cle, 1 in Ari, 1 in LA, 1 SF, 1 SD, 1 Bos, 1 Cubs, 1 Minn so far). I bet those Mariner over-achievers don't have as many giveaways the whole year. I don't know what criteria you use for determining games that the Sox blow, but I was at the Dodger series, and we didn't blow the 2-1 loss. We just ran into good Dodger pitching that day. I think it was Molto the other day who said that you need to sometimes give credit to our opponents and say that on that day, they were just better than us. Now, the last Boston game I do remember, as well as yesterday's Minnesota game. Oh yeah, and of course that horrid Colon/Bonds game. The others I don't recall, but I'm sure they aren't as bad as the 3 I just mentioned. Even if I were to shave off 4 benefit-of-the-doubt games....5 game differential is still TOO f***ING HIGH for a playoff team that couldn't beat easy oppoenents in April and now has to overachieve... (But since I am pretty confiedent and remember the details of those games, I am not going to concede this to you or anyone. MINUS-9 is what it is.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 But since I am pretty confiedent and remember the details of those games, I am not going to concede this to you or anyone. MINUS-9 is what it is. Uh, I don't care if you concede anything or not. It's not going to change the record of the Sox, so why would I care? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrandoFan Posted June 26, 2003 Share Posted June 26, 2003 Uh, I don't care if you concede anything or not. It's not going to change the record of the Sox, so why would I care? Trust me, you will care when we continue losing close games like that any way we can (running, defense, sit hitting, BL, umpiring, etc) for the remainder of the year and end up missing playoffs by 5 games, prompting a WF-2. (Or do you still think that law of averages will bail the Sox out?) Ok, so you agree on BoSox/SF/Minnesota....What about San Diego? What about Cubs? If Cle-Ari-La is ancient history, then about those losses? I think it would be lazy to excuse our pathetic play and give our opponets credit for something they didn't deserve... (I guess when Sox were losing games in April-May left and right- to KCs, to Baltimores, to Tigers, to Indians, etc....it was because most of the time they outplayed us, too...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.